Cited by 172Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The validation of Fitbit Zip™ physical activity monitor as a measure of free-living physical activity

Open access
Tully, Mark A, McBride, Cairmeal, Heron, Leonnie, Hunter, Ruth F·2014·BMC Research Notes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The new generation of activity monitors allow users to upload their data to the internet and review progress. The aim of this study is to validate the Fitbit Zip as a measure of free-living physical activity. FINDINGS: Participants wore a Fitbit Zip, ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer and a Yamax CW700 pedometer for seven days. Participants were asked their opinion on the utility of the Fitbit Zip. Validity was assessed by comparing the output using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Bland-Altman plots. 59.5% (25/47) of the cohort were female. There was a high correlation in steps/day between the Fitbit Zip and the two reference devices (r = 0.91, p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference between the Fitbit and Yamax steps/day was observed (Median (IQR) 7477 (3597) vs 6774 (3851); p = 0.11). The Fitbit measured significantly more steps/day than the Actigraph (7477 (3597) vs 6774 (3851); p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic differences between the devices. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high level of correlation and no apparent systematic biases in the Bland Altman plots, the use of Fitbit Zip as a measure of physical activity. However the Fitbit Zip recorded a significantly higher number of steps per day than the Actigraph.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-0500-7-952

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tully, M. A., McBride, C., Heron, L., & Hunter, R. F.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Tully, Mark A
Venue
BMC Research Notes
Published
2014
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
952
ISSN
1756-0500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102760209
Cited by
172
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 11
FWCI
13.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Research Notes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • Alzheimer's Research Trust
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Diabetes UK
  • Stroke Association
  • Public Health Agency
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023241/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • World Cancer Research Fund
  • Health and Social Care Research and Development Division
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, accelerometer, pedometers, free-living physical activity, step count, device validation, ActiGraph GT3X+
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Fitness, Telemetry, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult, Actigraphy, Independent Living, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review