Cited by 565Workplace Health and Well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorStress and Burnout Research

Leadership, Job Well-Being, and Health Effects—A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Kuoppala, Jaana, Lamminpää, Anne, Liira, Juha, Vainio, Harri·2008·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic literature analysis was to study the association between leadership and well-being at work and work-related health. These intermediate outcomes are supposed to predict work-related loss of productivity and disability at work. METHODS: Original articles published in 1970 to 2005 were searched in MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases in a systematic manner. The main search terms were leadership, job satisfaction, well-being, sick leave, and disability pension. Out of 303 references, 93 publications were retrieved. In addition, other sources produced 69 articles. The strength of evidence was evaluated comprehensively. Altogether, 109 articles were thoroughly analyzed; our conclusions are based on 27 articles providing the best evidence. RESULTS: There was moderate evidence that leadership is associated with job well-being (risk ratio [RR] 1.40, range 1.36 to 1.57), sick leave (RR 0.73, range 0.70 to 0.89), and disability pension (RR 0.46, range 0.42 to 0.59). The evidence was weak on that leadership is associated with job satisfaction (median RR 2.23, range 1.30 to 3.51) but not with job performance (RR 1.13, range 0.55 to 1.20). CONCLUSIONS: There is a relative lack of well-founded prospective studies targeting the association between leadership and employee health, but the few available good studies suggest an important role of leadership on employee job satisfaction, job well-being, sickness absences, and disability pensions. The relationship between leadership and job performance remains unclear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e31817e918d

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Literature reviews and meta-analyses on leadership and well-being/health often do not consider the role of digital technology.

    “or deal with the relationship between leadership and well-being or health without considering the role of digital technology (Harms et al. 2017;Inceoglu et al. 2018;Kuoppala et al. 2008;Montano et al. 2017;Skakon et al. 2010)”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Kuoppala et al. 2008

  • Technostress was often missed in literature reviews and meta-analyses dealing with leadership and followers' well-being.

    “Hereby closing a gap in current literature, as technostress represents a topic that was up to now often missed in literature reviews and meta-analyses that deal with leadership and followers' well-being (Harms et al. 2017;Inceoglu et al. 2018;Kuoppala et al. 2008;Montano et al. 2017;Skakon et al. 2010).”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Kuoppala et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuoppala, J., Lamminpää, A., Liira, J., & Vainio, H.
Affiliations
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
Corresponding author
Lamminpää, Anne
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2008-08
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
904-915
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971253095
Cited by
565
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
leadership, job well-being, job satisfaction, sick leave, disability pension, work-related health, employee health, employee performance, productivity loss
MeSH terms
Humans, Job Satisfaction, Leadership, Retirement, Risk, Organizational Culture, Sick Leave

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review