The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Billions of dollars are lost annually in health research that fails to create meaningful benefits for patients. Engaging in research co-design – the meaningful involvement of end-users in research – may help address this research waste. This rapid overview of reviews addressed three related questions, namely (1) what approaches to research co-design exist in health settings? (2) What activities do these research co-design approaches involve? (3) What do we know about the effectiveness of existing research co-design approaches? The review focused on the study planning phase of research, defined as the point up to which the research question and study design are finalised. Methods: Reviews of research co-design were systematically identified using a rapid overview of reviews approach (PROSPERO: CRD42019123034). The search strategy encompassed three academic databases, three grey literature databases, and a hand-search of the journal Research Involvement and Engagement . Two reviewers independently conducted the screening and data extraction and resolved disagreements through discussion. Disputes were resolved through discussion with a senior author (PB). One reviewer performed quality assessment. The results were narratively synthesised. Results: A total of 26 records (reporting on 23 reviews) met the inclusion criteria. Reviews varied widely in their application of ‘research co-design’ and their application contexts, scope and theoretical foci. The research co-design approaches identified involved interactions with end-users outside of study planning, such as recruitment and dissemination. Activities involved in research co-design included focus groups, interviews and surveys. The effectiveness of research co-design has rarely been evaluated empirically or experimentally; however, qualitative exploration has described the positive and negative outcomes associated with co-design. The research provided many recommendations for conducting research co-design, including training participating end-users in research skills, having regular communication between researchers and end-users, setting clear end-user expectations, and assigning set roles to all parties involved in co-design. Conclusions: Research co-design appears to be widely used but seldom described or evaluated in detail. Though it has rarely been tested empirically or experimentally, existing research suggests that it can benefit researchers, practitioners, research processes and research outcomes. Realising the potential of research co-design may require the development of clearer and more consistent terminology, better reporting of the activities involved and better evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite the rise in popularity and continued growth of youth engagement in health research, systematic and deliberate theory‐building has been limited.”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Given the near‐unanimous recognition that the biggest gap in this area of research is the lack of evidence on impact gained through rigorous evaluation, 43 , 57 , 58 , 61 , 90 the small number of impact‐focused models and frameworks is noteworthy.”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with review findings of empirical studies in PPI whereby short‐term, individual‐level outcomes were more represented in the literature. 43 , 91 , 92”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · cited 1×
“For example, the Fogg Behaviour Model [53] or the COM-B Behaviour Change model [54] could be used to diagnose actors’ capabilities, motivation, and triggers or opportunities.”
MethodDevelopment of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 · Cited by 4,374
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 · Cited by 3,469
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. G. (2014) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 · Cited by 2,700
A behavior model for persuasive design
Fogg, B. (2009) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology · doi:10.1145/1541948.1541999 · Cited by 2,328
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60329-9 · Cited by 2,208
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3453 · Cited by 1,983
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Oliver S, Gray J. A bibliography of research reports about patients’, clinicians’ and researchers’ priorities for new research. London: James Lind Alliance; 2006.
- Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research World Health Organization; 2017.
- Veritas health innovation covidence systematic review software. Melbourne.https://www.covidence.org/home. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.
- INVOLVE. Guidance on co-producing a research project. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2018.
- INVOLVE. Co-production in action: number one. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2019.
- Algate F, Gallagher R, Nguyen S, Ruda S, Sanders M (2014) EAST: four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. https://www.bi.team/publications/east-four-simple-ways-to-apply-behavioural-insights/. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Barker, T. G., O’Higgins, A., Fonagy, P., & Gardner, F. E. M. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.080 · Cited by 28
Busciantella-Ricci, D., & Scataglini, S. (2024) · Design Science · doi:10.1017/dsj.2023.35 · Cited by 31
A qualitative evaluation of a co‐design process involving young people at risk of suicide
Kehoe, M., Whitehead, R., de Boer, K., Meyer, D., Hopkins, L., & Nedeljkovic, M. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13986 · Cited by 28
Hoekstra, F., Pereira, F. T., Sibley, K. M., Graham, I. D., Kennefick, M., Mrklas, K., Nguyen, T., Vis‐Dunbar, M., Panel, S. I. G. P. C., & Gainforth, H. L. (2022) · Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine · doi:10.1080/10790268.2022.2033578 · Cited by 28
Co-designing an Integrated Health and Social Care Hub With and for Families Experiencing Adversity
Hall, T., Loveday, S., Pullen, S., Loftus, H., Constable, L. N., Paton, K., & Hiscock, H. (2023) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.6975 · Cited by 28
Alex, J., Maneze, D., Ramjan, L. M., Ferguson, C., Montayre, J., & Salamonson, Y. (2022) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105319 · Cited by 27
Co-design for stroke intervention development: Results of a scoping review
Singh, H., Benn, N., Fung, A., Kokorelias, K. M., Martyniuk, J., Nelson, M. L. A., Colquhoun, H. L., Cameron, J. I., Munce, S., Saragosa, M., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297162 · Cited by 27
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare
Tsang, J. Y., Peek, N. B., Buchan, I. E., van der Veer, S. N., & Brown, B. C. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac031 · Cited by 27
Bryant, L., Sedlarevic, N., Stubbs, P. W., Bailey, B., Nguyen, V. A., Bluff, A., Barnett, D., Estela, M., Hayes, C., Jacobs, C., et al. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2022.2063423 · Cited by 30
Fitzgerald, M., Ponsford, J. L., Lannin, N. A., O'Brien, T. J., Cameron, P. A., Cooper, D. J., Rushworth, N., AUS-TBI Investigators, & Gabbe, B. (2022) · Neurotrauma Reports · doi:10.1089/neur.2022.0002 · Cited by 27
Johnson, G. U., Towell‐Barnard, A., McLean, C., Robert, G., & Ewens, B. A. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104888 · Cited by 26
Guyatt, S., Ferguson, M., Beckmann, M. M., & Wilkinson, S. A. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07024-9 · Cited by 26
Using Co-Design to Develop a Health Literacy Intervention with Socially Disadvantaged Adolescents
Goss, H. R., Smith, C. W., Hickey, L., Issartel, J., Morrissey, J., Murrin, C. M., Spillane, A., & Belton, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19094965 · Cited by 26
Downs, J. A., Keeley, J., Skoss, R., Mills, J., Nevill, T., Schippers, A., Lindly, O. J., & Thompson, S. (2024) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5 · Cited by 25
Rogers, L., & MacCormac, A. C. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106573 · Cited by 26
Devan, H., Perry, M., Yaghoubi, M., & Hale, L. A. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00275-0 · Cited by 25
Micsinszki, S. K., Buettgen, A., Mulvale, G. M., Moll, S. E., Wyndham‐West, M., Bruce, E., Rogerson, K., Murray‐Leung, L., Fleisig, R. V., Park, S., et al. (2021) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/174426421x16366319768599 · Cited by 25
Sherman, K., Pehlivan, M. J., Singleton, A., Hawkey, A., Redfern, J., Armour, M., Dear, B., Duckworth, T., Ciccia, D., Cooper, M., et al. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/40837 · Cited by 17
Mrklas, K., Merali, S., Khan, M., Shergill, S., Boyd, J. M., Nowell, L. S., Pfadenhauer, L. M., Paúl, K., Goertzen, A., Swain, L. A., et al. (2022) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-022-00938-8 · Cited by 25
Schiffler, T., Kapan, A., Gansterer, A., Pass, T., Lehner, L., Gil-Salmerón, A., McDermott, D. T., & Grabovac, I. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20010892 · Cited by 25
van der Graaf, P., Kislov, R., Smith, H. J. J., Langley, J., Hamer, N., Cheetham, M., Wolstenholme, D., Cooke, J., & Mawson, S. (2023) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00385-0 · Cited by 25
Pelly, M. L., Fatehi, F., Liew, D., & Verdejo‐García, A. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105041 · Cited by 25
Goff, A. J., Silva, D. D. O., Ezzat, A. M., Crossley, K. M., Pazzinatto, M. F., Barton, C. J., & Lived Experience Group and Health Professional Group (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231163810 · Cited by 25
Barbancho, B. M., Jiménez, P. A., Mallo, I., Lombroni, I., Cea, G., Nebreda, C. L., Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M. F., Fico, G., & Arredondo, M. T. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176598 · Cited by 24
Backåberg, S., Strandberg, S., Freeman, G., Katz, L., Milajerdi, H. R., Wylant, B., Oehlberg, L., & Ekstedt, M. (2024) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2024.2372595 · Cited by 27
Designing Gender-Responsive Health Promotion Programs for Men: A Scoping Review
Sharp, P., Sankey, C., Oliffe, J. L., Schulenkorf, N., & Caperchione, C. M. (2025) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/10901981251322391 · Cited by 24
Seidler, A. L., Johnson, B. J., Golley, R. K., & Hunter, K. E. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.803545 · Cited by 25
Grand Challenges for Public Health Education and Promotion
Stock, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.917685 · Cited by 24
Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review
McKercher, J. P., Slade, S. C., Jazayeri, J. A., Hodge, A., Knight, M., Green, J., Woods, J. T., Thwaites, C. K., & Morris, M. E. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068241 · Cited by 24
Clinical Pathways for the Identification and Referral for Social Needs: A Systematic Review
Wong-See, H., Calik, A., Ostojic, K., Raman, S., & Woolfenden, S. R. (2023) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2022-056837 · Cited by 23
Five aspects of research waste in biomedicine: A scoping review
Rosengaard, L. O., Andersen, M. Z., Rosenberg, J., & Fonnes, S. (2024) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.12616 · Cited by 24
Nesbitt, K., Beleigoli, A. M. R., Du, H., Tirimacco, R., & Clark, R. A. (2021) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvab127 · Cited by 23
Eyre, H. A., Stirland, L., Jeste, D. V., Reynolds, C. F., Berk, M., Ibáñez, A. M., Dawson, W. D., LAWLOR, B. A., Leroi, I., Yaffe, K. S., et al. (2023) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2023.09.013 · Cited by 23
Nielssen, I., Santana, M., Pokharel, S., Strain, K., Kiryanova, V., Zelinsky, S., Khawaja, Z., Khanna, P., Rychtera, A., & Ambasta, A. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13909 · Cited by 23
Birnie, K. A., Pavlova, M., Neville, A., Noel, M. E., Jordán, I., Jordan, E., Marianayagam, J., Stinson, J., Lorenzetti, D., Faulkner, V., et al. (2021) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002339 · Cited by 23
Children and Young People’s Involvement in Designing Applied Games: Scoping Review
Saiger, M. J., Deterding, S., & Gega, L. (2023) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/42680 · Cited by 24
Gonsalves, P. P., Ansari, S., Berry, C., Gonsalves, F., Iyengar, S., Kashyap, P., Mittal, D., Pal, S., Razdan, E., & Michelson, D. (2024) · Health Education Journal · doi:10.1177/00178969241297821 · Cited by 21
Lawless, M., Archibald, M. M., de Plaza, M. A. P., Drioli-Phillips, P. G., & Kitson, A. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/19834 · Cited by 17
Jesus, T. S., Stern, B. Z., Struhar, J., Deutsch, A. F., & Heinemann, A. W. (2022) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/02692155221126690 · Cited by 21
Klingberg, S., Motlhatlhedi, M., Mabena, G., Mooki, T., Verdezoto, N., Densmore, M., & Norris, S. (2022) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001280 · Cited by 20
Netnography: A novel methodology for nursing research
Smith, S. E., Sivertsen, N., Lines, L. E., & Bellis, A. D. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.15798 · Cited by 21
Marwaa, M. N., Guidetti, S. G. E., Ytterberg, C., & Kristensen, H. K. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00472-z · Cited by 26
Commentary: Strength-based co-design that EMPOWERs – Lessons from codesigning with older adults
Figueiredo, B., Aleti, T., Martin, D. M., Reid, M., Sheahan, J., & Hjorth, L. (2023) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-12-2022-0393 · Cited by 21
Co-designing a theory-informed intervention to increase shared decision-making in maternity care
Waddell, A., Spassova, G., Sampson, L., Jungbluth, L., Dam, J., & Bragge, P. (2023) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-023-00959-x · Cited by 20
Self-citationThirty Years of Research and Methodologies in Value Co-Creation and Co-Design
Avila, C., & Bacca-Acosta, J. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16062360 · Cited by 25
Co-Creation in the Development of Digital Therapeutics: A Narrative Review
Mimoso, I., Figueiredo, T., Midão, L., Carrilho, J., Henriques, D. V., Alves, S., Duarte, N. S. C., Bessa, M. J., Facal-Mayo, D., Felpete, A., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph21121589 · Cited by 20
McGovern, Ó., Glennon, S., Walsh, I., Gallagher, P., & McCashin, D. (2025) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835 · Cited by 20
Simpson, A., Beauchamp, M. R., Dimmock, J. A., Willis, C., & Jackson, B. (2025) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102918 · Cited by 23
Zacharia, K., Patterson, A. J., English, C., Ramage, E. R., Galloway, M. E., Burke, M., Gray, R., & MacDonald‐Wicks, L. K. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13041058 · Cited by 20
Development of the “Kalmer” relaxation intervention: co-design with stroke survivors with aphasia
El-Helou, R., Ryan, B., & Kneebone, I. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2069294 · Cited by 20
Cadel, L., Kuluski, K., Wodchis, W. P., Thavorn, K., & Guilcher, S. J. T. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273038 · Cited by 20
Approaches to co-production of research in care homes: a scoping review
Hallam-Bowles, F., Logan, P., Timmons, S., & Robinson, K. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00408-z · Cited by 20
Istanboulian, L., Rose, L., Yunusova, Y., & Dale, C. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00514-6 · Cited by 20
Gehrke, P., Campbell, K., Tsang, J. L. Y., Hannon, R. A., & Jack, S. M. (2024) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.16135 · Cited by 20
Anantapong, K., Bruun, A., Walford, A., Smith, C. H., Manthorpe, J., Sampson, E. L., & Davies, N. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13672 · Cited by 20
The Right to Rehabilitation for People With Dementia: A Codesign Approach to Barriers and Solutions
Layton, N. A., Devanny, C., Hill, K., Swaffer, K., Russell, G. M., Low, L., Lee, D. A., Cations, M., Skouteris, H., O’Connor, C. M. C., et al. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70036 · Cited by 19
Klompstra, L. V., Strömberg, A., Jaarsma, T., & Hendriks, J. (2024) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvae158 · Cited by 19
Fazlelahi, F. Z., Douglas, E. J., Obschonka, M., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2025) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-025-10188-9 · Cited by 19
Laustsen, C. E., Petersson, P., Westergren, A., & Haak, M. (2021) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-021-00763-5 · Cited by 19
Murfield, J., Moyle, W., & O’Donovan, A. (2022) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-022-02754-9 · Cited by 21
Layton, N. A., Bould, E., Buchanan, R., Bredin, J., & Callaway, L. (2022) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci11060233 · Cited by 19
Rabin, B. A., Cain, K. L., Salgin, L., Watson, P., Oswald, W., Kaiser, B. N., Ayers, L. O., Yi, C., Alegre, A., Ni, J., et al. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15299-2 · Cited by 19
Introducing Quin: The Design and Development of a Prototype Chatbot to Support Smoking Cessation
Bendotti, H., Ireland, D., Lawler, S., Oates, D., GARTNER, C. E., & Marshall, H. (2023) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntad217 · Cited by 19
Dada, S., May, A. A., Bastable, K., Samuels, A. E., Tönsing, K. M., Wilder, J., Casey, M., Ntuli, C., & Reddy, V. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13445 · Cited by 19
Gu, Y., Andargoli, A. E., Mackelprang, J. L., & Meyer, D. (2024) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105416 · Cited by 18
Partridge, S. R., Knight, A., Todd, A., McGill, B., Wardak, S., Alston, L. V., Livingstone, K. M., Singleton, A. C., Thornton, L. K., Jia, S. S., et al. (2024) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13821 · Cited by 18
Creaser, A. V., Bingham, D. D., Bennett, H. A. J., Costa, S., & Clemes, S. A. (2023) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2023.01.018 · Cited by 18
A rapid review of interventions to improve medicine self‐management for older people living at home
Previdoli, G., Cheong, V., Alldred, D. P., Tomlinson, J., Tyndale‐Biscoe, S., Silcock, J., Okeowo, D. A., & Fylan, B. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13729 · Cited by 18
Lee, G. Y., McKenna, S., Song, Y. J. C., Hutcheon, A., Hockey, S. J., Laidler, R., Occhipinti, J., Perry, C., Lindsay‐Smith, T., Ramsay, A., et al. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13777 · Cited by 18
Optimizing clinical nutrition research: the role of adaptive and pragmatic trials
Orsso, C. E., Ford, K. L., Kiss, N. K., Trujillo, E. B., Spees, C., Hamilton‐Reeves, J. M., & Prado, C. M. M. (2023) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-023-01330-7 · Cited by 19
Scholten, S., Schemer, L., Herzog, P., Haas, J. W., Heider, J., Winter, D., Reis, D., & Glombiewski, J. A. (2024) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-024-01363-5 · Cited by 19
Service Design as a Catalyst for Patient-Centered eHealth Innovation
Nyatuka, D. R., & de la Harpe, R. (2021) · International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design · doi:10.4018/ijismd.20210701.oa1 · Cited by 17
A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study
Dennett, A. M., Tang, C. Y., Chiu, A., Osadnik, C. R., Granger, C. L., Taylor, N. F., Campbell, K. L., & Barton, C. J. (2022) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/34903 · Cited by 17
Kinchin, I., Edwards, L. M., Adrion, E., Chen, Y. S., Ashour, A. A., Leroi, I., Brugulat‐Serrat, A., Phillips, J. L., Masterson, F., & Kochovska, S. (2022) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.5764 · Cited by 17
Ashall, V. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13101662 · Cited by 17
Hine, R. H., Gladstone, B., Reupert, A., O’Dea, L., Cuff, R., Yates, S., Hagström, A. S., McGaw, V. E., & Foster, K. (2023) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323231211454 · Cited by 17
Co-Designing Remote Patient Monitoring Technologies for Inpatients: Systematic Review
Sumner, J., Tan, S. Y., Wang, Y., Keck, C., Lee, E. W. X., Chew, E. H. H., & Yip, A. W. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/58144 · Cited by 17
Lu, W., Li, Y., Montayre, J., Li, M., Ho, K. Y., Li, J., & Yorke, J. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13030305 · Cited by 18
Grubb, M., Golden, A., Withers, A., Vellone, D. A., Young, A., & McLachlan, K. (2021) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.14657 · Cited by 20
Hoekstra, F., Schaefer, L., Athanasopoulos, P., & Gainforth, H. L. (2021) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.35 · Cited by 17
Quinn, L. M., Shukla, D., Greenfield, S., Barrett, T. G., Garstang, J. J., Boardman, F., Litchfield, I. J., Dayan, C. M., Gardner, C., Connop, C., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002750 · Cited by 18
Low, C., Namasivayam, P., & Barnett, T. (2022) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163221132089 · Cited by 16
Carrotte, E. R., Hopgood, F., Blanchard, M., Groot, C., & Phillips, L. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/44412 · Cited by 16
Russell, R., Black, L. J., Purdue, J., Daly, A., & Begley, A. M. (2023) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2023.2186499 · Cited by 16
Papachristou, N., Kartsidis, P. E., Anagnostopoulou, A., Marshall, R., Kotronoulas, G., Collantes, G., Valdivieso, B., Santaballa, A., Conde-Moreno, A. J., Domenech, J. R., et al. (2023) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151437 · Cited by 17
Farré, A., Fang, M. L., Hannah, E. F. S., Makita, M., McFadden, A., Menezes, D. C., Rodríguez, A., Sixsmith, J., & Gray, N. M. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231185442 · Cited by 16
Opozda, M. J., Oxlad, M., Turnbull, D. A., Gupta, H., Smith, J. A., Ziesing, S., Nankivell, M. E., & Wittert, G. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.015 · Cited by 18
Lynch, E. A., Bulto, L. N., West, M., Cadilhac, D. A.-M., Cooper, F., & Harvey, G. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13904 · Cited by 16
Empowering Young Women: A Qualitative Co-Design Study of a Social Media Health Promotion Programme
Malloy, J. A., Kemper, J. A., Partridge, S. R., & Roy, R. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16060780 · Cited by 16
Co-design personal sleep health technology for and with university students
Liang, Z.-L., Melcer, E., Khotchasing, K., & Hoang, N. (2024) · Frontiers Digit. Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1371808 · Cited by 17
Hanegraaf, L., Anderson, A. C., Neill, E., Giddens, E., Boon, E. S. K., Bryant, E., Calvert, S., Carroll, B., Fernández‐Aranda, F., Ikin, S., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.24304 · Cited by 16
Harrison, R., Walton, M., Manias, E., Wilson, C. J., Girgis, A., Chin, M. T. M., Leone, D., Seale, H., Smith, A. B., & Chauhan, A. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048389 · Cited by 16
Adapting Experience‐Based Co‐Design to Disability Research: Co‐Producing the CycLink Co‐Design Study
Carey, J. J., Spittle, A. J., Imms, C., Shields, N., Wallen, M. A., O’Keefe, F., Yates, M. J., Skilbeck, H., & Toovey, R. A. M. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70276 · Cited by 15
Evaluating co-design approaches with parents in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review
Suna, J. M., Tanti, D., Merlo, G., Bryant, P. A., McMullan, B. J., Hall, L., & the HOMEFREE Study Group (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13495-x · Cited by 15
O’Donnell, D., O’Donoghue, G., Shé, É. N., O’Shea, M., & Donnelly, S. (2022) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2022.2075332 · Cited by 15
The Melbourne Statement on Practice Research in Social Work: Practice Meets Research
Joubert, L., Webber, M., Uggerhøj, L., Julkunen, I., Yliruka, L., Hampson, R., Simpson, G. K., Sim, T., Manguy, A.-M., & Austin, M. J. (2023) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/10497315221139835 · Cited by 15
Nesbitt, K., Beleigoli, A. M. R., Champion, S., Gebremichael, L. G., Bulamu, N. B., Tirimacco, R., & Clark, R. A. (2023) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvad026 · Cited by 15
Sanmugalingham, G., Mok, É., Cafazzo, J. A., Desveaux, L., Brazeau, A., Booth, G. L., Greenberg, M., Kichler, J., Rac, V. E., Austin, P. C., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071396 · Cited by 15
Lusambili, A. M., Khaemba, P., Agoi, F., Oguna, M., Nakstad, B., Scorgie, F., Filippi, V., Hess, J. J., Roos, N., Chersich, M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1146048 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., & Bragge, P.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Slattery, Peter
- Venue
- Health Research Policy and Systems
- Published
- 2020-02-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7014755
- OpenAlex
- W3008652539
- Cited by
- 1,313
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 259 · 2025: 311 · 2024: 315 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Research Policy and Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Transport Accident Commission
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- research co-design, end-user involvement, patient and public involvement, research waste, learning planning, research engagement
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Research Design, Biomedical Research, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
