Cited by 355Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 45 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Virtual reality compared with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A three-arm randomised controlled trial

Open access

Abstract

Background: People with social anxiety disorder (SAD) fear social interactions and may be reluctant to seek treatments involving exposure to social situations. Social exposure conducted in virtual reality (VR), embedded in individual cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT), could be an answer. Aims: To show that conducting VR exposure in CBT for SAD is effective and is more practical for therapists than conducting exposure in vivo. Method: Participants were randomly assigned to either VR exposure ( n = 17), in vivo exposure ( n = 22) or waiting list ( n = 20). Participants in the active arms received individual CBT for 14 weekly sessions and outcome was assessed with questionnaires and a behaviour avoidance test. (Trial registration number ISRCTN99747069.) Results: Improvements were found on the primary (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and all five secondary outcome measures in both CBT groups compared with the waiting list. Conducting exposure in VR was more effective at post-treatment than in vivo on the primary outcome measure and on one secondary measure. Improvements were maintained at the 6-month follow-up. VR was significantly more practical for therapists than in vivo exposure. Conclusions: Using VR can be advantageous over standard CBT as a potential solution for treatment avoidance and as an efficient, cost-effective and practical medium of exposure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.184234

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 45 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 25 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 35
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 39
61 of 61
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In vivo exposure is the gold-standard condition for cognitive-behavioural therapy in social anxiety disorder.

    “large with the gold-standard condition (i.e.Cohen's f of 0.4, for a total n of 78).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants in the in virtuo condition complied with the instruction not to engage in any in vivo exposure.

    “Participants in the in virtuo condition were instructed not to engage in any exposure in vivo.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Group CBT is as effective as individual CBT and is widely used.

    “although the group format is equally effective and widely used”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Therapists may be reluctant to adopt virtual reality.

    “Therapists may be reluctant to use VR”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Virtual reality is rapidly becoming more affordable.

    “rapidly becoming more affordable”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • In-vivo addiction percentage is incorrect

    Minor

    Two participants in the in-vivo group of 22 represent 9.1%, not the reported 3.4%.

    Reported 3.4 · recomputed 9.090909

  • White participants' overall percentage is too high

    Minor

    The table reports 55 White participants out of a total sample of 59. That is 93.2%, not 94.8%.

    Reported 94.8 · recomputed 93.220339

  • Low-income percentage does not match the count

    Minor

    Sixteen of the 59 participants is 27.1%, rather than the reported 21.1%.

    Reported 21.1 · recomputed 27.118644

  • Medication percentage does not match the sample size

    Minor

    The reported nine participants represent 15.3% of the stated total sample of 59, not 16.7%.

    Reported 16.7 · recomputed 15.254237

  • Addiction count does not equal the group counts

    Minor

    The three group counts for addiction add to four participants, whereas the total column reports five.

    Reported 5 · recomputed 4

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bouchard, 2001, Exploring new dimensions in the assessment of virtual reality induced side effects, J Computer Inform Techn, 1, 20
  2. Bouchard, 2009, Side effects of immersions in virtual reality for anxious people, J Cyber Ther Rehabil, 2
  3. Tisseau, 2008, 1st Workshop on SMA in Biology at meso or macroscopic scales, Paris, July 2, 2008
  4. Bouchard, 2014, Advances in Virtual Reality and Anxiety Disorders.
  5. First, 2002, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (Research edn).
  6. Bouchard, 2007, Revising the factor structure of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, Ann Rev Cyberther Telemed, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 355

Metadata

Authors
Bouchard, S., Dumoulin, S., Robillard, G., Guitard, T., Klinger, É., Forget, H., Loranger, C., & Roucaut, F. X.
Affiliations
Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA)
Corresponding author
Bouchard, Stéphane
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-04
Volume
210
Issue
4
Pages
276-283
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2565451694
Cited by
354
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10
FWCI
31.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs (950-10762)
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (10762)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, virtual reality exposure, in vivo exposure, cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure therapy, treatment avoidance, maintenance therapy, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, User-Computer Interface, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review