Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

London–East Anglia randomised controlled trial of cognitive–behavioural therapy for psychosis: II: Predictors of outcome

Garety, Philippa, Fowler, David, Kuipers, Elizabeth, Freeman, Daniel, Dunn, Graham, Bebbington, Paul, Hadley, Clare, Jones, Steven·1997·British Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1192/bjp.171.5.420
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Despite growing evidence of the effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) for psychosis, typically only about 50% of patients show a positive response to treatment. This paper reports the first comprehensive investigation of factors which predict treatment outcome. Method: In a randomised controlled trial of CBT for medication-resistant psychosis (see Part I) measures were taken at baseline of demographic, clinical and cognitive variables. Changes over time were assessed on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the relationship between potential predictor variables and outcome was investigated using analysis of variance and covariance. Results: A number of baseline variables were identified as predictors of good outcome in the CBT group. Key predictors were a response indicating cognitive flexibility concerning delusions (P=0.005) and the number of recent admissions (P=0.002). Outcome was less predictable in the control group and was not predicted by any cognitive variable. Conclusions: Good outcome is strongly predicted in patients with persistent delusions by a cognitive measure, while this was not the case in controls. Thus we argue that positive outcome in CBT is due in part to specific effects on delusional thinking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.171.5.420

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00059-3 · DOI
  2. Amador, 1993, Assessment of insight in psychosis, American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 873, 10.1176/ajp.150.6.873 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1192/bjp.163.1.69 · DOI
  4. 1992, SCAN: Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry.
  5. Chadwick, 1996, Cognitive Therapy for Delusions, Voices and Paranoia.
  6. Neale, 1988, Delusional Beliefs, 138
  7. Fowler, 1995, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychosis: Theory and Practice.
  8. 10.1192/bjp.171.4.319 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Nelson, 1982, The National Adult Reading Test.
  10. 10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80055-0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1037/0022-006X.58.2.225 · DOI
  12. Taylor, 1994, Violence and Mental Disorder: Developments in Risk Assessment, 161
  13. Garety, 1994, Delusions. Investigations into the Psychology of Delusional Reasoning.
  14. 10.1017/S003329170001254X · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1097/00005053-199104000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90131-7 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80017-7 · DOI
  18. 1987, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  19. 10.1192/bjp.162.4.524 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ammons, 1962, Quick Test.
  21. 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Halligan, 1996, Methods in Madness: Case studies in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry.
  23. 10.1192/bjp.157.6.853 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  25. Williams, 1992, The Psychological Treatment of Depression

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Garety, P., Fowler, D., Kuipers, E., Freeman, D., Dunn, G., Bebbington, P., Hadley, C., & Jones, S.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Published
1997-11
Volume
171
Issue
5
Pages
420-426
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
DOI
10.1192/bjp.171.5.420
OpenAlex
W2075393761
Cited by
318
References
5
FWCI
11.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 7368 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.