Cited by 55Social Media in Health EducationDigital Marketing and Social MediaDental Education, Practice, Research

The use of social media for professional purposes among dentists in Saudi Arabia

Open access
Al-Khalifa, Khalifa S., Al-Swuailem, Abdullah S., AlSheikh, Rasha, Muazen, Yasmeen Y., Al-Khunein, Yazeed A., Halawany, Hassan, Al-Abidi, Khalid S.·2021·BMC Oral Health

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the dentists’ opinions towards social media (SM) use in daily practice and the expected limitations from its use in Saudi Arabia. Methods: An electronic survey was carried out throughout May–June 2020 among a sample of dentists in Saudi Arabia. The survey covered three parts: the first part covered professional and demographic information, the second part covered the use of mobile phones and SM in dental practice, while the third part assessed dentists’ opinion on SM use. Descriptive statistics included frequency distributions and percentages and independent t test/ANOVA test for the relationship between the mean of dentists’ opinion towards SM and demographic variables. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. Results: The majority of respondents (80%) believe that SM plays an active role in patients’ decisions regarding the selection of a healthcare provider. The mean dentists’ opinion scores on the use of SM were significantly lower among participants working more than 50 h per week compared with other participants (p = 0.014). Conclusion: The majority of sampled dentists believe that SM plays an active role in patients’ decisions regarding the healthcare provider’s selection. Directed campaigns can help dentists optimize the use of SM for both professional and personal purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12903-021-01390-w

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Khalifa, K. S., Al-Swuailem, A. S., AlSheikh, R., Muazen, Y. Y., Al-Khunein, Y. A., Halawany, H., & Al-Abidi, K. S.
Affiliations
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Venue
BMC Oral Health
Published
2021-01-12
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
26-26
ISSN
1472-6831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3118662767
Cited by
55
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Oral Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
social media, dentists, dental practice, professional use of social media, patient decision-making, working hours, Saudi Arabia
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Dentists, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saudi Arabia, Practice Patterns, Dentists', Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review