The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Billions of dollars are lost annually in health research that fails to create meaningful benefits for patients. Engaging in research co-design – the meaningful involvement of end-users in research – may help address this research waste. This rapid overview of reviews addressed three related questions, namely (1) what approaches to research co-design exist in health settings? (2) What activities do these research co-design approaches involve? (3) What do we know about the effectiveness of existing research co-design approaches? The review focused on the study planning phase of research, defined as the point up to which the research question and study design are finalised. Methods: Reviews of research co-design were systematically identified using a rapid overview of reviews approach (PROSPERO: CRD42019123034). The search strategy encompassed three academic databases, three grey literature databases, and a hand-search of the journal Research Involvement and Engagement . Two reviewers independently conducted the screening and data extraction and resolved disagreements through discussion. Disputes were resolved through discussion with a senior author (PB). One reviewer performed quality assessment. The results were narratively synthesised. Results: A total of 26 records (reporting on 23 reviews) met the inclusion criteria. Reviews varied widely in their application of ‘research co-design’ and their application contexts, scope and theoretical foci. The research co-design approaches identified involved interactions with end-users outside of study planning, such as recruitment and dissemination. Activities involved in research co-design included focus groups, interviews and surveys. The effectiveness of research co-design has rarely been evaluated empirically or experimentally; however, qualitative exploration has described the positive and negative outcomes associated with co-design. The research provided many recommendations for conducting research co-design, including training participating end-users in research skills, having regular communication between researchers and end-users, setting clear end-user expectations, and assigning set roles to all parties involved in co-design. Conclusions: Research co-design appears to be widely used but seldom described or evaluated in detail. Though it has rarely been tested empirically or experimentally, existing research suggests that it can benefit researchers, practitioners, research processes and research outcomes. Realising the potential of research co-design may require the development of clearer and more consistent terminology, better reporting of the activities involved and better evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite the rise in popularity and continued growth of youth engagement in health research, systematic and deliberate theory‐building has been limited.”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Given the near‐unanimous recognition that the biggest gap in this area of research is the lack of evidence on impact gained through rigorous evaluation, 43 , 57 , 58 , 61 , 90 the small number of impact‐focused models and frameworks is noteworthy.”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with review findings of empirical studies in PPI whereby short‐term, individual‐level outcomes were more represented in the literature. 43 , 91 , 92”
From A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · cited 1×
“For example, the Fogg Behaviour Model [53] or the COM-B Behaviour Change model [54] could be used to diagnose actors’ capabilities, motivation, and triggers or opportunities.”
MethodDevelopment of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 · Cited by 4,374
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 · Cited by 3,469
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. G. (2014) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 · Cited by 2,700
A behavior model for persuasive design
Fogg, B. (2009) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology · doi:10.1145/1541948.1541999 · Cited by 2,328
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60329-9 · Cited by 2,208
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3453 · Cited by 1,983
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Oliver S, Gray J. A bibliography of research reports about patients’, clinicians’ and researchers’ priorities for new research. London: James Lind Alliance; 2006.
- Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research World Health Organization; 2017.
- Veritas health innovation covidence systematic review software. Melbourne.https://www.covidence.org/home. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.
- INVOLVE. Guidance on co-producing a research project. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2018.
- INVOLVE. Co-production in action: number one. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2019.
- Algate F, Gallagher R, Nguyen S, Ruda S, Sanders M (2014) EAST: four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. https://www.bi.team/publications/east-four-simple-ways-to-apply-behavioural-insights/. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vargas, C., Whelan, J., Brimblecombe, J. K., & Allender, S. E. (2022) · Public Health Research & Practice · doi:10.17061/phrp3222211 · Cited by 856
Grindell, C., Coates, E., Croot, L., & O’Cathain, A. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y · Cited by 409
Co-production: A resource to guide co-producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences
Smith, B. M., Williams, O., Bone, L., & Collective, T. M. S. W. C.-P. (2022) · Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2022.2052946 · Cited by 312
Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations
Moll, S. E., Wyndham‐West, M., Mulvale, G. M., Park, S., Buettgen, A., Phoenix, M. P., Fleisig, R. V., & Bruce, E. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038339 · Cited by 284
Designing and undertaking randomised implementation trials: guide for researchers
Wolfenden, L., Foy, R., Presseau, J., Grimshaw, J., Ivers, N. M., Powell, B. J., Taljaard, M., Wiggers, J., Sutherland, R., Nathan, N., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m3721 · Cited by 287
Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration
Witteman, H. O., Maki, K. G., Vaisson, G., Finderup, J., Lewis, K. B., Steffensen, K. D., Beaudoin, C., Comeau, S., & Volk, R. J. (2021) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x211014163 · Cited by 196
Hunter, B. J., Thomas, G., Wilhelmová, R., Trendafilova, P., Blaževičienė, A., Lynch, L., & Jokinen, M. (2022) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103376 · Cited by 164
van Kessel, R., Hrzic, R., O’Nuallain, E., Weir, E. M., Wong, B. L. H., Anderson, M., Baron‐Cohen, S., & Mossialos, E. A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/33819 · Cited by 169
Smith, H. J. J., Budworth, L., Grindey, C., Hague, I., Hamer, N., Kislov, R., van der Graaf, P., & Langley, J. (2022) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-022-00838-x · Cited by 143
Recommendations to advance digital health equity: A systematic review of qualitative studies
Wilson, S., Tolley, C., Mc Ardle, R., Lawson, L., Beswick, E., Hassan, N., Slight, R., & Slight, S. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01177-7 · Cited by 139
Peters, S., Guccione, L., Francis, J., Best, S., Tavender, E. J., Curran, J., Davies, K., Rowe, S., Palmer, V. J., & Klaic, M. (2024) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-024-01394-4 · Cited by 135
A Comprehensive Review of Optimal Approaches to Co-Design in Health with First Nations Australians
Butler, T., Gall, A., Garvey, G., Ngampromwongse, K., Hector, D., Turnbull, S., Lucas, K., Nehill, C., Boltong, A. G., Keefe, D. M. K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192316166 · Cited by 122
Rouncefield‐Swales, A., Harris, J., Carter, B., Bray, L., Bewley, T., & Martin, R. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252774 · Cited by 115
Messiha, K., Chinapaw, M. J. M., Ket, J. C. F., An, Q., Anand-Kumar, V., Longworth, G. R., CHASTIN, S. F. M., & Altenburg, T. M. (2023) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdad046 · Cited by 122
Singh, D. R., Sah, R. K., Simkhada, B., & Darwin, Z. J. (2023) · Global Health Research and Policy · doi:10.1186/s41256-023-00290-6 · Cited by 125
Amann, J., & Sleigh, J. (2021) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2021.1912089 · Cited by 110
Mitigating unintended consequences of co‐design in health care
Shé, É. N., & Harrison, R. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13308 · Cited by 117
Hamilton, C. B., Hoens, A. M., McKinnon, A., McQuitty, S., English, K., Hawke, L. D., & LI, L. C. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13227 · Cited by 105
A New Normal: Integrating Lived Experience Into Scientific Data Syntheses
Beames, J. R., Kikas, K., O'Gradey-Lee, M., Gale, N., Werner-Seidler, A., Boydell, K. M., & Hudson, J. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.763005 · Cited by 99
An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described
Kilfoy, A., Hsu, T. C., Stockton-Powdrell, C., Whelan, P., Chu, C. H., & Jibb, L. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01385-1 · Cited by 123
Direct observation methods: A practical guide for health researchers
Fix, G. M., Kim, B., Ruben, M. A., & McCullough, M. B. (2022) · PEC Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100036 · Cited by 123
Longworth, G. R., Erikowa-Orighoye, O., Anieto, E. M., Agnello, D. M., Zapata-Restrepo, J. R., Masquillier, C., & Giné‐Garriga, M. (2024) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-024-01014-2 · Cited by 93
Agnello, D. M., Anand-Kumar, V., An, Q., de Boer, J., Delfmann, L. R., Longworth, G. R., Loisel, Q. E. A., McCaffrey, L., Steiner, A., & CHASTIN, S. F. M. (2025) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-025-02514-4 · Cited by 90
Optimising co-design with ethnic minority consumers
Chauhan, A., Leefe, J., Shé, É. N., & Harrison, R. (2021) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-021-01579-z · Cited by 83
A review of research with co-design methods in health education
Iniesto, F., Charitonos, K., & Littlejohn, A. H. (2022) · Open Education Studies · doi:10.1515/edu-2022-0017 · Cited by 82
Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review
Tofts, L. J., Simmonds, J., Schwartz, S. B., Richheimer, R. M., O’Connor, C., Elias, E., Engelbert, R., Cleary, K., Tinkle, B. T., Kline, A. D., et al. (2023) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-023-02717-2 · Cited by 74
“Using a codesign methodology [9], a series of meetings were established to define, design, and refine the framework.”
MethodA research approach for co‐designing education with healthcare consumers
Brand, G., Sheers, C., Wise, S., Seubert, L., Clifford, R. M., Griffiths, P., & Etherton‐Beer, C. (2020) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14411 · Cited by 71
Fox, S., BROWN, L. J. E., Antrobus, S., Brough, D., Drake, R., Jury, F., Leroi, I., Parry‐Jones, A., & Machin, M. (2021) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/24483 · Cited by 80
Integrating Theory in Co-design: An Abductive Approach
Hurley, E., Dietrich, T., & Rundle-Thiele, S. R. (2021) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1177/1839334921998541 · Cited by 69
Interventions that influence animal-product consumption: A meta-review
Grundy, E. A. C., Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., Watkins, K., Houlden, T., Farr, N., Askin, H., Lee, J., Mintoft-Jones, A., Cyna, S., et al. (2021) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100111 · Cited by 74
Self-citationVargas, C., Zorbas, C., Longworth, G. R., Ugalde, A., Needham, C., Sunil, A., Hargous, C. V., Bennett, R., Forrester‐Bowling, T., Richter, A. P. C., et al. (2025) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdaf084 · Cited by 76
Perry, M., Cotes, L., Horton, B. P., Kunac, R., Snell, I., Taylor, B., Wright, A., & Devan, H. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020552 · Cited by 66
McGill, B., Corbett, L., Grunseit, A. C., Irving, M. J., & O'Hara, B. J. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10040647 · Cited by 71
Smith, S., Tallon, M. M., Clark, C., Jones, L., & Mörelius, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2022.902655 · Cited by 59
Russell, D. H., Trew, S., Harris, L. G., Dickson, J., Walsh, K., Higgins, D. J., & Smith, R. (2024) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241235895 · Cited by 59
King, P. T., Cormack, D. M., Edwards, R., Harris, R. B., & Paine, S. (2022) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101077 · Cited by 65
Constantin, N., Edward, H., Ng, H., Radisic, A., Yule, A., D’Asti, A., D’Amore, C., Reid, J. C., & Beauchamp, M. (2022) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03345-4 · Cited by 58
Morley, C., Jose, K., Hall, S. E., Shaw, K. A.-M., McGowan, D., Wyss, M., & Winzenberg, T. M. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084620 · Cited by 58
Sheikhan, N. Y., Kuluski, K., Mckee, S., Hiebert, M., & Hawke, L. D. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13779 · Cited by 57
Perspectives in poverty and mental health
Marbin, D., Gutwinski, S., Schreiter, S., & Heinz, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.975482 · Cited by 69
Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review
Tay, B. S. J., Cox, D. N., Brinkworth, G. D., Davis, A., Edney, S. M., Gwilt, I., & Ryan, J. C. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13103593 · Cited by 56
Nguyen, N. T., Collins, A., & Collins, C. M. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103642 · Cited by 60
Fitzpatrick, S. J., Lamb, H., Stewart, E., Gulliver, A., Morse, A. R., Giugni, M., & Banfield, M. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13785 · Cited by 53
Yadav, U. N., Lloyd, J. E., Baral, K. P., Bhatta, N., Mehta, S., & Harris, M. (2021) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00664-z · Cited by 52
Darley, A., & Carroll, Á. M. (2022) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.6546 · Cited by 52
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2022) · European Journal of General Practice · doi:10.1080/13814788.2021.2010700 · Cited by 50
Diniz, E. J. D. S., Fontenele, J. E., de Oliveira, A. C., Bastos, V. H., Teixeira, S. S., Rabêlo, R. A. L., Calçada, D. B., Santos, R. M., de Oliveira, A. K. S., & Teles, A. S. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10040698 · Cited by 52
Glanville, C. R., Abraham, C., & Coleman, G. J. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122333 · Cited by 50
Chinsen, A., Berg, A., Nielsen, S., Trewella, K., Cronin, T. J., Pace, C. C., Pang, K. C., & Tollit, M. A. (2025) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(25)00063-x · Cited by 57
Critical measurement issues in the assessment of social media influence on body image
Jarman, H. K., McLean, S. A., Griffiths, S., Teague, S. J., Rodgers, R. F., Paxton, S. J., Austen, E., Harris, E., Steward, T., Shatte, A., et al. (2022) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.12.007 · Cited by 46
Hanney, S. R., Kanya, L., Pokhrel, S., Jones, T. H., & Boaz, A. (2020) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00581-1 · Cited by 46
Strategies for enacting health policy codesign: a scoping review and direction for research
Walker, S. C., Baquero, B. I., Bekemeier, B., Parnes, M. F., & Arora, K. (2023) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-023-01295-y · Cited by 48
Perry, N., Sun, C., Munro, M., Boulton, K., & Guastella, A. J. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01355-7 · Cited by 51
Talevski, J., Kulnik, S. T., Jessup, R. L., Falls, R., Cvetanovska, N., & Beauchamp, A. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13633 · Cited by 44
Finch, J., Waters, A. M., & Farrell, L. J. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.169 · Cited by 49
Cross, J., Bohne, C. A., Ngwala, S., Shabani, J., Wainaina, J., Dosunmu, O., Kassim, I., Penzias, R. E., Tillya, R., Gathara, D., et al. (2023) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-023-04341-2 · Cited by 44
Reynolds, A. C., Sweetman, A., Crowther, M. E., Paterson, J. L., Scott, H., Lechat, B., Wanstall, S. E., Brown, B. W., Lovato, N., Adams, R. J., et al. (2023) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101716 · Cited by 43
Canfell, O. J., Davidson, K., Woods, L. S., Sullivan, C. M., Cocoros, N. M., Klompas, M., Zambarano, B., Eakin, E., Littlewood, R., & Burton‐Jones, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.854525 · Cited by 43
Ludlow, K., Russell, J. K., Ryan, B., Brown, R. L., Joynt, T., Uhlmann, L. R., Smith, G. E., Donovan, C., Hides, L., Spence, S. H., et al. (2023) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076231216410 · Cited by 42
Bray, E. A., Everett, B., George, A., Salamonson, Y., & Ramjan, L. M. (2021) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.1979667 · Cited by 41
Development of a Smart Home Interface With Older Adults: Multi-Method Co-Design Study
Ghorayeb, A., Comber, R., & Gooberman‐Hill, R. (2023) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/44439 · Cited by 41
Ayobi, A., Stawarz, K., Katz, D., Marshall, P., Yamagata, T., Santos‐Rodríguez, R., Flach, P. A., & O’Kane, A. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479601 · Cited by 40
Strategies for engaging patients in co-design of an intervention
Zogas, A., Sitter, K. E., Barker, A. M., Fix, G. M., Khanna, A., Herbst, A. N., & Vimalananda, V. G. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108191 · Cited by 40
Lauer-Schmaltz, M. W., Cash, P. J., Hansen, J. P., & Das, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3508029 · Cited by 41
Lammons, W., Buffardi, A. L., & Marks, D. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00748-6 · Cited by 40
Deconstructing design thinking as a tool for the implementation of a population health initiative
Jarrett, C., Baxter, Y. C., Boch, J., Carrasco, C., Muñoz, D. C., Dib, K. M., Pessoa, L., Saric, J., Silveira, M., & Steinmann, P. (2022) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-022-00892-5 · Cited by 41
Yadav, U. N., Lloyd, J. E., Baral, K. P., Bhatta, N., Mehata, S., & Harris, M. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045175 · Cited by 39
Miller, T., & Reihlen, M. R. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107652 · Cited by 41
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review
Windle, A., Marshall, A., de la Perrelle, L., Champion, S., Ross, P. D. S., Harvey, G., & Davy, C. P. (2023) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000407 · Cited by 42
Wang, G., Chang, F., Gu, Z., Kasraian, D., & van Wesemael, P. J. V. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18195-5 · Cited by 39
Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design
Dietrich, T., Guldager, J. D., Lyk, P., Vallentin-Holbech, L., Rundle-Thiele, S. R., Majgaard, G., & Stock, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.634102 · Cited by 39
Mathias, K. R., Bunkley, N., Pillai, P., Ae-Ngibise, K. A., Kpobi, L. N. A., Taylor, D., Joag, K., Rawat, M., Hammoudeh, W., Mitwalli, S., et al. (2024) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002575 · Cited by 38
Brinsley, J., O'Connor, E. J., Singh, B., McKeon, G., Curtis, R., Ferguson, T., Gosse, G., Willems, I., Marent, P.-J., Szeto, K., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/56975 · Cited by 42
Munce, S., Gray, C. S., Pomeroy, B. C., Bayley, M. T., Kokorelias, K. M., Luong, D., Biddiss, E. A., Cave, T., Bragge, P., Chew-Graham, C. A., et al. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/50463 · Cited by 41
Self-citationCo-designing care for multimorbidity: a systematic review
Sumner, J., Ng, C. W. T., Teo, K., Peh, A. L. T., & Lim, Y. W. (2024) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03263-9 · Cited by 37
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Lawless, M., Thompson, M. O., Shultz, T., Chehade, M. J., Whiteway, L., Sheppard, A., de Plaza, M. A. P., & Kitson, A. A. (2021) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069211019623 · Cited by 37
Co-design of a digital dietary intervention for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes
Tay, B. S. J., Edney, S. M., Brinkworth, G. D., Cox, D. N., Wiggins, B., Davis, A., Gwilt, I., Haveman‐Nies, A., & Ryan, J. C. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12102-y · Cited by 40
Brien, R., Volpe, I., Grigg, J., Lyons, T., Hughes, C., McKinnon, G., Tzanetis, S., Crawford, S., Eade, A., Lee, N., et al. (2023) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-023-00761-6 · Cited by 36
Gillam, J., Davies, N., Aworinde, J., Yorganci, E., Anderson, J. E., & Evans, C. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/29837 · Cited by 36
Bartels, H. C., Horsch, A., Cooney, N., Brennan, D. J., & Lalor, J. (2022) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04726-8 · Cited by 36
Digital behaviour change interventions to increase vegetable intake in adults: a systematic review
Livingstone, K. M., Rawstorn, J. C., Partridge, S. R., Godrich, S. L., McNaughton, S. A., Hendrie, G. A., Blekkenhorst, L. C., Maddison, R., Zhang, Y., Barnett, S., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-023-01439-9 · Cited by 36
de Plaza, M. A. P., Yadav, L., & Kitson, A. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2023.1154614 · Cited by 40
A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research
Sanchez, S., Thorburn, R., Rea, M., Kaufman, P., Schwartz, R., Selby, P., & Chaiton, M. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13975 · Cited by 35
“67 With respect to the concept of engagement, the terminology used in the literature is vast and diverse 43 ; thus, we followed the SPOR definition of patient engagement in research as the meaningful and active collaboration between patients and researchers in research governance, decision ‐ making…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCo‐designing nutrition interventions with consumers: A scoping review
Meloncelli, N. J. L., Young, A., Christoffersen, A., Rushton, A., Zhelnov, P., Wilkinson, S. A., Scott, A. M., & de Jersey, S. (2022) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.13082 · Cited by 35
Pitt, C., Norris, K., & Pecl, G. T. (2024) · Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education · doi:10.1007/s42322-023-00156-y · Cited by 35
Asher, R. C., Jakstas, T., Wolfson, J. A., Rose, A. J., Bucher, T., Lavelle, F., Dean, M., Duncanson, K., Innes, B., Burrows, T. L., et al. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12072011 · Cited by 36
White, B. K., Martin, A., & White, J. A. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific · doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100528 · Cited by 34
Lawless, M., Tieu, M., Chan, R. J., Hendriks, J., & Kitson, A. A. (2023) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648231161929 · Cited by 35
Optimizing adherence to allopurinol for gout: patients' perspectives
Spragg, J. C. J., Michael, T. J. F., Aslani, P., Coleshill, M. J., Chan, J. S., Day, R. O., & STOCKER, S. L. (2023) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.15657 · Cited by 33
Mandoh, M., Raeside, R., Todd, A., Redfern, J., Mihrshahi, S., Cheng, H. L., Phongsavan, P., & Partridge, S. R. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17283-2 · Cited by 32
Javanparast, S., Robinson, S., Kitson, A. A., & Arciuli, J. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4 · Cited by 31
Russ, E., Petrakis, M., Whitaker, L., Fitzroy, R., & Short, M. (2024) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941241234272 · Cited by 31
Gerrard, J. M., Godwin, S. J., Whiteley, K., Charles, J., Sadler, S. G., & Chuter, V. (2025) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-024-02358-2 · Cited by 31
The use of personas to involve consumers in healthcare co-design: a scoping review
Dominello, A., Cheek, C., & Clay‐Williams, R. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-12786-7 · Cited by 31
Brand, G., River, J., Molloy, R., Kemp, H., & Bellingham, B. (2022) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105616 · Cited by 30
Agnello, D. M., Balaskas, G., Steiner, A., & CHASTIN, S. F. M. (2024) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/59772 · Cited by 30
Public and participant involvement as a pathway to inclusive dementia research
Walter, S., Ardle, R. M., Largent, E. A., Edelmayer, R. M., Sexton, C. E., Sandoval, S. L., Medsger, H. B., Meserve, N. F., Samaroo, R., Sierra, C., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14350 · Cited by 29
LaFond, A., & Cherney, M. (2021) · Global Health Science and Practice · doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00334 · Cited by 29
Implementing and evaluating co-designed change in health
Harrison, R., Shé, É. N., & Debono, D. S. (2022) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/01410768211070206 · Cited by 29
Kuruppu, N. R., Chaboyer, W. P., Abayadeera, A., & Ranse, K. (2023) · Australian Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2022.12.009 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., & Bragge, P.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Slattery, Peter
- Venue
- Health Research Policy and Systems
- Published
- 2020-02-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7014755
- OpenAlex
- W3008652539
- Cited by
- 1,313
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 259 · 2025: 311 · 2024: 315 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Research Policy and Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Transport Accident Commission
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- research co-design, end-user involvement, patient and public involvement, research waste, learning planning, research engagement
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Research Design, Biomedical Research, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
