CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 869Schizophrenia research and treatmentSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health and Psychiatry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Excess mortality of schizophrenia: A meta-analysis

Brown, Steve·1997·British Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1192/bjp.171.6.502
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper presents a structured review of the published information on the mortality of schizophrenia. METHOD: A meta-analysis of the literature. RESULTS: Schizophrenia has a significantly increased mortality from natural and unnatural causes. Twenty-eight percent of the excess mortality is attributable to suicide and 12% to accidents. The rest of the excess mortality is from the same broad range of conditions which cause deaths in the general population. Further interpretation is hampered by confounding variables, wide confidence intervals and reservations about generalising from individual cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests that schizophrenia is associated with a large increased mortality from suicide and a moderate increased mortality from natural causes. A number of possible interventions have been identified, but we do not yet have reliable means of detecting any changes in mortality which might result.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.171.6.502

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dupont, 1986, Psychiatric Case Registers in Public Health
  2. 1995, 1993 Mortality Statistics. Cause

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 869

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brown, S.
Affiliations
Royal South Hants Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, Steve
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Published
1997-12
Volume
171
Issue
6
Pages
502-508
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
DOI
10.1192/bjp.171.6.502
OpenAlex
W2144334285
Cited by
869
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 37
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 7337 d)
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, excess mortality, suicide, accidental death, natural death, mortality risk factors, confounding variables
MeSH terms
Accidents, Cause of Death, Follow-Up Studies, Homicide, Humans, Schizophrenia, Sex Factors, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review