Cited by 45COVID-19 and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and Access

Loneliness, coping, suicidal thoughts and self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional UK population survey

Open access
John, Ann, Lee, Sze Chim, Solomon, Susan, Crepaz-Keay, David, McDaid, Shari, Morton, Alec, Davidson, Gavin, Van Bortel, Tine +1 more·2021·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives There has been speculation on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated lockdown on suicidal thoughts and self-harm and the factors associated with any change. We aimed to assess the effects and change in effects of risk factors including loneliness and coping, as well as pre-existing mental health conditions on suicidal thoughts and self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design This study was a repeated cross-sectional online population-based survey. Participants and measures Non-probability quota sampling was adopted on the UK adult population and four waves of data were analysed during the pandemic (17 March 2020 to 29 May 2020). Outcomes were suicidal thoughts and self-harm associated with the pandemic while loneliness, coping, pre-existing mental health conditions, employment status and demographics were covariates. We ran binomial regressions to evaluate the adjusted risks of the studied covariates as well as the changes in effects over time. Results The proportion of individuals who felt lonely increased sharply from 9.8% to 23.9% after the UK lockdown began. Young people (aged 18–24 years), females, students, those who were unemployed and individuals with pre-existing mental health conditions were more likely to report feeling lonely and not coping well. 7.7%–10.0% and 1.9%–2.2% of respondents reported having suicidal thoughts and self-harm associated with the pandemic respectively throughout the period studied. Results from cross-tabulation and adjusted regression analyses showed young adults, coping poorly and with pre-existing mental health conditions were significantly associated with suicidal thoughts and self-harm. Loneliness was significantly associated with suicidal thoughts but not self-harm. Conclusions The association between suicidality, loneliness and coping was evident in young people during the early stages of the pandemic. Developing effective interventions designed and coproduced to address loneliness and promote coping strategies during prolonged social isolation may promote mental health and help mitigate suicidal thoughts and self-harm associated with the pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048123

Cites

50 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Perlman D, Peplau L. Toward a social psychology of loneliness. Pers Relatsh 1981; 3: 31– 56.
  2. [57]Odd D, Sleap V, Appleby L. Child suicide rates during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: real-time surveillance. Bristol, 2020. Available: https://www.ncmd.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/REF253-2020-NCMD-Summary-Report-on-Child-Suicide-July-2020.pdf PMC8604801 34841386

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
John, A., Lee, S. C., Solomon, S., Crepaz-Keay, D., McDaid, S., Morton, A., Davidson, G., Van Bortel, T., & Kousoulis, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Mental Health Foundation (GB)
  • Mental Health Foundation, Colechurch House, 1 London Bridge Walk, London, UK
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Cambridge Public Health, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Corresponding author
John, Ann
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-12
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
e048123
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205841353
Cited by
45
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Mental Health Foundation (MHF/G105979)
  • National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (NIHR ARC EoE/U.SY.SYBJ.GAAB)
  • the Adolescent Mental Health Data Platform (MQBF/3 ADP)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
loneliness, coping, suicidal ideation, self-harm, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, mental health, young adults, social isolation, pre-existing mental health conditions, employment status, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review