Cited by 1,313Mental Health and Patient InvolvementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCommunity Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews

Open access

Slattery, Peter, Saeri, Alexander K., Bragge, Peter·2020·Health Research Policy and Systems

DOI 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9PMC PMC7014755

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Background: Billions of dollars are lost annually in health research that fails to create meaningful benefits for patients. Engaging in research co-design – the meaningful involvement of end-users in research – may help address this research waste. This rapid overview of reviews addressed three related questions, namely (1) what approaches to research co-design exist in health settings? (2) What activities do these research co-design approaches involve? (3) What do we know about the effectiveness of existing research co-design approaches? The review focused on the study planning phase of research, defined as the point up to which the research question and study design are finalised. Methods: Reviews of research co-design were systematically identified using a rapid overview of reviews approach (PROSPERO: CRD42019123034). The search strategy encompassed three academic databases, three grey literature databases, and a hand-search of the journal Research Involvement and Engagement . Two reviewers independently conducted the screening and data extraction and resolved disagreements through discussion. Disputes were resolved through discussion with a senior author (PB). One reviewer performed quality assessment. The results were narratively synthesised. Results: A total of 26 records (reporting on 23 reviews) met the inclusion criteria. Reviews varied widely in their application of ‘research co-design’ and their application contexts, scope and theoretical foci. The research co-design approaches identified involved interactions with end-users outside of study planning, such as recruitment and dissemination. Activities involved in research co-design included focus groups, interviews and surveys. The effectiveness of research co-design has rarely been evaluated empirically or experimentally; however, qualitative exploration has described the positive and negative outcomes associated with co-design. The research provided many recommendations for conducting research co-design, including training participating end-users in research skills, having regular communication between researchers and end-users, setting clear end-user expectations, and assigning set roles to all parties involved in co-design. Conclusions: Research co-design appears to be widely used but seldom described or evaluated in detail. Though it has rarely been tested empirically or experimentally, existing research suggests that it can benefit researchers, practitioners, research processes and research outcomes. Realising the potential of research co-design may require the development of clearer and more consistent terminology, better reporting of the activities involved and better evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Fig. 1 PRISMA flow diagram for rapid overview of reviews in health research co-designCC BY · PubMed Central

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · cited 1×
“For example, the Fogg Behaviour Model [53] or the COM-B Behaviour Change model [54] could be used to diagnose actors’ capabilities, motivation, and triggers or opportunities.”
Method
Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 · Cited by 4,374
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 · Cited by 3,469
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. G. (2014) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 · Cited by 2,700
A behavior model for persuasive design
Fogg, B. (2009) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology · doi:10.1145/1541948.1541999 · Cited by 2,328
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60329-9 · Cited by 2,208
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: Tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3453 · Cited by 1,983

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

Oliver S, Gray J. A bibliography of research reports about patients’, clinicians’ and researchers’ priorities for new research. London: James Lind Alliance; 2006.
Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research World Health Organization; 2017.
Veritas health innovation covidence systematic review software. Melbourne.https://www.covidence.org/home. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.
INVOLVE. Guidance on co-producing a research project. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2018.
INVOLVE. Co-production in action: number one. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2019.
Algate F, Gallagher R, Nguyen S, Ruda S, Sanders M (2014) EAST: four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. https://www.bi.team/publications/east-four-simple-ways-to-apply-behavioural-insights/. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,000

Travelers’ perceptions of jetlag and travel fatigue: A scoping review
Beh, S. F., Lee, S. K. M., Bin, Y. S., & Cheung, J. M. Y. (2022) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.1080/07420528.2022.2072224 · Cited by 7
Consumer engagement and patient reported outcomes in perioperative clinical trials in Australia: a systematic review
Wallace, S. K. A., Goulding, K. R., & Myles, P. S. (2022) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.17897 · Cited by 7
Rural health service leaders co‐design state‐wide research addressing an emerging health issue: A case report
Field, M. J., Buccheri, A., King, O., Bishop, J. L., Shee, A. W., Imran, D., Jacobs, J., Versace, V. L., Isaacs, A. N., Sutton, K., et al. (2022) · Australian Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/ajr.12915 · Cited by 7
Barriers that prevent adults living with HBV infection from participating in clinical research: experience from South Africa
Mofokeng, N. J., Maponga, T. G., Schalkwyk, M. V., Hugo, S., Morobadi, M. D., Vawda, S., Badenhorst, L., van Vuuren, C., Rensburg, C. V., Preiser, W., et al. (2023) · Journal of Virus Eradication · doi:10.1016/j.jve.2023.100317 · Cited by 7
Interventions to Promote Food Allergy Literacy in Childhood: A Systematic Scoping Review
Sanagavarapu, P., Dadich, A., & Hussain, W. (2023) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.13310 · Cited by 7
Requirements for Brazilian Outpatient Centers of Excellence in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Consensus Co-Creative Study
Bellei, E. A., Shirozaki, M. E. M., Puglia, A. L. P., de Carvalho, A. V. E., Riquena, B., Vallilo, C. C., de Barros, D. H., Tamashiro, E. Y., Cintra, G., Duarte, G. V., et al. (2023) · Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology · doi:10.2147/ccid.s420750 · Cited by 7
Co-design with Integrated Care Teams: Establishing Information Needs
White, P. J., Casey, B. P., Cleary, O., Finn, E., O’Connor, K., & Coen, N. (2023) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.7618 · Cited by 9
Characteristics of contemporary health research practice: A shift from ivory tower to collaborative power
Wadsworth, D., Craswell, A., Ward, A., Tulloch, K., Schaumberg, M. A., Stoner, L. R., Meredith, P. J., & Askew, C. D. (2024) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvae006 · Cited by 7
Accounting for complexity – Intervention design in the context of studying social accountability for reproductive health
McMullen, H., Boydell, V., Cordero, J. P., Steyn, P. S., Kiarie, J. N., Kinemo, P., Monyo, A., Addah, M. A., Ahuno, J. T., & Gyamfi, O.-B. (2021) · Gates Open Research · doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.13260.1 · Cited by 7
Air travellers’ experiences and understanding of jetlag and perceptions of management strategies: a qualitative study
Beh, S. F., Holdik, E. N., Bin, Y. S., & Cheung, J. M. Y. (2021) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2021.1980112 · Cited by 7
A scoping review of the globally available tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts
Mrklas, K., Boyd, J. M., Shergill, S., Merali, S., Khan, M., Moser, C., Nowell, L. S., Goertzen, A., Swain, L. A., Pfadenhauer, L. M., et al. (2023) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-023-00958-y · Cited by 7
Co-design with affect stories and applied ethics for health technologies
Davat, A., Martin-Juchat, F., & Ménissier, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2024.1327711 · Cited by 6
Co‐designing The Healthy Gut Diet for Preventing Gestational Diabetes: Co‐design methods and process outcomes
Meloncelli, N. J. L., Wilkinson, S. A., Rushton, A., Pateman, K., Gallaher, S., O'CONNOR, H. M., Kearney, L. N., & de Jersey, S. (2024) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.13341 · Cited by 7
Co‐Creation in Research: Further Reflections From the ‘Co‐Creating Safe Spaces’ Project
Fitzpatrick, S. J., Lamb, H., Oldman, E., Giugni, M., Chakouch, C., Morse, A. R., Gulliver, A., Stewart, E., Stride Safe Space and Safe Haven Team, Oni, H. T., et al. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70103 · Cited by 6
Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Co-Designed and Co-Created Healthy Lifestyle Social Media Intervention Programme the Daily Health Coach for Young Women: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
Malloy, J. A., Partridge, S. R., Kemper, J. A., Braakhuis, A. J., & Roy, R. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16244364 · Cited by 6
Co-designing interventions to improve emergency department discharge communication with youths, parents and healthcare providers: a process evaluation
Gallant, A. J., Curran, J., Somerville, M., Wozney, L., Cassidy, C. E., Delahunty‐Pike, A., Mackay, R., MacPhee, S., Burns, E., Wong, H. W. L., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100362 · Cited by 6
Patient and public involvement in the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease: a statement of the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions of the ESC and the ESC Patient Forum
Hendriks, J., McGreavy, P., Fredericks, S., Jones, I., Ainslie, J., Gomes, A. F., & Sanders, J. (2026) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf191 · Cited by 6
Interventions to Improve the Cast Removal Experience for Children and Their Families: A Scoping Review
Maharjan, P., Murdock, D., Tielemans, N., Goodall, N., Temple, B., Askin, N., & Wittmeier, K. D. M. (2021) · Children · doi:10.3390/children8020130 · Cited by 6
Patient partenaire et éducation thérapeutique en cancerologie
Bourmaud, A., de Villars, E. P., & Renault-Tessier, É. (2021) · Bulletin du Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.09.016 · Cited by 6
iPrevent: Engaging youth as long-acting HIV prevention product co-researchers in Cape Town, South Africa
Hartmann, M., Minnis, A. M., Krogstad, E. A., Ndwayana, S., Sindelo, S., Atujuna, M., O’Rourke, S., Bekker, L., & Montgomery, E. (2021) · African Journal of AIDS Research · doi:10.2989/16085906.2021.1998784 · Cited by 6
Exploring the connection between dementia and eating, drinking and swallowing difficulty: Findings from home‐based semi‐structured interviews
O’Neill, M., Duffy, O. M., Henderson, M., Davis, A., & Kernohan, G. W. (2023) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12899 · Cited by 6
A 5-day codesign sprint to improve housing decisions of older adults: lessons learned from Sweden and the Netherlands
Nordin, S., Sturge, J. L., Meijering, L., & Elf, M. (2023) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2023.2247290 · Cited by 7
‘Very little is done other than the odd reminder’…‘look after yourself’: a mixed-methods evaluation of what Australian teachers need and want from a wellbeing program
Beames, J. R., Roberts, A., Deady, M., O’Dea, B., & Werner‐Seidler, A. (2024) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-023-00684-y · Cited by 9
Remote pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease: developing the model using experience-based codesign
Brighton, L. J., Spain, N., Gonzalez-Nieto, J., Ingram, K. A., Harvey, J., Man, W. D., & Nolan, C. M. (2024) · BMJ Open Respiratory Research · doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002061 · Cited by 6
Co-designing adult weight management services: a qualitative study exploring barriers, facilitators, and considerations for future commissioning
Langford, R. M., Brockman, R., Banks, J., Jago, R., Gillison, F., Coulman, K. D., Moore, T. H., & Nobles, J. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18031-w · Cited by 6
Developing oral health services for people experiencing severe and multiple disadvantage: a case study from Southwest England
Paisi, M., Withers, L., Anderson, R., Doughty, J., Griffiths, L., Jameson, B., Murphy, E., Musa, A., Nelder, A., Rogers, S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Oral Health · doi:10.3389/froh.2024.1283861 · Cited by 6
Embedding patient and public involvement into a doctoral study: developing a point-of-care HIV testing intervention for dental settings
Doughty, J., Preston, J., Paisi, M., Hudson, A., Burns, F. M., Porter, S. R., & Watt, R. G. (2024) · Frontiers in Oral Health · doi:10.3389/froh.2024.1359132 · Cited by 6
The co-design and acceptability of a genital body image educational video for people with a penis
Fernando, A. N., Dwyer, B., Randhawa, A., & Sharp, G. (2024) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101751 · Cited by 6
Implementation of a Co-Design Strategy to Develop a Dashboard to Support Shared Decision Making in Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease
Morken, V., Perry, L. M., Coughlin, A., O'Connor, M. L., Chmiel, R., Xinos, S., Peipert, J. D., Garcia, S. F., Linder, J. A., Ackermann, R. T., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13144178 · Cited by 6
From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study
Ayre, S. K., Johnston, E. A., Bourdaniotis, X. E., Zajdlewicz, L., Beesley, V. L., Pole, J. D., Hansen, A. R., Gasper, H. M., Cossio, D., Lock, G., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309361 · Cited by 6
Reflections on an Evidence Review Process to Inform the Co‐Design of a Toolkit for Supporting End‐of‐Life Care Planning With People With Intellectual Disabilities
Tilley, E., Rouse, L., Tuffrey‐Wijne, I., & Anderson, R. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70062 · Cited by 6
Healthy from the Start: Co‐Designing Sleep, Nutrition and Physical Activity Resources for Young Shiftworkers—Novel Implementation and Evaluation
Shriane, A. E., Ferguson, S. A., Rigney, G., Gupta, C. C., Kolbe-Alexander, T. L., Sprajcer, M. A., Hilditch, C. J., Stanton, R., Thomas, M. J. W., Paterson, J. L., et al. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70063 · Cited by 6
Optimising co-design processes in telemedicine innovation–developing a telemedical solution for emergency medical services
Klager, E., Lintschinger, J. M., Teufel, A., Schaden, E., Manschein, V., Reischmann, L., Ulbing, S., Willschke, H., Frimmel, C., Renner, R., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309955 · Cited by 7
Examining suicidality in relation to the menopause: A systematic review
Martin-Key, N. A., Funnell, E. L., Barker, E., & Bahn, S. (2024) · PLOS mental health. · doi:10.1371/journal.pmen.0000161 · Cited by 6
A mixed-methods study among adolescents and teachers in Bogotá, Colombia: adapting the OurFutures Alcohol Program
Egan, L., Ospina‐Pinillos, L., Champion, K. E., Newton, N. C., Alonso, P. V. B., Teesson, M., & Gardner, L. A. (2024) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daae152 · Cited by 6
Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
Deldot, M., Lau, E., Rayner, N., Spinks, J., Kelly, F., & Nissen, L. M. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70092 · Cited by 6
Co-creation and community engagement in implementation research with vulnerable populations: a co-creation process in China
Zhang, L., Li, K. T., Wang, T., Luo, D., Tan, R. K. J., Marley, G., Tang, W., Ramaswamy, R., Tucker, J. D., & Wu, D. (2024) · Sexual Health · doi:10.1071/sh23149 · Cited by 6
Using co-design to understand consumer’s health information-seeking behaviours and design preferences for a new digital clinical dashboard in aged care
Nguyen, A., Dodds, L., Ludlow, K., Baysari, M. T., Comi, R., Zheng, W. Y., & Westbrook, J. I. (2024) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-024-05581-2 · Cited by 6
Development of an online psychological intervention to prevent depression in patients with atrial fibrillation: lessons learned in a user-centered design study
Helmark, C., Ahm, R., Brandes, A., Skovbakke, S. J., Nielsen, J. C., Frostholm, L., Taylor, R. S., & Pedersen, S. S. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-024-01586-1 · Cited by 6
Using a co-design approach to develop a Preventative Online Mental Health Program for Youth (POMHPY): a quality improvement project
Moghimi, E., Belfry, K., Farr, S., Stafford, S., Bogdan, A., Brush, M., Canning, C., & Kim, S. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-12101-w · Cited by 6
Is It Time to SIMPLI-FAI? Development of the SIngle-Leg Squat Movement Performance scaLe for Individuals With FemoroAcetabular Impingement Syndrome Codesigned With End Users
Gomes, D. A., de Castro, M. P., da Costa, G. V., Ferreira, T., Silva, D. D. O., Kemp, J. L., Frasson, V. B., Canella, R. P., Ruschel, C., & Fontana, H. D. B. (2025) · JOSPT open. · doi:10.2519/josptopen.2025.0050 · Cited by 6
Co‐Designing a Digital Stroke Prevention Platform: Leveraging Lived Experience and Expert Advice
Purvis, T. L., Burns, C., Barker, S., Kilkenny, M. F., Gall, S., Farmer, C., Sudhakar, V., Cadilhac, D. A.-M., Booth, B. E., Bray, J., et al. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70293 · Cited by 7
Asking for directions: Police perspectives on the responsible conduct of participatory research
del Pozo, B., Magee, L. A., Whiteside, A., Thompson, E., & Martins, K. F. (2024) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161251349607 · Cited by 6
“Il faut continuer à poser des questions” patient reported outcome measures in cystic fibrosis: An anthropological perspective
Coucke, R., Chansard, A., Bontemps, V., Grenet, D., Hubert, D., Martin, C., Lammertyn, E. J., Bardin, E., Bulteel, V., Chedevergne, F., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cystic Fibrosis · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2021.02.009 · Cited by 6
From policy to practice: prioritizing person-centred healthcare actions in the state of Victoria
Bragge, P., Horvat, L., McKinlay, L., Borg, K., MacLeod-Smith, B. J., & Wright, B. (2021) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-021-00782-2 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Developing health literacy events: a case study of teachers designing health curricula
Rumenapp, J. C., Troiano, B., Adams, M., Moya, J., Lawrence, E. K., & Razfar, A. (2023) · Health Education Journal · doi:10.1177/00178969231180371 · Cited by 6
Development of pediatric acute care education (PACE): An adaptive electronic learning (e-learning) environment for healthcare providers in Tanzania
Meaney, P. A., Hokororo, A., Masenge, T. J., Mwanga, J. R., Kalabamu, F. S., Berg, M., Rozenfeld, B., Smith, Z. H., Chami, N., Mkopi, N. P., et al. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231180471 · Cited by 6
Reflections on the co‐design process of a holistic assessment tool for a Kaupapa Māori antenatal wānanga (workshop)
Barrett, N., Burrows, L., Carr, P. A., & Smith, L. T. (2023) · Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online · doi:10.1080/1177083x.2023.2236685 · Cited by 6
An Individualized Postoperative Pain Risk Communication Tool for Use in Pediatric Surgery: Co-Design and Usability Evaluation
Wood, M. D., West, N., Fokkens, C., Chen, Y., Loftsgard, K. C., Cardinal, K., Whyte, S. D., Portales-Casamar, É., & Görges, M. (2023) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/46785 · Cited by 6
Co-designing a culturally-sensitive theory-driven advance care planning game with Chinese older adults and healthcare providers
Liu, L., Wang, Y., Ho, T. C.-K., Li, M. M.-Y., Cheung, E. W.-S., Chow, R. S.-K., Gu, C., & Chan, H. Y. L. (2024) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163231222776 · Cited by 6
Practice Recommendations or Not? The LoGeT Model as Empirical Approach to Generate Localized, Generalized, and Transferable Evidence
Lachner, A., Sibley, L., & Wagner, S. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09876-z · Cited by 6
Co-design workshops to develop evidence synthesis summary formats for use by clinical guideline development groups
Murray, R., Magendran, E., Chander, N., Lynch, R., O’Neill, M., Devane, D., Smith, S. M., Mahtani, K. R., Ryan, M., Clyne, B., et al. (2024) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02518-z · Cited by 6
Practical Strategies for Co-design: The Case of Engaging Patients in Developing Patient-Facing Shared-Decision Making Materials for Lung Cancer Screening
Fix, G. M., Kaitz, J. E., Herbst, A. N., Wiener, R. S., Crocker, D., Miano, D., & Barker, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Patient Experience · doi:10.1177/23743735241252247 · Cited by 6
Developing films to support vaccine-hesitant, ethnically diverse parents’ decision-making about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: a codesign study
Fisher, H., Denford, S., Chantler, T., Audrey, S., Finn, A. H. R., Hajinur, H., Hickman, M., Mounier‐Jack, S., Roderick, M. R., Tucker, L., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079539 · Cited by 6
Participatory design and needs assessment for a pressure-sensitive pen and mobile application (SensoGrip) for children with handwriting problems
Rettinger, L., Klupper, C., Hauser, C., Schönthaler, E., Kerschbaumer, A., Werner, K., & Werner, F. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2022.2138994 · Cited by 6
Stories for Change: The impact of Public Narrative on the co‐production process
Moniz, S., Karia, A., Khalid, A. F., & Vindrola‐Padros, C. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13718 · Cited by 6
A rapid review for developing a co-design framework for a pediatric surgical communication application
Cwintal, M., Ranjbar, H., Bandamiri, P., Guadagno, E., Osmanlliu, E., & Poenaru, D. (2023) · Journal of Pediatric Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.01.030 · Cited by 6
Using Human‐Centred Design to Codesign Patient Engagement Tools With a Patient Advisory Council: Successes and Challenges
Knaub, M., Leon, S., Pokharel, S., Kiryanova, V., Giroux, K., Khanna, P., Rychtera, A., Duquette, D., Mathura, P. V., Verdin, N., et al. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70230 · Cited by 5
Rehabilite Game+: Pose estimation-based serious games for forearm and hand movement rehabilitation
Fontenele, J. E., Teixeira, S. S., Sousa, D. L., Moreira, R., Silva, M., Nascimento, S., Pereira, L., & Teles, A. S. (2025) · Entertainment Computing · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2025.100992 · Cited by 5
Navigating in a value-driven practice: a study of a Dutch Recovery College as a learning, social, and organizational space
van Wezel, M. M. C., Muusse, C., Boumans, J., Scheerstra, F. J. A., Broos, A., Lize, J., Leunen, K., Kole, M. P. M., Verspoor, A., van de Mheen, D., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1625779 · Cited by 5
Co‐Producing Personalised Discharge Planning: Developing a Toolkit to Improve Caregiver Involvement in Hospital Transitions
McEwan, K., Sanders, T., Carr, S. M., van der Graaf, P., Jones, S. E., Aquino, M. R. J., Hogg, M. J., Hameed, R., Lai, F. H., Cooper, C., et al. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70483 · Cited by 5
Human-centred design thinking: a novel tool for co-creation in physical activity research
Rivera, E., Romero, V., & Maddison, R. (2025) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-025-01409-6 · Cited by 5
Developing and applying the ‘Participatory Research to Action Framework’ for meaningful engagement of experts-by-experience in applied health services research: a case study approach
Giosa, J., Evans, C., Cardozo, V., & Holyoke, P. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00824-x · Cited by 5
Beyond a buzzword: the need for shared language, education, and enhanced reporting of disability inclusive co-design research
Chapman, K., Yi, J., Norwood, M. F., Clanchy, K., Carlini, J., Shirota, C., Mann, M. C., Mitchell, J., & Kendall, E. A. (2026) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00831-y · Cited by 5
Strengths, limitations, and way forward of home-based rehabilitation practices after stroke: a scoping review
Oppici, L., Hestetun-Mandrup, A. M., Pacheco, M. M., Simonsen, E. H., Opheim, A. I., Rafsten, L., Løvstad, M., Berzina, G., Sunnerhagen, K. S., & Rudd, J. R. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14139-4 · Cited by 5
Long-Term Impact of a Smartphone App on Prescriber Adherence to Antibiotic Guidelines for Adult Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Interrupted Time-Series Study
Yoon, C. H., Nolan, I., Humphrey, G., Duffy, E. J., Thomas, M., & Ritchie, S. R. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42978 · Cited by 5
Codesigning a user-centred digital psychoeducational tool for youth mental well-being with families in Canada: study protocol for a sequential exploratory mixed methods study
Moss, S. J., Racine, N. M., Ahmed, S. B., Birnie, K. A., Cherak, M. S., Curran, J., Halperin, B. A., Halperin, S. A., Harley, M., Hu, J., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072533 · Cited by 5
Co-designing Person-Centered eHealth Information Services: The Case of Maternal Health Care in Kenya
Nyatuka, D. R., & de la Harpe, R. (2023) · Springer series in design and innovation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29306-1_16 · Cited by 5
Co-designing talent transfer pathways in para-sport: a case study
Green, A., Kean, B., Fleischman, D., & Mulcahy, R. F. (2024) · Managing Sport and Leisure · doi:10.1080/23750472.2024.2354196 · Cited by 5
Co-design for technology in paediatric therapy: Developing an augmented reality intervention for children with developmental coordination disorder
Welsby, E., Hobbs, D., Hordacre, B. G., Ward, E., & Hillier, S. (2024) · Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering · doi:10.1177/20556683241266780 · Cited by 5
Co-design with Indigenous Peoples
Anderson, K. M., Butler, T., Gall, A., Elder‐Robinson, E., & Garvey, G. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56806-0_64 · Cited by 5
Co-designing a Vaping Cessation Program for Australian Young Adults: A Conceptual Model
Rahman, N., Sebar, B., & Sofija, E. (2024) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntae222 · Cited by 5
Credit where it’s due: Recognising lived experience in research authorship
Lynch, E. A., Earle-Bandaralage, L., Eley, S., Gancia, A., Larcombe, S., Muthuralingam, S., Townsin, L., Wardill, H. R., & Corsini, N. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108472 · Cited by 5
Designing orthopaedic seat cushion made of rattan using quality function deployment approach
Gozali, L., Milano, A., Widodo, L., Ismail, S. B., Chofreh, A. G., Herwindiati, D. E., Gunadi, A., Goni, F. A., Susanto, S., & Cheng, W. H. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma · doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102771 · Cited by 5
Development of a User‐Centred Chronic Care Model for Patients With Heart Failure in a Limited‐Resource Setting: A Codesign Study
Koontalay, A., Botti, M., & Hutchinson, A. F. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70142 · Cited by 5
Evaluation and adaptation of a two-way text messaging intervention in the WIC breastfeeding peer counseling program: A qualitative analysis
Martinez‐Brockman, J. L., Granner, J. R., Buchanan, B., Acosta, L., Lonczak, M., Goeschel, L., Xu, X. J., Curry, L. A., Nuñez-Smith, M., & Pérez‐Escamilla, R. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313779 · Cited by 5
Co-creation in digital health services for older people: a realist review of enabling factors and barriers
Høiseth, M., & Nakrem, S. (2024) · Design for Health · doi:10.1080/24735132.2024.2449288 · Cited by 5
An ecosystem approach to the evaluation and impact analysis of heterogeneous preventive and/or early interventions projects for veterans and first responders in seven countries
Lukersmith, S., Salvador‐Carulla, L., Woods, C., Niyonsenga, T., Gutiérrez-Colosía, M. R., Mohanty, I., GARCÍA-ALONSO, C. R., Díaz-Milanés, D., Salinas-Perez, J. A., Davey, R., et al. (2025) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2025.152578 · Cited by 5
Focus groups on digital cognitive assessment in the context of Alzheimer's disease
van der Landen, S. M., van den Berg, R. L., Keijzer, M. J., van Liere, M. N., de Boer, C., Visser, L. N. C., van der Flier, W. M., Rhodius‐Meester, H. F. M., & Sikkes, S. A. M. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251318903 · Cited by 5
Co-design and clinician evaluation of resources to address weight stigma in antenatal care
Hill, B., Hailu, H., Jenkinson, B., Rakic, S., Nagpal, T. S., Boyle, J. A., Sheehan, P. M., Darlison, S., & Skouteris, H. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07327-3 · Cited by 5
Using segmentation to co-design a healthy eating program
Kitunen, A., Carins, J., Isbanner, S., & Rundle-Thiele, S. R. (2025) · Health Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07359683.2025.2478350 · Cited by 5
Applying co-design health literacy development in Australian prisons: protocol for system-wide application of the Optimising Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia) process
Gill, S. W., Bowman, J., Cheng, C. C., Shaw, C., Hampton, S. E., Hoey, W., & Osborne, R. H. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092128 · Cited by 5
Co-designed resources to improve sleep health in young shiftworkers: a qualitative study
Shriane, A. E., Vincent, G. E., Ferguson, S. A., Gupta, C. C., Kolbe-Alexander, T. L., Sprajcer, M., Hilditch, C. J., Stanton, R., Thomas, M. J. W., Paterson, J. L., et al. (2025) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106511 · Cited by 5
Co-Designing a postpartum diabetes prevention program after gestational diabetes mellitus: A MoSCoW prioritization workshop exercise
Racey, M., Alliston, P., Sherifali, D., Sriskandarajah, A., Sushko, K., & Lipscombe, L. L. (2025) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112269 · Cited by 5
A mobile app intervention to support nutrition education for heart failure management: co-design, development and user-testing
Sivakumar, B., Ricupero, M., Mahajan, A., Jefferson, K., Wenger, J., Code, J., Theodorou, A., & Arcand, J. (2025) · BMC Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s40795-025-01117-y · Cited by 5
Machine Learning Explanations as Boundary Objects: How AI Researchers Explain and Non-Experts Perceive Machine Learning
Ayobi, A., Stawarz, K., Katz, D., Marshall, P., Yamagata, T., Santos‐Rodríguez, R., Flach, P. A., & O’Kane, A. A. (2021) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 5
What Do Health Professionals and Parents Want as Part of an Online Childhood Obesity Prevention Program?
Walker, J. L., Dix, C. F., Hardt, J., Farletti, R., & Littlewood, R. (2022) · Childhood Obesity · doi:10.1089/chi.2021.0313 · Cited by 5
COVID‐19 in Western Australia: ‘The last straw’ and hopes for a ‘new normal’ for parents of children with long‐term conditions
Smith, S., Tallon, M. M., Smith, J. A., Jones, L., & Mörelius, E. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13792 · Cited by 5
The STAIR OF KNOWLEDGE—a codesigned intervention to prevent pressure ulcers, malnutrition, poor oral health and falls among older persons in nursing homes in Sweden: development of a complex intervention
Neziraj, M., Axelsson, M., Kumlien, C., Hellman, P., & Andersson, M. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072453 · Cited by 5
Co-design for interdisciplinary research communities
White, P. J., Deevy, C., Casey, B., Patocs, A., & Raina, P. (2023) · International Association of Societies of Design Research Congress (IASDR) · doi:10.21606/iasdr.2023.226 · Cited by 5
What are effective vaccine distribution approaches for equity-deserving and high-risk populations during COVID-19? Exploring best practices and recommendations in Canada: protocol for a mixed-methods multiple case codesign study
Aggarwal, M., Katz, A., Kokorelias, K. M., Wong, S. T., Aghajafari, F., Ivers, N. M., Martin‐Misener, R., Aubrey‐Bassler, K., Breton, M., Upshur, R. E. G., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072238 · Cited by 5
Exploring rural Nurses' preparedness and post‐resuscitation experiences. An ethnographic study
Riley, K., Middleton, R., Molloy, L., & Wilson, V. (2024) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.16295 · Cited by 5
Co-designing an intervention to improve the childhood catch-up vaccination process for migrant parents in Australia
Chau, M., Kaufman, J., Holland, P., Danchin, M. H., & Tuckerman, J. (2024) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.07.005 · Cited by 5
Co-Design to Evaluate the Impact of Gender Equality Initiatives: Lessons for Practitioners, Evaluators and Researchers
Taylor, H. L., & Williamson, S. (2024) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6779 · Cited by 5
Optimising Surveillance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Patient-Defined Obstacles and Solutions
Qurashi, M., von Wagner, C., & Sharma, R. (2024) · Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma · doi:10.2147/jhc.s462303 · Cited by 5
Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary evaluation of a user co-facilitated psychoeducational programme: a feasibility proof-of-concept randomised control trial
Skliarova, T., Lara‐Cabrera, M. L., Hafstad, H., Havnen, A., Sæther, S. G., Salvesen, Ø. O., Vaag, J. R., & Torgersen, T. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-06015-4 · Cited by 5
From Hospital to Home: Applying a Co‐Design Approach to Determine the Key Components of an Intervention to Support Transition‐To‐Home After Stroke
O’Callaghan, G., Fahy, M. P., Hall, P., McCartan, D., Langhorne, P., Galvin, R., & Horgan, F. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70040 · Cited by 5
Co-designing the INHSU Prisons Hepatitis C Advocacy Toolkit using the Advocacy Strategy Framework
Walker, S., Dawson, O., Sheehan, Y., Shrestha, L. B., Lloyd, A. R., Sheehan, J., Maduka, N., Cabezas, J., Kronfli, N., & Akiyama, M. J. (2024) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104628 · Cited by 5
Contemporary media campaigns for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis with social marketing benchmarking
BRAITHWAITE, F., Deshpande, S., Buchbinder, R., Dennett, L., Jean, C. R. S., Krebs, B., & Gross, D. P. (2024) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104739 · Cited by 5
How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review
Alpeza, F., Avermark, H., Gobbo, E., & van Wees, S. H. (2024) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2024.2431380 · Cited by 5

Authors: Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., & Bragge, P.
Affiliations: Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author: Slattery, Peter
ORCID: Slattery, Peter
Saeri, Alexander K.
Bragge, Peter
Venue: Health Research Policy and Systems
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2020-02-11
Volume: 18
Issue: 1
Pages: 17-17
ISSN: 1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9
PMC: PMC7014755
OpenAlex: W3008652539
Cited by: 1,313
References: 54
Citations by year: 2026: 259 · 2025: 311 · 2024: 315 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 10
FWCI: 20.43
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (tdm)
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Locations: Health Research Policy and Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders: Transport Accident Commission
Topics: Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
Keywords: research co-design, end-user involvement, patient and public involvement, research waste, learning planning, research engagement
MeSH terms: Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Research Design, Biomedical Research, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Figures

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks