Cited by 69Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Use of wearable devices for post-discharge monitoring of ICU patients: a feasibility study

Open access
for the WEARable Information Technology for hospital INpatients (WEARIT-IN) study group, Kroll, Ryan R., McKenzie, Erica D., Boyd, J. Gordon, Sheth, Prameet, Howes, Daniel, Wood, Michael, Maslove, David M.·2017·Journal of Intensive Care

Abstract

Wearable devices generate signals detecting activity, sleep, and heart rate, all of which could enable detailed and near-continuous characterization of recovery following critical illness. To determine the feasibility of using a wrist-worn personal fitness tracker among patients recovering from critical illness, we conducted a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of 50 stable ICU patients. We assessed device wearability, the extent of data capture, sensitivity and specificity for detecting heart rate excursions, and correlations with questionnaire-derived sleep quality measures. Wearable devices were worn over a 24-h period, with excellent capture of data. While specificity for the detection of tachycardia was high (98.8%), sensitivity was low to moderate (69.5%). There was a moderate correlation between wearable-derived sleep duration and questionnaire-derived sleep quality (r = 0.33, P = 0.03). Devices were well-tolerated and demonstrated no degradation in quality of data acquisition over time. We found that wearable devices could be worn by patients recovering from critical illness and could generate useful data for the majority of patients with little adverse effect. Further development and study are needed to better define and enhance the role of wearables in the monitoring of post-ICU recovery. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02527408

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40560-017-0261-9

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a recent feasibility study, Fitbit Charge monitoring of post-ICU convalescence in 50 stable ICU patients over 24 h had tachycardia detection sensitivity 69.5% and specificity 98.8%.

    “Tachycardia detection had 69.5% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity [22].”

    From Wearables and the Medical Revolution (2018) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
for the WEARable Information Technology for hospital INpatients (WEARIT-IN) study group, Kroll, R. R., McKenzie, E. D., Boyd, J. G., Sheth, P., Howes, D., Wood, M., & Maslove, D. M.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Maslove, David M.
Venue
Journal of Intensive Care
Published
2017-11-21
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
64-64
ISSN
2052-0492 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769216997
Cited by
69
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Intensive Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Southeastern Ontario Academic Medical Organization (AHSC AFP Innovation Fund)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
wearable devices, wearable activity trackers, post-ICU recovery, critical illness, intensive care unit patients, tachycardia detection, heart rate monitoring, sleep quality, sleep duration, post-discharge monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review