Cited by 268Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and Psychiatry

Cognitive therapy for command hallucinations: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Trower, Peter, Birchwood, Max, Meaden, Alan, Byrne, Sarah, Nelson, Angela, Ross, Kerry·2004·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Command hallucinations are a distressing and high-risk group of symptoms that have long been recognised but little understood, with few effective treatments. In line with our recent research, we propose that the development of an effective cognitive therapy for command hallucinations (CTCH) would be enhanced by applying insights from social rank theory. Aims: We tested the efficacy of CTCH in reducing beliefs about the power of voices and thereby compliance, in a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Method: A total of 38 patients with command hallucinations, with which they had recently complied with serious consequences, were allocated randomly to CTCH or treatment as usual and followed up at 6 months and 12 months. Results: Large and significant reductions in compliance behaviour were obtained favouring the cognitive therapy group (effect size=1.1). Improvements were also observed in the CTCH but not the control group in degree of conviction in the power and superiority of the voices and the need to comply, and in levels of distress and depression. No change in voice topography (frequency, loudness, content) was observed. The differences were maintained at 12 months' follow-up. Conclusions: The results support the efficacy of cognitive therapy for CTCH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.184.4.312

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of good emotion regulation strategies leads to a reduction in the intensity and distress associated with auditory hallucinations.

    “Studies have shown that the use of good emotion regulation strategies leads to a reduction in the intensity and distress associated with auditory hallucinations (32, 33).”

    From Mobile intervention for individuals with psychosis, dual disorders, and their common comorbidities: A literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [33]

    The “Distress and depression” section reports that the intensity of distress fell significantly in the cognitive-therapy group at six months, but the groups no longer differed at 12 months. The “Psychotic symptoms” and “Change in beliefs” sections report no sustained reduction in hallucinations themselves. The intervention targeted beliefs about the power of command voices, not emotion-regulation strategies as such. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]3. Birchwood, M. & Spencer, E. Birchwood, M. & Spencer, E. (2002) (2002) Psychotherapies Psychotherapies for schizophrenia. In for schizophrenia. In Schizophrenia: WPA Series in Schizophrenia: WPA Series in Evidence Based Psychiatry Evidence Based Psychiatry (eds M. Maj & N. Sartorius), (eds M. Maj & N. Sartorius), 2nd edn, pp.147^241. Chichester: Wiley. 2nd edn, pp.147^241. Chichester: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trower, P., Birchwood, M., Meaden, A., Byrne, S., Nelson, A., & Ross, K.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Birchwood, Max
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-04
Volume
184
Issue
4
Pages
312-320
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2075213101
Cited by
268
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
command hallucinations, cognitive therapy, compliance behavior, psychosis, depression, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review