Cited by 37Physical Activity and HealthMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Towards a physically more active lifestyle based on one’s own values: the results of a randomized controlled trial among physically inactive adults

Open access
Kangasniemi, Anu Maarit, Lappalainen, Raimo, Kankaanpää, Anna, Tolvanen, Asko, Tammelin, Tuija·2015·BMC Public Health

Abstract

The high prevalence of physical inactivity has led to a search for novel and feasible interventions that will enhance physical activity, especially among the least physically active individuals. This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the effectiveness of a value-based intervention to promote a physically more active lifestyle among physically inactive adults. The framework of the study was based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Physically inactive participants aged 30 to 50 years (n = 138) were randomly allocated to a feedback (FB, n = 69) or an acceptance- and commitment-based group (ACT + FB, n = 69). Both groups received written feedback about their objectively measured physical activity and were offered a body composition analysis. In addition, the participants in the ACT + FB group attended six group sessions and were given a pedometer for self-monitoring their physical activity during the nine-week intervention. The primary outcome was physical activity. In addition, participants’ cognitions related to exercise and physical activity were evaluated at baseline and at three- and six-month follow-ups. The changes in mean physical activity level were analysed using multilevel random regression and rank order stability, using the structural equation model. Participants in both groups increased their objectively measured and self-reported physical activity with high individual differences. No difference was observed in the change of physical activity level between the FB and ACT + FB groups over time. However, the cognitions related to physical activity and exercise improved more in the ACT + FB group than in the FB group. In addition, after re-analyzing the data among the non-depressive participants, higher stability was observed in objectively measured physical activity at the individual level between the three- and six-month follow-ups in the ACT + FB group as compared to FB group. Acceptance- and commitment-based group intervention, combined with the self-monitoring of physical activity, was beneficial in supporting the cognition related to exercise and physical activity, and brought more stability to the individual level physical activity behaviour change, especially among the non-depressive participants. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01796990 . Registered in February 2013.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-015-1604-x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a standalone therapy has not been shown to be effective in enhancing physical activity in randomised controlled trials published to date.

    “Furthermore, in the RCTs published to date, ACT as a standalone therapy has not been shown to be effective in enhancing physical activity [26, 27].”

    From Exercise combined with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ExACT) compared to a supervised exercise programme for adults with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. (2018) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports no greater increase in mean physical activity for the ACT-based group than for the feedback-only group. But the Methods describe an ACT intervention combined with feedback and self-monitoring, not standalone ACT. This trial therefore does not establish the broader claim about standalone ACT across published RCTs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kangasniemi, A. M., Lappalainen, R., Kankaanpää, A., Tolvanen, A., & Tammelin, T.
Affiliations
  • LIKES – Foundation for Sport and Health Sciences (FI)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Kangasniemi, Anu Maarit
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2015-03-18
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4247999974
Cited by
37
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Juho Vainion Säätiö
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
physical inactivity, physical activity promotion, acceptance and commitment therapy, self-monitoring, pedometers, feedback, body composition assessment, behavior change, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review