Cited by 72Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Characterization of juvenile play in rats: importance of sex of self and sex of partner

Open access
Argue, Kathryn J., McCarthy, Margaret M.·2015·Biology of Sex Differences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Juvenile social play is observed in many mammalian species, and its disruption in several neuropsychiatric disorders has greatly increased interest in understanding the origins and sources of variability in this behavior. METHODS: We quantified social play behavior in juvenile rats and investigated the impact of sex and familiarity of the play partner. Sex differences in play behavior were investigated by comparing males and females from either same- or mixed-sex pairs with data pooled over 12 days of analysis. Whether play was altered based on the sex of the play partner was assessed using a paired analysis to compare play with a same- or opposite-sex play partner for both males and females. Additionally, a repeated measures design was utilized to determine whether play changed with increasing age. On postnatal day 33, a novel play partner was introduced. We used a repeated measures analysis to compare postnatal day 33 with the previous day. These approaches were used to assess the effects of age, sex, sex of partner, and familiarity of partner on total social play behavior as well as how play was broken down into components, such as pouncing, pinning, chasing, and boxing. RESULTS: There were sex differences in total frequency of play, and specific parameters of play behavior, such as chasing, pouncing, pinning, and boxing. Additionally, males significantly altered their play behavior in response to the sex of their play partner, whereas females were more sensitive to the familiarity of the play partner. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides critical groundwork for uncovering factors that regulate social play behavior and can be used to guide future mechanistic based work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13293-015-0034-x

Cites

58 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is the female rats who are sensitive to mixed-sex housing.

    “Interestingly, it seems that it is the female rats who are sensitive to mixed‐sex housing.”

    From Partner Choice and Context‐Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough‐and‐Tumble Play (2026) · cites this paper as Argue and McCarthy 2015

    The Methods (Animals; page not provided) say the rats were housed in same-sex groups, so this study did not test mixed-sex housing. The Discussion (page not provided) reports a prior finding that cagemates’ sex affected males’ social behavior, with no effect observed in females—the opposite of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Males play more when partnered with females than when with males, when playing in dyads.

    “Given that males play more when partnered with females than when with males, when playing in dyads, and that females play at similar levels regardless of the sex of the partner (Argue and McCarthy 2015)”

    From Partner Choice and Context‐Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough‐and‐Tumble Play (2026) · cites this paper as Argue and McCarthy 2015

    The Results section, “Play partner affected the time spent engaged in play,” reports that male–male pairs spent more time playing than mixed-sex pairs—the opposite of the claim about males. The Results section on total frequency finds no significant change for males or females by partner sex; it supports the female comparison for frequency, but not the asserted increase for males. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When reared in mixed-sex groups, females typically play less than males, even when tested in same-sex pairs.

    “When reared in mixed‐sex groups, females typically play less than males, even when tested in same‐sex pairs.”

    From Partner Choice and Context‐Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough‐and‐Tumble Play (2026) · cites this paper as Argue and McCarthy 2015

    The Results section reports that males played more frequently than females even in same-sex test pairs. But the Discussion says the animals were housed in same-sex groups, so this study does not establish the claim for rats reared in mixed-sex groups. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A reduction in female play, and not a change in the frequency of male play, drives the sex effect.

    “Indeed, it is a reduction in female play, and not a change in the frequency of male play, that drives the sex effect”

    From Partner Choice and Context‐Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough‐and‐Tumble Play (2026) · cites this paper as Argue and McCarthy 2015

    The Results (Fig. 1c; page unavailable) report reduced play when females were paired with novel female partners, and the Discussion says this did not occur in males paired with novel partners. But the paper does not say that this female-specific response drives the overall sex difference in play; that reduction was limited to the novel-partner condition. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Females play at similar levels regardless of the sex of the partner.

    “Given that males play more when partnered with females than when with males, when playing in dyads, and that females play at similar levels regardless of the sex of the partner (Argue and McCarthy 2015)”

    From Partner Choice and Context‐Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough‐and‐Tumble Play (2026) · cites this paper as Argue and McCarthy 2015

    The Results report that females’ total frequency of play did not change significantly with partner sex, supporting the claim when 'levels' means frequency. The Discussion says time spent playing increased when females were paired with males, so the broader claim that their play was similar regardless of partner sex is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Argue, K. J., & McCarthy, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Argue, Kathryn J.
Venue
Biology of Sex Differences
Published
2015-09-10
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
16-16
ISSN
2042-6410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139547244
Cited by
71
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology of Sex Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (Grant code:RO1MH52716-018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
sex differences, pinning, pursuit, boxing, postnatal development, rats, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review