Cited by 3Diabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Overcoming the struggle of living with type 2 diabetes – diabetes specialist nurses’ and patients’ perspectives on digital interventions

Open access
Jarl, Frida, Davelid, Anna, Hedin, Katarina, Stomby, Andreas, Petersson, Christina·2023·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

Background: Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) is a cornerstone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It is unclear whether delivering DSMES as a digital health intervention (DHI) might meet the needs experienced by patients with T2DM and diabetes specialist nurses (DSN) of the primary health care system in Sweden. Methods: Fourteen patients with T2DM and four DSN participated in three separate focus groups: two groups comprised patients and one group comprised DSN. The patients discussed the questions: “What needs did you experience after your T2DM diagnosis?” and “How might these needs be met with a DHI?” The DSN discussed the questions: “What needs do you experience when treating a patient with newly diagnosed T2DM?” and “How might these needs be met with a DHI?”. Furthermore, data were collected in the form of field notes from group discussions at a meeting including 18 DSNs working with T2DM in PHCCs. The discussions from focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analyzed together with the field notes from the meeting using inductive content analysis. Results: The analysis yielded the overall theme: “Overcoming the struggle of living with T2DM”, which was summarized in two categories: “learning and being prepared” and “giving and receiving support”. Important findings were that, for success, a DHI for DSMES must be integrated into routine care, provide structured, high-quality information, suggest tasks to stimulate behavioral changes, and provide feedback from the DSN to the patient. Conclusion: This study highlighted several important aspects, from the perspectives of both the patient with T2DM and the DSN, which should be taken into consideration for the successful development and use of a DHI for DSMES.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-023-09277-y

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unmet need in T2DM care can be alleviated by wider use of digital technologies designed to help patients with lifestyle and health-related decisions by making accessible critical data and on-demand consultations.

    “This unmet need can be alleviated by a wider use of digital technologies designed to help patients with their lifestyle and health-related decisions by making accessible critical data and on-demand consultations [5].”

    From Digital Interventions for Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results (pp. not provided) describe a digital intervention offering reliable diabetes and lifestyle information when patients need it, along with access to nurse feedback. They propose asynchronous chat for questions between visits, but nurses would respond when their schedules allow; the paper does not support on-demand consultations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jarl, F., Davelid, A., Hedin, K., Stomby, A., & Petersson, C.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Region Jönköpings län (SE)
Corresponding author
Jarl, Frida
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2023-03-30
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
313-313
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362506317
Cited by
3
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Diabetesförbundet
  • Futurum - Akademin för Hälsa och Vård, Region Jönköpings läns
  • Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige
  • Linköping University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management education and support, digital health interventions, diabetes specialist nurses, patient perspectives, nurses' perceptions, newly diagnosed diabetes, behavior change, patient support, primary care
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Nurses, Health Behavior, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review