Cited by 13Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Imagery rescripting of early memories in health anxiety disorder: A feasibility and non-randomized pilot study

Nilsson, Jan-Erik, Knutsson, Jens, Jalamo, Björn-Sindre, Lundh, Lars-Gunnar·2019·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives Health anxiety is a common problem and is associated with frequent primary care visits, increased health care costs, and poor prognosis and low recovery rates. Previous research shows that imagery rescripting (IR) is a promising treatment technique for various disorders. To date, IR has not been examined as a viable treatment for health anxiety. The purpose of the present feasibility and pilot study was to test one session of IR of early anxiety-laden health-related memories in a small sample of patients suffering from HA.Methods A within-groups design was used with a sample of 18 patients suffering from HA, who first underwent a control condition (reading about CBT), and then one week later a session of IR. After another week, the effects were measured on self-reported health anxiety and early anxiety provoking health-related mental images (memories).Results After the IR intervention, significant reductions of health anxiety and health worry, as well as image and memory distress, vividness and frequency were observed.Limitations Among the most important limitations are the absence of an active control group, the small size of the sample, the absence of a longer follow-up, and the use of only self-report measures.Conclusions The results suggest that IR is a feasible technique in the treatment of health anxiety, and that more controlled research along these lines may be worthwhile.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101491

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nilsson, J.-E., Knutsson, J., Jalamo, B.-S., & Lundh, L.-G.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Nilsson, Jan-Erik
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
65
Pages
101491
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947794053
Cited by
13
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
imagery rescripting, health anxiety, early memories, health worry, memory vividness, cognitive behavioral therapy, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review