The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Billions of dollars are lost annually in health research that fails to create meaningful benefits for patients. Engaging in research co-design – the meaningful involvement of end-users in research – may help address this research waste. This rapid overview of reviews addressed three related questions, namely (1) what approaches to research co-design exist in health settings? (2) What activities do these research co-design approaches involve? (3) What do we know about the effectiveness of existing research co-design approaches? The review focused on the study planning phase of research, defined as the point up to which the research question and study design are finalised. Methods: Reviews of research co-design were systematically identified using a rapid overview of reviews approach (PROSPERO: CRD42019123034). The search strategy encompassed three academic databases, three grey literature databases, and a hand-search of the journal Research Involvement and Engagement . Two reviewers independently conducted the screening and data extraction and resolved disagreements through discussion. Disputes were resolved through discussion with a senior author (PB). One reviewer performed quality assessment. The results were narratively synthesised. Results: A total of 26 records (reporting on 23 reviews) met the inclusion criteria. Reviews varied widely in their application of ‘research co-design’ and their application contexts, scope and theoretical foci. The research co-design approaches identified involved interactions with end-users outside of study planning, such as recruitment and dissemination. Activities involved in research co-design included focus groups, interviews and surveys. The effectiveness of research co-design has rarely been evaluated empirically or experimentally; however, qualitative exploration has described the positive and negative outcomes associated with co-design. The research provided many recommendations for conducting research co-design, including training participating end-users in research skills, having regular communication between researchers and end-users, setting clear end-user expectations, and assigning set roles to all parties involved in co-design. Conclusions: Research co-design appears to be widely used but seldom described or evaluated in detail. Though it has rarely been tested empirically or experimentally, existing research suggests that it can benefit researchers, practitioners, research processes and research outcomes. Realising the potential of research co-design may require the development of clearer and more consistent terminology, better reporting of the activities involved and better evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite the rise in popularity and continued growth of youth engagement in health research, systematic and deliberate theory‐building has been limited.”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Given the near‐unanimous recognition that the biggest gap in this area of research is the lack of evidence on impact gained through rigorous evaluation, 43 , 57 , 58 , 61 , 90 the small number of impact‐focused models and frameworks is noteworthy.”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with review findings of empirical studies in PPI whereby short‐term, individual‐level outcomes were more represented in the literature. 43 , 91 , 92”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · cited 1×
“For example, the Fogg Behaviour Model [53] or the COM-B Behaviour Change model [54] could be used to diagnose actors’ capabilities, motivation, and triggers or opportunities.”
MethodDevelopment of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 · Cited by 4,374
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 · Cited by 3,469
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. G. (2014) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 · Cited by 2,700
A behavior model for persuasive design
Fogg, B. (2009) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology · doi:10.1145/1541948.1541999 · Cited by 2,328
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60329-9 · Cited by 2,208
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3453 · Cited by 1,983
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Oliver S, Gray J. A bibliography of research reports about patients’, clinicians’ and researchers’ priorities for new research. London: James Lind Alliance; 2006.
- Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research World Health Organization; 2017.
- Veritas health innovation covidence systematic review software. Melbourne.https://www.covidence.org/home. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.
- INVOLVE. Guidance on co-producing a research project. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2018.
- INVOLVE. Co-production in action: number one. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2019.
- Algate F, Gallagher R, Nguyen S, Ruda S, Sanders M (2014) EAST: four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. https://www.bi.team/publications/east-four-simple-ways-to-apply-behavioural-insights/. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Magrassi, A. O., Collado, A., Hicks, L. M., Hubley, S. H., Bauer, D., & Dimidjian, S. (2026) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-026-01692-2 · Cited by 1
Sprajcer, M. A., Kovac, K., Thomas, M. J. W., Ferguson, S. A., Gupta, C., Bachmann, A., Miller, D. J., Thorne, H., Bishop, B. C., & Vincent, G. E. (2026) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1002/hpja.70237 · Cited by 1
Supporting the Creation and Evaluation of Interactive Touch Kiosks Designed for the Elderly
Leite, C. V., Nunes, S., & Almeida, A. M. P. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences · doi:10.1145/3505284.3532979 · Cited by 1
Lock, M., Campbell, N., & Spelten, E. R. (2022) · Australian Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/ajr.12947 · Cited by 1
Melcer, E. F., Liebert, C. A., Shields, S., Keehl, O. G., Tsai, J., Camacho, F., Eddington, H., Trickey, A. W., Lee, M. C., Merrell, S. B., et al. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33338-5_5 · Cited by 1
Phillips, H., Renda, G., & McDonald, R. L. (2023) · International Association of Societies of Design Research Congress (IASDR) · doi:10.21606/iasdr.2023.190 · Cited by 1
Claessens, F., der Auwera, C. V., Seys, D., Ridder, D. J. M. K. D., Wilder, A. V., & Vanhaecht, K. (2024) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzae035 · Cited by 1
Ottesen, H., Alvesson, H. M., Hagren, J. I., Martinell, M., Matta, L., McAleenan, P., & Daivadanam, M. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090448 · Cited by 1
Holme, C., & Clark, A. A. (2024) · Research for All · doi:10.14324/rfa.09.1.02 · Cited by 1
Wood, H. A., Brand, G., Clifford, R. M., Lee, K., Stiles, S., & Seubert, L. (2024) · Health Literacy and Communication Open · doi:10.1080/28355245.2024.2445713 · Cited by 1
Chen, J., Collins, J. C., Scanlan, J. N., McCloughen, A., Howard, R., Ashton-James, C. E., O’Reilly, C. L., Moles, R. J., Ung, T. X., Schneider, C. R., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06580-y · Cited by 1
Logan, G. S., Benedictson, J., Reynolds, K., Penner, K. E., & El-Gabalawy, R. M. (2025) · Journal of Medical Extended Reality · doi:10.1089/jmxr.2024.0042 · Cited by 1
Turner, G., Calvert, M., Foy, R., Atkins, L., Collis, P., Tearne, S., Jowett, S. M., Handley, K., & Mant, J. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317425 · Cited by 1
Ganann, R., Phillips, S. M., Neil‐Sztramko, S., Fisher, K., Alvarez, E., Kuspinar, A., Newbold, K. B., Moore, C., MacNeil, M., Keller, H., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1555222 · Cited by 1
Kwah, K., Bartle, N. C., Sharps, M. A., Choudhry, K., Blissett, J. M., & Brown, K. A. (2025) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.70019 · Cited by 1
Faraday, J., Abley, C., Crook, D., Exley, C., Patterson, J. M., & Moynihan, P. J. (2025) · Journal of Long-Term Care · doi:10.31389/jltc.362 · Cited by 1
Freene, N., Martin, A. O., Flood, A., Bousie, J. A., & Ball, N. B. (2025) · Health Education Journal · doi:10.1177/00178969251344397 · Cited by 1
Kearney, L. N., Jenkinson, B., Lehner, C., Eley, V. A., Marsh, N. M., August, D. L., de Jersey, S., & Lee, N. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70438 · Cited by 1
Beauchamp, A., Hilbers, J., Cvetanovska, N., Shee, A. W., Horvat, L., Rogers, S. L., Cooper, A., Flemming-Judge, E., Rawlinson, S., & Jessup, R. L. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/77263 · Cited by 1
Shrestha, R., Paudel, S., Rijal, A., Adhikari, T. B., Khatri, B., Dhakal, L., Neupane, D., Dahal, K., Nielsen, R. Ø., Skejø, S., et al. (2025) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-025-01788-w · Cited by 1
Hoe, C. V., Moureau, L., Boterman, S., Debersaques, J., Magerman, J., Westen, K., Liégeois, A., Zomer, L. J. C., & Chambaere, K. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-026-15383-4 · Cited by 1
Physical activity interventions in women treated for endometrial cancer: a scoping review
Shearsmith, L., Truscott, H., Fisher, A., Traviss‐Turner, G., Crosbie, E. J., Hill, A. J., & Beeken, R. J. (2025) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-025-01938-7 · Cited by 1
Exploring medical co-design in the AI era: A scoping review
Jiang, Y. N., Chen, J., Liu, L., & Clarkson, P. J. (2025) · Design and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.daai.2025.100040 · Cited by 1
Wood, C. P., Lindvig, K., Hillersdal, L., & Earle, D. (2025) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.143839 · Cited by 1
Mannix, S., & Albury, K. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13970-5 · Cited by 1
Understanding stigma through camera-based mobile apps: studies on visually impaired users
Niu, L., Manohar, A. K., Ning, W., & Dong, H. (2026) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2025.2610363 · Cited by 1
Wilson, M. V., Davis, A., BRAITHWAITE, F., Arnold, J. B., Gwilt, I., Campbell, S., Porton, J., Petropoulos, O., & Stanton, T. R. (2026) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106193 · Cited by 1
Multi-PDAI: integrating multimodal GenAI models for participatory design
Wang, L., Yang, Z., & Yu, C. (2026) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2026.2617789 · Cited by 1
Christison, L., Railton, R., Glassey, R., Makirere-Haerewa, R., Tipene‐Leach, D., & Swinburn, B. A. (2026) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/71833 · Cited by 1
Amma, Y. A., Abdullah, A. Z., Nasir, S., Pulubuhu, D. A. T., Razak, A., Ibnu, I. F., & Syamsuddin, S. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251414504 · Cited by 1
Luciani, B. D., Alwan, A., Carlson, M., McNally, G. A., Hackney, M. E., Crasta, J. E., Schnell, P., Lustberg, M. B., & Worthen‐Chaudhari, L. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09486-w · Cited by 1
Barber, B. V., Somerville, M., Vanderhout, S. M., Ladak, Z., Garies, S., Sequeira, L., Sinclair, D., Cassidy, C. E., & Marshall, D. A. (2026) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-026-01459-4 · Cited by 1
Watson, E., Afrin, S., Long, K. M., Giebel, C. M., Moran, C., & Ayton, D. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70601 · Cited by 1
Hernandez‐Sanchez, D., Kazantceva, A., Nizam, A., Salehi, Z., Knot, M., Watkins, A. R., Ruel, M., Sukhai, M. A., & Alarcon, E. I. (2026) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2026.2635508 · Cited by 1
Swinkels, E., van den Berg, G. H., Magnée, M., Pelgrum-Keurhorst, M. N., Waal, G. H., & van Gaal, B. G. I. (2026) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-026-02064-6 · Cited by 1
“Moving sands of power?” – power dynamics in co-design practices with older adults
Rießenberger, K. A., Wörle, T., Neves, B. B., & Fischer, F. (2026) · International Journal of Ageing and Later Life · doi:10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.5712 · Cited by 1
Davis, A., Shiggins, C., Lipson‐Smith, R., Davey, J., White, M. R., & Bernhardt, J. A. (2026) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2026.2623504 · Cited by 1
Munoz-Novoa, M., Guo, L., Björkquist, A., Kristoffersen, M., Khorramshahi, P., Sandsjö, L., & Murphy, M. A. (2026) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/77999 · Cited by 1
Nielsen, S., Fox, F., Lam, T., Waddell, A., Jung, M., Rowland, B., Watterson, J., Basur, D., Prawira, C. O., Seguin, J. P., et al. (2026) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.70412 · Cited by 1
Salisbury, T. T., Chissale, F., Hanselmann, M., Langat, E. C., Kinja, S., Yebei, V. N., Nyalumbe, M., Lilumbi, M., Magestade, A., Bessitala, M., et al. (2026) · The Lancet Regional Health - Africa · doi:10.1016/j.lanafr.2026.100048 · Cited by 1
Mohammadi, S., Cai, A., Cathcart, H. F., Pagé, B., Pauly, E., Erlander, B., Robillard, J. M., Whitehurst, D. G. T., & Miller, W. C. (2026) · Occupational Therapy In Health Care · doi:10.1080/07380577.2026.2667520 · Cited by 1
Gillespie, K. M., Purtell, L., Finderup, J., Schjerning, N., & Bonner, A. (2026) · Journal of Renal Care · doi:10.1111/jorc.70063 · Cited by 1
Kierkegaard, L., Bonnesen, C. T., Carlsson, R. R., Pedersen, T. P., Rasmussen, M., Ahlmark, N., & Krølner, R. F. (2026) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-026-01486-1 · Cited by 1
Ahmed, S. M., Dorey, E. S., Smith, D., Weatherall, L., Friday, R., Massi, L., Rooney, R., Hermith‐Ramirez, D., Kendall, E., Wheeler, K., et al. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113766 · Cited by 1
Co-designing wearables: The importance of enabling a lack of consensus within the design process
Ankeny, U. (2026) · The Design Journal · doi:10.1080/14606925.2026.2684710 · Cited by 1
Batchelor, F., Williams, S., O’Connor, D., Dow, B., Catrice, A., Dopierala, W., White, P., Murray, M., Chong, T. W. H., Hutchinson, A. M., et al. (2026) · Australian Journal on Ageing · doi:10.1111/ajag.70193 · Cited by 1
Casey, M. M., Porter, J. E., & Eime, R. (2026) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1002/hpja.70217 · Cited by 1
Batterham, P. J., Gulliver, A., Heffernan, C., Calear, A. L., Werner‐Seidler, A., Turner, A., Farrer, L. M., Chatterton, M. L., Mihalopoulos, C., Gendi, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/89215 · Cited by 1
Quasdorf, T., Brenner, S., Kramer, I., Basinska, K., & Gutenberg, J. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-123820 · Cited by 1
Research with children and youth
Waters, D. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108980944.006 · Cited by 1
Fostering ethical reflection on health data research through co-design: A pilot study
Sleigh, J., & Amann, J. (2022) · International Journal of Ethics Education · doi:10.1007/s40889-022-00148-4 · Cited by 1
Building patient-oriented research capacity by co-designing a research handbook for patient partners
McCutcheon, T., LaPlante, J., Bibeau, C., Cooper, L., Hammond, J., Helmer‐Smith, M., Houghton, D., Burns, K. K., Mastin, D., Turner, K., et al. (2022) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.001 · Cited by 1
'Do Not Give Up On Us’: a workshop guide for health promotion and civic engagement
Rodriguez, A., Dalcin, C. B., & van Blerk, L. (2022) · University of Dundee eBooks · doi:10.20933/100001261 · Cited by 1
Collective Action for Wellness in the Malaysian Workplace: Protocol for a Feasibility Study
Thai, Y. C., McCaffrey, T. A., Ramadas, A., Chandrasekara, D., Koh, S. G. M., Choi, T. S. T., Malini, H., Xie, J., Olivier, P. L., Zain, A. Z. M., et al. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/39238 · Cited by 3
Gaiotto, E. M. G., Trapé, C. A., Soares, C. B., Souza, N. M., & Narciso, K. R. D. S. (2023) · Interface - Comunicação Saúde Educação · doi:10.1590/interface.230166 · Cited by 1
Dimond, R., Stephens, N., & Herbrand, C. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116333 · Cited by 1
Co-Designing an Accessible Gym: Inviting ‘Others’ to the Public
Hong, S., Park, J., & Park, W. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192537 · Cited by 1
How the expert nursing role was used to facilitate the co-design of a patient interview study
Kittscha, J., Wilson, V., Fairbrother, G., & Bliokas, V. V. (2024) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.2024.e1918 · Cited by 1
Capiau, M., Macq, J., & Thunus, S. (2024) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-024-01112-y · Cited by 1
Dolgoy, N. D., Bernard, S., Huang, F., Driga, A., Hall-Lavoie, D. M., Brown, A., Pituskin, E., Fairchild, A. M., & McNeely, M. L. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00566-2 · Cited by 1
Bourne, J. E., Kelly, P., & Armstrong, M. E. G. (2024) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/54785 · Cited by 1
Codesigning youth diversion programmes with community-led organisations: a case study
Walker, S. C., Cunningham, K. A., Gilbert, E. J., Norman, L., Worthy, S., & Holand, K. (2024) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/17442648y2024d000000029 · Cited by 1
Marshall, C. A., Holmes, J., Todd, E., Panter, G., Plett, P., Easton, C., Perez, S., Landry, T., Collins, S., Jastak, M., et al. (2024) · International Journal on Homelessness · doi:10.5206/ijoh.2023.3.17806 · Cited by 1
Best, G., Morunga, E., Wells, A., Allison, J., & Reynolds, L. (2024) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2024.2397427 · Cited by 1
Co-Designing Caregiver Support Groups: Rapid Review with a Non-Profit Organization
Hall, S., Leeder, E., Macala, L., White, J., & Hazel, M. (2024) · Activities Adaptation & Aging · doi:10.1080/01924788.2024.2410087 · Cited by 1
Rheinberger, D., Boydell, K., Armstrong, S. O., Pollard, S. A., Lessing, J., McGillivray, L., & Shand, F. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70775 · Cited by 1
RM, R. S., Hoang, V., Murphy, E. M. A., Turner, B., Juszczyk, K., Barnes, J., Parange, A., & Rm, J. T. (2025) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151913 · Cited by 1
Fletcher, E., Sherriff, A., Duijster, D., de Jong‐Lenters, M., & Ross, A. J. (2025) · Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/cdoe.13031 · Cited by 1
Curran, J., McCulloch, H., Breneol, S., King, S., Sheriko, J., Pidduck, J., Balsor, D., Clegg, J., Best, S., Burgess, S., et al. (2025) · Paediatrics & Child Health · doi:10.1093/pch/pxae058 · Cited by 1
Developing a preconception medical record audit tool for general practice: a multimethod study
Withanage, N. N., Botfield, J. R., James, S., Black, K. I., Cameron, S. T., & Mazza, D. (2025) · Australian Journal of Primary Health · doi:10.1071/py24132 · Cited by 1
Ofanoa, M., Tu’akoi, S., Ofanoa, S., & Goodyear‐Smith, F. (2025) · Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.1071/hc25077 · Cited by 1
Parry, N. J., Catling, C., & Cummins, A. M. (2025) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101958 · Cited by 1
Designing EdTech tools using a codesign model: a multi-stakeholder design case
Mavri, A., Ioannou, A., & Kitsis, A. (2025) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2025.2540928 · Cited by 3
Hudson, K., Burton, B., Worthy, P., Isaacs, M. L., Shrubsole, K., Palmer, V. J., Ng, Z. Y., Copland, D. A., Angwin, A. J., Wiles, J., et al. (2025) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1071/ib24127 · Cited by 1
Goff, R., Boz, T., Craik, C., Watson, J., Martin, R., Cordoba, P. S., & Egan, R. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251392408 · Cited by 1
Hoepner, J. K., Anderson, R., Campbell, D., Kidd, D. E., Monopoli, L., Nelson, A., Nelson, S., Paulson, K., Kirkwood, A., Costello, E., et al. (2025) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1071/ib24150 · Cited by 1
Chew, K. A., Fraser, E. E., Chau, T., Brokenshire, C., Persson, P., Cazanis, A., Carminati, J.-Y. J., Bain, M., Davidson, J., West, D., et al. (2025) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1071/ib24143 · Cited by 1
Bandiera, C., Ross, X. S., Cardoso, E., Wagner, D., Csajka, C., Olver, I., Patterson, P., Suppiah, V., Gunn, K. M., & Schneider, M. P. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06710-y · Cited by 1
Ikwue, U., Coker, J. O., Uzougbo, N. S., & Oguejiofor, B. B. (2023) · SOCIO ECONOMY AND POLICY STUDIES · doi:10.26480/seps.02.2023.98.108 · Cited by 1
Richardson, K. A., Punke, E., Dabrowski, B., Teply, A. L., Walker, J., & McKibbin, C. L. (2024) · Journal of Prevention · doi:10.1007/s10935-024-00773-3 · Cited by 1
Dang, T. H., Ludlow, C., Borle, H., Alexander, M., Wickramasinghe, N. S., Burbury, K., Jayaraman, P. P., & Schofield, P. E. (2024) · PEC Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100335 · Cited by 1
Elphinston, R. A., Pager, S., Brown, K., Sterling, M. M., Fatehi, F., Gray, P. D., Hipper, L., Cahill, L., & Connor, J. P. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/57208 · Cited by 1
How learning designers work with teachers
Kickbusch, S. (2022) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.235922 · Cited by 1
Lukersmith, S., Salvador‐Carulla, L., Woods, C., Niyonsenga, T., Gutiérrez-Colosía, M. R., Mohanty, I., GARCÍA-ALONSO, C. R., Díaz-Milanés, D., Pérez, J. A. S., Davey, R., et al. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4008980/v1 · Cited by 1
Cook‐Cottone, C. P., & Anderson, L. K. (2024) · Eating Disorders · doi:10.1080/10640266.2024.2347699 · Cited by 1
Nollett, C. L., Cooke, P., Labbett, S., Margrain, T. H., & Thurston, M. (2024) · British Journal of Visual Impairment · doi:10.1177/02646196241250210 · Cited by 1
Exploring food and settlement for people with lived refugee experiences
Gingell, T. (2024) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.248583 · Cited by 1
Liem, A., Verghis, S., & Su, T. T. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fpsqt · Cited by 1
Editorial: Co-design of rehabilitation programming
Unger, J., Wolfe, D. L., Bourke, J., & Middleton, J. W. (2025) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2024.1537063 · Cited by 1
Gamble, A. R., Ferreira, G. E., Maher, C. G., Anderson, D., Hutton, J. M., de Campos, T. F., Macpherson, S., Han, C. S., Sawan, M. J., Harris, I. A., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.10.15.25338120 · Cited by 1
Griffith, S., Swaryandini, G., McKee, L., Oxnard, K. L., Cahill, L. S., Forbes, H., Rees, K., Davis, J., Sanders, T., Coleman, J. A., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.04.27.26351794 · Cited by 1
Littlewood, R., Canfell, O. J., & Walker, J. L. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10487-4
Press, V. G., & Lugogo, N. L. (2021) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.015
Boden, C., & Gerrard, A. (2021) · Evidence Based Library and Information Practice · doi:10.18438/eblip29997
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108980944.002
PROLIFERATE: An adaptable framework to evaluate participatory research productsPreprint
de Plaza, M. A. P., Archibald, M. M., Lawless, M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Mudd, A., McMillan, P., & Kitson, A. A. (2021) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-173744/v1
PROLIFERATE: An adaptable framework to evaluate participatory research productsPreprint
de Plaza, M. A. P., Archibald, M. M., Lawless, M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Mudd, A., McMillan, P., & Kitson, A. A. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-146129/v2
Metadata
- Authors
- Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., & Bragge, P.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Slattery, Peter
- Venue
- Health Research Policy and Systems
- Published
- 2020-02-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7014755
- OpenAlex
- W3008652539
- Cited by
- 1,313
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 259 · 2025: 311 · 2024: 315 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Research Policy and Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Transport Accident Commission
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- research co-design, end-user involvement, patient and public involvement, research waste, learning planning, research engagement
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Research Design, Biomedical Research, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
