CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 137

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of carnivore, omnivore, and herbivore mammalian genomes with a new leopard assembly

Kim, Soonok, Cho, Yun Sung, Kim, Hak-Min, Chung, Oksung, Kim, Hyunho, Jho, Sungwoong, Seomun, Hong, Kim, Jeongho, Bang, Woo Young, Kim, Changmu, An, Junghwa, Bae, Chang Hwan, Bhak, Youngjune, Jeon, Sungwon, Yoon, Hyejun, Kim, Yumi, Jun, JeHoon, Lee, HyeJin, Cho, Suan, Uphyrkina, Olga, Kostyria, Aleksey, Goodrich, John, Miquelle, Dale, Roelke, Melody, Lewis, John, Yurchenko, Andrey, Bankevich, Anton, Cho, Juok, Lee, Semin, Edwards, Jeremy S., Weber, Jessica A., Cook, Jo, Kim, Sangsoo, Lee, Hang, Manica, Andrea, Lee, Ilbeum, O’Brien, Stephen J., Bhak, Jong, Yeo, Joo-Hong·2016·Genome Biology
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-1071-4PMC PMC5090899
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-016-1071-4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Van Valkenburgh B. Major patterns in the history of carnivorous mammals. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 1999;27:463–93. · DOI
  2. Van Valkenburgh B, Wang X, Damuth J. Cope’s rule, hypercarnivory, and extinction in North American canids. Science. 2004;306:101–4. · DOI
  3. Fedriani JM, Fuller TK, Sauvajot RM, York EC. Competition and intraguild predation among three sympatric carnivores. Oecologia. 2000;125:258–70. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Legrand-Defretin V. Differences between cats and dogs: a nutritional view. Proc Nutr Soc. 1994;53:15–24. · DOI
  5. de Sousa-Pereira P, Cova M, Abrantes J, Ferreira R, Trindade F, Barros A, et al. Cross-species comparison of mammalian saliva using an LC-MALDI based proteomic approach. Proteomics. 2015;15:1598–607. · DOI
  6. Stevens CE, Hume ID. Comparative Physiology of the Vertebrate Digestive System. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
  7. Smalley KA, Rogers QR, Morris JG. Methionine requirement of kittens given amino acid diets containing adequate cystine. Br J Nutr. 1983;49:411–7. · DOI
  8. Sturman JA, Palackal T, Imaki H, Moretz RC, French J, Wisniewski HM. Nutritional taurine deficiency and feline pregnancy and outcome. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1987;217:113–24. · DOI
  9. Boudreau JC, Sivakumar L, Do LT, White TD, Oravec J, Hoang NK. Neurophysiology of geniculate ganglion (facial nerve) taste systems: species comparisons. Chem Senses. 1985;10:89–127. · DOI
  10. Li X, Glaser D, Li W, Johnson WE, O’Brien SJ, Beauchamp GK, et al. Analyses of sweet receptor gene (Tas1r2) and preference for sweet stimuli in species of Carnivora. J Hered. 2009;100 Suppl 1:S90–100. · DOI
  11. Heffner RS, Heffner HE. Hearing range of the domestic cat. Hear Res. 1985;19:85–8. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Pontius JU, Mullikin JC, Smith DR. Agencourt Sequencing Team, Lindblad-Toh K, Gnerre S, et al. Initial sequence and comparative analysis of the cat genome. Genome Res. 2007;17:1675–89. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Tamazian G, Simonov S, Dobrynin P, Makunin A, Logachev A, Komissarov A, et al. Annotated features of domestic cat - Felis catus genome. Gigascience. 2014;3:13. · DOI
  14. Uphyrkina O, Johnson WE, Quigley H, Miquelle D, Marker L, Bush M, et al. Phylogenetics, genome diversity and origin of modern leopard, Panthera pardus. Mol Ecol. 2001;10:2617–33. · DOI
  15. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience. 2012;1:18. · DOI
  16. Bankevich A, Pevzner PA. TruSPAdes: barcode assembly of TruSeq synthetic long reads. Nat Methods. 2016;13:248–50. · DOI
  17. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Owen D, Pemberton D. Tasmanian Devil: A Unique and Threatened Animal. Sydney: Allen & Unwin; 2005.
  19. Shrestha B, Reed JM, Starks PT, Kaufman GE, Goldstone JV, Roelke ME, et al. Evolution of a major drug metabolizing enzyme defect in the domestic cat and other felidae: phylogenetic timing and the role of hypercarnivory. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18046. · DOI
  20. Bock KW. The UDP-glycosyltransferase (UGT) superfamily expressed in humans, insects and plants: Animal-plant arms-race and co-evolution. Biochem Pharmacol. 2016;99:11–7. · DOI
  21. Meech R, Miners JO, Lewis BC, Mackenzie PI. The glycosidation of xenobiotics and endogenous compounds: versatility and redundancy in the UDP glycosyltransferase superfamily. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;134:200–18. · DOI
  22. Meech R, Mubarokah N, Shivasami A, Rogers A, Nair PC, Hu DG, et al. A novel function for UDP glycosyltransferase 8: galactosidation of bile acids. Mol Pharmacol. 2015;87:442–50. · DOI
  23. McGeachin RL, Akin JR. Amylase levels in the tissues and body fluids of the domestic cat (Felis catus). Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1979;63:437–9. · DOI
  24. MacDonald ML, Rogers QR, Morris JG. Nutrition of the domestic cat, a mammalian carnivore. Annu Rev Nutr. 1984;4:521–62. · DOI
  25. Seritrakul P, Samarut E, Lama TT, Gibert Y, Laudet V, Jackman WR. Retinoic acid expands the evolutionarily reduced dentition of zebrafish. FASEB J. 2012;26:5014–24. · DOI
  26. Togari A, Kondo M, Arai M, Matsumoto S. Effects of retinoic acid on bone formation and resorption in cultured mouse calvaria. Gen Pharmacol. 1991;22:287–92. · DOI
  27. Trappe TA, Liu SZ. Effects of prostaglandins and COX-inhibiting drugs on skeletal muscle adaptations to exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1985;115:909–19. · DOI
  28. Schermerhorn T. Normal glucose metabolism in carnivores overlaps with diabetes pathology in non-carnivores. Front Endocrinol. 2013;4:188. · DOI
  29. Raimondo A, Rees MG, Gloyn AL. Glucokinase regulatory protein: complexity at the crossroads of triglyceride and glucose metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2015;26:88–95. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Wang ZY, Jin L, Tan H, Irwin DM. Evolution of hepatic glucose metabolism: liver-specific glucokinase deficiency explained by parallel loss of the gene for glucokinase regulatory protein (GCKR). PLoS One. 2013;8:e60896. · DOI
  31. Peng X, Alföldi J, Gori K, Eisfeld AJ, Tyler SR, Tisoncik-Go J, et al. The draft genome sequence of the ferret (Mustela putorius furo) facilitates study of human respiratory disease. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:1250–5. · DOI
  32. Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1586–91. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:2472–9. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Irizarry KJ, Malladi SB, Gao X, Mitsouras K, Melendez L, Burris PA, et al. Sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of 1227 Felis catus cDNA sequences enriched for developmental, clinical and nutritional phenotypes. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:31. · DOI
  35. Miyasaka N, Knaut H, Yoshihara Y. Cxcl12/Cxcr4 chemokine signaling is required for placode assembly and sensory axon pathfinding in the zebrafish olfactory system. Development. 2007;134:2459–68. · DOI
  36. Lieberam I, Agalliu D, Nagasawa T, Ericson J, Jessell TM. A Cxcl12-Cxcr4 chemokine signaling pathway defines the initial trajectory of mammalian motor axons. Neuron. 2005;47:667–79. · DOI
  37. Fen JQ, Zhang J, Dallas SL, Lu Y, Chen S, Tan X, et al. Dentin matrix protein 1, a target molecule for Cbfa1 in bone, is a unique bone marker gene. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1822–31. · DOI
  38. Li G, Bunn JR, Mushipe MT, He Q, Chen X. Effects of pleiotrophin (PTN) over-expression on mouse long bone development, fracture healing and bone repair. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005;76:299–306. · DOI
  39. Yang Z, Bielawski JP. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000;15:496–503. · DOI
  40. Ferguson LR. Meat and cancer. Meat Sci. 2010;84:308–13. · DOI
  41. Oostindjer M, Alexander J, Amdam GV, Andersen G, Bryan NS, Chen D, et al. The role of red and processed meat in colorectal cancer development: a perspective. Meta Sci. 2014;97:583–96. · DOI
  42. Foote AD, Liu Y, Thomas GW, Vinař T, Alföldi J, Deng J, et al. Convergent evolution of the genomes of marine mammals. Nat Genet. 2015;47:272–5. · DOI
  43. Lain E, Carnejac S, Escher P, Wilson MC, Lømo T, Gajendran N, et al. A novel role for embigin to promote sprouting of motor nerve terminals at the neuromuscular junction. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:8930–9. · DOI
  44. Johnson WE, Eizirik E, Pecon-Slattery J, Murphy WJ, Antunes A, Teeling E, et al. The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment. Science. 2006;311:73–7. · DOI
  45. O’Brien SJ, Johnson WE. The evolution of cats. Genomic paw prints in the DNA of the world’s wild cats have clarified the cat family tree and uncovered several remarkable migrations in their past. Sci Am. 2007;297:68–75. · DOI
  46. Hedges SB, Dudley J, Kumar S. TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2971–2. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Camazine S. Olfactory aposematism: Association of food toxicity with naturally occurring odor. J Chem Ecol. 1985;11:1289–95. · DOI
  48. Forrest JL, Wikramanayake E, Shrestha R, Areendran G, Gyeltshen K, Maheshwari A, et al. Conservation and climate change: Assessing the vulnerability of snow leopard habitat to treeline shift in the Himalaya. Biol Conserv. 2012;150:129–35. · DOI
  49. Luo SJ, Zhang Y, Johnson WE, Miao L, Martelli P, Antunes A, et al. Sympatric Asian felid phylogeography reveals a major Indochinese-Sundaic divergence. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:2072–92. · DOI
  50. Li H, Durbin R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature. 2011;475:493–6. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Rand JS, Fleeman LM, Farrow HA, Appleton DJ, Lederer R. Canine and feline diabetes mellitus: nature or nurture? J Nutr. 2004;134 Suppl 8:2072S–80S. · DOI
  52. Henson MS, O’Brien TD. Feline models of type 2 diabetes mellitus. ILAR J. 2006;47:234–42. · DOI
  53. Chung O, Jin S, Cho YS, Lim J, Kim H, Jho S, et al. The first whole genome and transcriptome of the cinereous vulture reveals adaptation in the gastric and immune defense systems and possible convergent evolution between the Old and New World vultures. Genome Biol. 2015;16:215. · DOI
  54. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. ArXiv. 2013;1303:3997.
  55. She R, Chu JS, Wang K, Pei J, Chen N. GenBlastA: enabling BLAST to identify homologous gene sequences. Genome Res. 2009;19:143–9. · DOI
  56. Slater GS, Birney E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:31. · DOI
  57. Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S, Morgenstern B. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W435–9. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Li L, Stoeckert Jr CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13:2178–89. · DOI · Paper page
  59. Tamura K, Battistuzzi FU, Billing-Ross P, Murillo O, Filipski A, Kumar S. Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:19333–8. · DOI
  60. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HM, editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press; 1969. p. 21–132. · DOI · Paper page
  61. Cunningham F, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Billis K, Brent S, et al. Ensembl 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D662–9. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Nyakatura K, Bininda-Emonds OR. Updating the evolutionary history of Carnivora (Mammalia): a new species-level supertree complete with divergence time estimates. BMC Biol. 2012;10:12. · DOI
  63. Liu S, Lorenzen ED, Fumagalli M, Li B, Harris K, Xiong Z, et al. Population genomics reveal recent speciation and rapid evolutionary adaptation in polar bears. Cell. 2014;157:785–94. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Murchison EP, Schulz-Trieglaff OB, Ning Z, Alexandrov LB, Bauer MJ, Fu B, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the Tasmanian devil and its transmissible cancer. Cell. 2012;148:780–91. · DOI
  65. Han MV, Thomas GW, Lugo-Martinez J, Hahn MW. Estimating gene gain and loss rates in the presence of error in genome assembly and annotation using CAFE 3. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1987–97. · DOI
  66. Löytynoja A, Goldman N. An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:10557–62. · DOI
  67. Nielsen R, Bustamante C, Clark AG, Glanowski S, Sackton TB, Hubisz MJ, et al. A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e170. · DOI
  68. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46688. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57:289–300. · DOI · Paper page
  71. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Prado-Martinez J, Sudmant PH, Kidd JM, Li H, Kelley JL, Lorente-Galdos B, et al. Great ape genetic diversity and population history. Nature. 2013;499:471–5. · DOI
  73. Kaeuffer R, Pontier D, Devillard S, Perrin N. Effective size of two feral domestic cat populations (Felis catus L): effect of the mating system. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:483–90. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S., Cho, Y. S., Kim, H.-M., Chung, O., Kim, H., Jho, S., Seomun, H., Kim, J., Bang, W. Y., Kim, C., An, J., Bae, C. H., Bhak, Y., Jeon, S., Yoon, H., Kim, Y., Jun, J., Lee, H., Cho, S., Uphyrkina, O., Kostyria, A., Goodrich, J., Miquelle, D., Roelke, M., Lewis, J., Yurchenko, A., Bankevich, A., Cho, J., Lee, S., Edwards, J. S., Weber, J. A., Cook, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., Manica, A., Lee, I., O’Brien, S. J., Bhak, J., & Yeo, J.-H.
Venue
Genome Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-11-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
1474-760X
DOI
10.1186/s13059-016-1071-4
PMC
PMC5090899
Cited by
137
References
11
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR201503101, NIBR201603104)
  • Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (1.150014.01)
  • Russian Ministry of Science Mega-grant (no.11.G34.31.0068)
  • Saint Petersburg State University (No 15.61.95112015)
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (S0177-16-1046)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review