Cited by 93Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Understanding Feline Heartworm Infection: Disease, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Lee, Alice C.Y., Atkins, Clarke E.·2010·Topics in Companion Animal Medicine

Abstract

Feline heartworm disease is a very different clinical entity from canine heartworm disease. In cats, the arrival and death of immature heartworms in the pulmonary arteries can cause coughing and dyspnea as early as 3 months postinfection. Adult heartworms suppress the function of pulmonary intravascular macrophages and thus reduce clinical disease in chronic feline heartworm infection. Approximately 80% of asymptomatic cats self-cure. Median survival time for symptomatic cats is 1.5 years, or 4 years if only cats living beyond the day of presentation are considered. Aberrant worm migration is more frequent than it is in dogs, and sudden death can occur with no prior clinical signs. The bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia likely contributes to the inflammatory pathology of heartworm disease, but its role is not yet fully clear. Unfortunately, the diagnosis, treatment, and management of feline heartworm disease are far from simple. Antemortem diagnosis is hampered by low worm burdens, the frequency of all-male infections, and nonspecific radiographic lesions. It is up to the veterinarian to determine the correct index of suspicion and choose the right combination of diagnostic tests to achieve an answer. Treatment is symptomatic because adulticide therapy is risky and does not increase survival time. Despite the dangers of feline heartworm disease, less than 5% of cats in the United States are on chemoprophylaxis. It is important for veterinarians to take a proactive preventive stance because heartworm infection in cats is a multisystemic disease that has no easy cure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.tcam.2010.09.003

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, A. C. Y., & Atkins, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Alice C.Y.
Venue
Topics in Companion Animal Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
224-230
ISSN
  • 0882-0511 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-9736
OpenAlex
W2125741549
Cited by
93
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Topics in companion animal medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
feline heartworm disease, Dirofilaria immitis, cats, pulmonary artery, pulmonary intravascular macrophages, self-cure, sudden death, Wolbachia, chemoprophylaxis, survival time
MeSH terms
Animals, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Echocardiography, Female, Life Cycle Stages, Male, Prognosis, Pulmonary Artery, Remission, Spontaneous, Risk Factors, Radiography, Thoracic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review