The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 45 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Virtual reality compared with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A three-arm randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Background: People with social anxiety disorder (SAD) fear social interactions and may be reluctant to seek treatments involving exposure to social situations. Social exposure conducted in virtual reality (VR), embedded in individual cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT), could be an answer. Aims: To show that conducting VR exposure in CBT for SAD is effective and is more practical for therapists than conducting exposure in vivo. Method: Participants were randomly assigned to either VR exposure ( n = 17), in vivo exposure ( n = 22) or waiting list ( n = 20). Participants in the active arms received individual CBT for 14 weekly sessions and outcome was assessed with questionnaires and a behaviour avoidance test. (Trial registration number ISRCTN99747069.) Results: Improvements were found on the primary (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and all five secondary outcome measures in both CBT groups compared with the waiting list. Conducting exposure in VR was more effective at post-treatment than in vivo on the primary outcome measure and on one secondary measure. Improvements were maintained at the 6-month follow-up. VR was significantly more practical for therapists than in vivo exposure. Conclusions: Using VR can be advantageous over standard CBT as a potential solution for treatment avoidance and as an efficient, cost-effective and practical medium of exposure.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
37 Not checked yet · 16 Own result · 14 Own method · 14 Own interpretation · 5 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The superiority of in virtuo exposure that we observed on some of the measures has not been found in these previous studies on SAD 21,23,24”
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [21] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background and Methods (page unavailable) describe an epidemiological survey of social phobia, not exposure-treatment trials. A search for in virtuo or virtual-reality exposure and comparisons with earlier trials found no passage addressing whether those trials observed an advantage on any measures. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [23] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Abstract says in virtuo exposure is effective for social anxiety, but it does not compare its outcomes with other exposure methods in earlier SAD trials. Its Results and Discussion concern anxiety induced by a contaminated virtual environment in people with OCD. Searches for SAD trials and comparative superiority found no passage addressing whether those trials observed an advantage on particular measures. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Improvements were maintained at the 6-month follow-up.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The time6 conditions interactions and contrasts revealed that CBT with in virtuo exposure was more effective at follow-up on the LSAS-SR only (Fig. 2).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“VR was significantly more practical for therapists than in vivo exposure.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while treatment credibility was not a significant predictor.”
plainn = 59- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The difference between both active conditions did not approach statistical significance (w 2 (1) = 0.33, not significant).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“working alliance was a strong and significant predictor of change in LSAS-SR in the CBT with in virtuo exposure condition (t = 72.52,P50.05, sr = 70.52)”
boostedcorrelationaln = 17 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All gains were maintained at the 6-month follow-up.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were no statistical differences in the attrition rate between the two groups (Fisher's exact test P = 0.67).”
plainn = 59- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the case of SAD, CBT with in virtuo exposure could offer several advantages compared with traditional CBT. 14”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
- Probably not a substantial claim. 39
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As regards the 6-month follow-up analyses, there was a significant time effect across all outcomes from pre-treatment to follow-up, and no significant change between post-treatment and follow-up (Table 4).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Planned contrasts revealed significantly decreased scores in the active treatment conditions compared with the waiting list, and no differences between CBT conditions across all outcomes except the LSAS-SR and the SPS, where CBT with in virtuo exposure was more effective than CBT with in vivo exposure.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conducting exposure in VR was more effective at post-treatment than in vivo on the primary outcome measure and on one secondary measure.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses with the waiting-list condition revealed statistically significant effects of time and time6condition interaction across all outcome measures (Table 3).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Improvements were found on the primary (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and all five secondary outcome measures in both CBT groups compared with the waiting list.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“How practical and effortless it was for therapists conducting the exposure, as measured with the SWEAT, was rated at 15. 24”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“the success rates were much higher and consistent with other studies on SAD than those found by Kampmann et al. 24”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reliable change from pre-to post-treatment was observed in 76.5% (n = 13/17) of participants who had received CBT with in virtuo exposure, 68.3% (n = 15/22) who had received CBT with in vivo exposure, and 30.0%(n = 6/20) in the waiting-list condition (w 2 (2) = 9.78, P50.01).”
plainn = 13- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At post-treatment, VR was more effective than traditional exposure on the main outcome measure (LSAS-SR) and one of the five secondary outcome measures (SPS, a global assessment of social anxiety).The latter difference did not reach the corrected significance level at follow-up.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“VR was neither more nor less effective than traditional exposure on the behavioural measure and on the measures of fear of social interactions, fear of negative evaluation and depressive mood.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results on the SWEAT are now providing this information.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The success rate in terms of reliable change index was high and similar in both active treatment conditions.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, results on the SWEAT revealed that conducting exposure was simpler in VR, making it possible to exploit the exposure experiences more.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, psychotherapy itself can be perceived as highly frightening or a threat to their need for privacy. 6”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The trial was registered with ISRCTN: 99747069.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Treatment standardisation was maximised using treatment manuals 44 and treatment fidelity was maximised through weekly supervisions from the principal investigator.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Adherence to research protocols was also assessed by independent raters who reviewed videos of therapy sessions based on a grid used in previous CBT studies. 45”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared with phobias, using VR with SAD requires a larger range of scenarios, cues eliciting social fears and virtual environments.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Therapists also have the possibility of varying the context of immersion (for example shops, restaurants) without ever leaving the office, allowing for complete confidentiality and maximising the generalisation of inhibitory learning. 15”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in vivo exposure exercises (for example asking for the time on the street, browsing in a shop) raise the same issues regarding arousal and loss of privacy as CBT in a group format and may be cumbersome for therapists”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Paradoxically, despite its frequency, severity and the existence of effective treatments, SAD remains largely undertreated. 2,3”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] source
- Not checked yetcites [3]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Patients with SAD seem to avoid healthcare services like they do other social interactions. 3,4”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3]
- Not checked yetcites [4] source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The institutional review board approved the protocol and all patients provided written informed consent after receiving a complete description of the study.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Therapy in an individual setting can be an alternative to the group format that overcomes those limits. 11”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intent-to-treat analyses based on data from all participants who completed the baseline assessment (Fig. 1) were conducted using the last-observation carried-forward for those who did not complete treatment.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Patients with SAD often wait many years while their symptoms evolve before consulting, by which time complications have already occurred. [2][3]][4]”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2][3]][4]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The use of virtual scenarios allows for controlled, manageable and reproducible social exposure.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“These technologies have been used extensively with specific phobias (such as fear of flying) but their applications now extend to more complex disorders (for example obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalised anxiety disorder). 13”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“all diagnoses were reviewed and confirmed by a second assessor”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The speech was video recorded and the patients' behaviour was evaluated using the Social Performance Rating Scale (SPRS) 32 by three independent assessors, masked to hypotheses and treatment conditions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using VR can be advantageous over standard CBT as a potential solution for treatment avoidance and as an efficient, cost-effective and practical medium of exposure.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These drawbacks of standard CBT can be overcome with an alternative medium of exposure: virtual reality (VR) or in virtuo exposure”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They feel ashamed of their symptoms and fear discussing them with others, including healthcare professionals. 5”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The consensus in the field of psychotherapy calls for cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) either in an individual or group format. 9,10”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9]
- Not checked yetcites [10] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Because of the need to manage a whole group of people, treatment may be less individualised and exposure difficult to handle for the therapist.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11]
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When planning the study, a power analysis was conducted using effect sizes from previous studies. 11,18,23”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11]
- Not checked yetcites [18]
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: In vivo exposure is the gold-standard condition for cognitive-behavioural therapy in social anxiety disorder.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random assignments were generated with a random numbers table prior to recruitment.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The primary outcome was identified before the study began as the total score on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self Reported version (LSAS-SR)”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“There are effective treatments for SAD that rely on medication or psychotherapy. [7][8]8][9]”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7][8]8][9]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Paired t-tests were conducted for each session and none suggested a significant increase in SSQ scores (statistics not reported, all P40.2).”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Assignments were concealed until the first therapy session began.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CBT with in virtuo exposure followed the same methodology as CBT with in vivo exposure, with the only difference that it exclusively used VR immersion to conduct exposure (i.e.no in vivo exposure).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Participants in the in virtuo condition complied with the instruction not to engage in any in vivo exposure.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results confirmed both hypotheses: conducting CBT with in virtuo exposure was effective and more practical for therapists than CBT with in vivo exposure.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: In vivo exposure is the gold-standard condition for cognitive-behavioural therapy in social anxiety disorder.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Behavioural assessments were chosen instead and support results found with self-reports.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Limiting exposure to talking to virtual characters and the absence of a cognitive component that facilitates how exposure is mentally processed by patients may explain why in virtuo exposure was less effective than in other published trials.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Patients improved significantly with treatment and improvements were maintained after 1 year.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“New virtual environments can now depict more complicated social interactions 15 and rely on virtual characters with promising artificial intelligence. 24”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because conducting exposure in VR is less cumbersome and rapidly becoming more affordable, there should be an increase in acceptance of this technology.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Virtual reality is rapidly becoming more affordable.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One important contribution of this study is the use of a measure assessing the burden, challenges and costs of conducting exposure.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The absence of direct support from the therapist might have had a negative impact on the therapeutic alliance and thus might have reduced the efficacy of in virtuo exposure.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Previous studies have shown that giving a speech in front of a virtual audience can elicit distress and physiological arousal in patients with SAD. 17”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Numerous studies have also shown the efficacy of in virtuo exposure for treating fear about public speaking. [18][19]9][20]”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18][19]9][20]
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, the importance of the therapeutic alliance in predicting outcome highlights the importance of the therapists in conducting exposure.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Furthermore, the quality of the working alliance was not different in the two treatment conditions. 22”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Results revealed that participants in both treatment conditions improved from pre-to postassessment on social anxiety, avoidance, speech duration during a behavioural assessment task, perceived stress, and avoidant personality disorder related beliefs when compared with the waiting-list control group. 24”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, conducting an RCT with all stimuli perfectly matched between conditions would increase the validity of the trial.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the lack of clinical evaluations by independent assessors masked to the study raises the potential issues of the objectivity of clinical assessments using questionnaires.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These results support what has been found with other anxiety disorders 13 and show that CBT combined with exposure in VR is an effective and efficient alternative to classical individual CBT, acutely and in the long term.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, individual exposure with VR may be more enticing to patients disinclined from social exposure or sensitive to strict confidentiality concerning their disorder.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, CBT with in vivo exposure was found superior to CBT with in virtuo exposure on multiple variables (such as social anxiety, personality disorder related beliefs).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“However, this was a study on the specific phobia of heights, the exposure scenarios were limited to three situations”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
In vivo exposure is the gold-standard condition for cognitive-behavioural therapy in social anxiety disorder.
“large with the gold-standard condition (i.e.Cohen's f of 0.4, for a total n of 78).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants in the in virtuo condition complied with the instruction not to engage in any in vivo exposure.
“Participants in the in virtuo condition were instructed not to engage in any exposure in vivo.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Group CBT is as effective as individual CBT and is widely used.
“although the group format is equally effective and widely used”
The paper relies on this without support.
Therapists may be reluctant to adopt virtual reality.
“Therapists may be reluctant to use VR”
The paper relies on this without support.
Virtual reality is rapidly becoming more affordable.
“rapidly becoming more affordable”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) with exposure in virtual reality (VR) emerges as a promising intervention for treating speaking anxiety in pediatric populations.”
From Speaking face-to-face with a virtual avatar to reduce anxiety in students who stutter: Tool development and pilot study results. (2026) · cites this paper as Bouchard et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, therapists have no control over in vivo treating context, which can elevate patient arousal and raise privacy issues (Bouchard et al., 2017; Stangier et al., 2003).”
From Speaking face-to-face with a virtual avatar to reduce anxiety in students who stutter: Tool development and pilot study results. (2026) · cites this paper as Bouchard et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The virtual reality method of treating anxiety-related disorders is effective and especially useful for tackling social anxiety.”
From Fear and Anxiety in COVID-19: Preexisting Anxiety Disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Bouchard et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While both exposure conditions were of comparable efficacy regarding most outcome measures, VRET exceeded the in vivo condition in the primary outcome measure, with significantly greater symptom reductions in patients receiving exposure in virtuo.”
From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Bouchard et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Exposure-based interventions addressing social fears can be resource-intensive and time-consuming due to the need to facilitate exposure exercises often outside the safety of a standardized, closely measured and accompanied environment (Reeves et al., 2022; Bouchard et al., 2017).”
From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Bouchard et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Apart from public speaking situations, job interviews comprised a considerable amount of exposure situations (e.g., Bouchard et al., 2017; Stefaniak et al., 2022; Kampmann et al., 2016b).”
From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Bouchard et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Virtual reality (VR) exposure in CBT holds potential as an alternative therapeutic technique for treating phobias and social anxiety in adults (Bouchard et al., 2017; Chesham et al., 2018; Horigome et al., 2020; Wechsler et al., 2019) and children (Beele et al., 2024; Man et al., 2024; Parrish et al., 2016; Wong Sarver et al., 2014).”
From Speaking face-to-face with a virtual avatar to reduce anxiety in students who stutter: Tool development and pilot study results. (2026) · cites this paper as Bouchard et al., 2017
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“as is the case of the study of Bouchard et al. (2017), in which 9 of the treatment sessions were not recorded because of technical issues.”
From Virtual reality and psychedelics for the treatment of psychiatric disease: A systematic literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Bouchard et al. (2017)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Bouchard et al. [20] is the only study presenting findings in favor of VRET condition.”
From Recent Progress in Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Phobias: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Contrary to this expectation, studies of patients treated with VRET and in vivo exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder found no significant difference between interventions as measured by the WAI [10-12].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“| Addiction | 5 (8.5) | 1 (5.9) | 2 (3.4) | 1 (5.0) | | | |”
Reported 3.4 · recomputed 9.090909
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“| White, n (%) | 55 (94.8) | 17 (100.0) | 21 (95.5) | 17 (85.0) | 5.88 | | |”
Reported 94.8 · recomputed 93.220339
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“| Low income, n (%) | 16 (21.1) | 4 (23.5) | 5 (22.7) | 7 (35.0) | 2.93 | | |”
Reported 21.1 · recomputed 27.118644
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“| Medication, n (%) | 9 (16.7) | 2 (11.8) | 3 (13.6) | 4 (20.0) | 1.58 | | |”
Reported 16.7 · recomputed 15.254237
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“| Addiction | 5 (8.5) | 1 (5.9) | 2 (3.4) | 1 (5.0) | | | |”
Reported 5 · recomputed 4
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · Cited by 20,391
Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474698565686 · Cited by 6,371
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness
Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3 · Cited by 5,457
Development and validation of the working alliance inventory
Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0167.36.2.223 · Cited by 3,520
Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.
Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027806 · Cited by 3,467 · cited 1×
“30 Potential associated depressive symptoms were also measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II).”
A cognitive model of social phobia
Adrian Wells, A. (1995) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 2,701
Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006 · Cited by 2,339 · cited 3×
“In accordance with the inhibitory learning model, 15 the focus of the exposure was to develop new, non-threatening and adaptive interpretations of feared social situations, negative evaluation, rejection, embarrassment, loss of social status or being perceived as inadequate.”
InfluentialCredibility of analogue therapy rationales
Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(72)90045-6 · Cited by 1,553 · cited 1×
“Treatment credibility 34 and working alliance 35 were measured to assess potential differences between conditions and as predictors of treatment outcome.”
Wang, P. S., Berglund, P., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Wells, K. B., & Kessler, R. C. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.603 · Cited by 1,325
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Bouchard, 2001, Exploring new dimensions in the assessment of virtual reality induced side effects, J Computer Inform Techn, 1, 20
- Bouchard, 2009, Side effects of immersions in virtual reality for anxious people, J Cyber Ther Rehabil, 2
- Tisseau, 2008, 1st Workshop on SMA in Biology at meso or macroscopic scales, Paris, July 2, 2008
- Bouchard, 2014, Advances in Virtual Reality and Anxiety Disorders.
- First, 2002, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (Research edn).
- Bouchard, 2007, Revising the factor structure of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, Ann Rev Cyberther Telemed, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Virtual Reality in the Assessment, Understanding, and Treatment of Mental Health Disorders
Freeman, D., Reeve, S., Robinson, A., Ehlers, A., Clark, D., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329171700040x · Cited by 1,428
Carl, E., Stein, A. T., Levihn-Coon, A., Pogue, J. R., Rothbaum, B., Emmelkamp, P., Asmundson, G. J. G., Carlbring, P., & Powers, M. B. (2019) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003 · Cited by 889
Penninx, B. W., Pine, D. S., Holmes, E. A., & Reif, A. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00359-7 · Cited by 740
Recent Progress in Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Phobias: A Systematic Review
Botella, C., Fernández-Álvarez, J., Guillén, V., García-Palacios, A., & Baños, R. (2017) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-017-0788-4 · Cited by 460
Application of virtual reality technology in clinical medicine.
Li, L., Yu, F., Shi, D., Shi, J., Tian, Z., Yang, J., Wang, X., & Jiang, Q. (2017) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 439
Park, M. J., Kim, D. J., Lee, U., Na, E. J., & Jeon, H. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00505 · Cited by 437
Freeman, D., Haselton, P., Freeman, J., Spanlang, B., Kishore, S., Albery, E., Denne, M., Brown, P., Slater, M., & Nickless, A. (2018) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30226-8 · Cited by 377
Birckhead, B., Khalil, C., Liu, X., Conovitz, S., Rizzo, A., Danovitch, I., Bullock, K., & Spiegel, B. (2019) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/11973 · Cited by 372
Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime?
Rizzo, A. “., & Koenig, S. T. (2017) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000405 · Cited by 372
Virtual reality therapy in mental health
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Meyerbröker, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-115923 · Cited by 363
Fodor, L. A., Coteț, C. D., Cuijpers, P., Szamoskozi, Ș., David, D., & Cristea, I. A. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28113-6 · Cited by 284
Wechsler, T. F., Kümpers, F., & Mühlberger, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01758 · Cited by 282
Virtual reality applications toward medical field
Javaid, M., & Haleem, A. (2019) · Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health · doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2019.12.010 · Cited by 272
A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs for social skill development
Howard, M. C., & Gutworth, M. B. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103707 · Cited by 234
Virtual reality in the diagnostic and therapy for mental disorders: A systematic review
Wiebe, A., Kannen, K., Selaskowski, B., Mehren, A., Thöne, A.-K., Pramme, L., Blumenthal, N., Li, M., Asché, L., Jonas, S., et al. (2022) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102213 · Cited by 223
Zhang, M., Ding, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · doi:10.20944/preprints202202.0056.v1 · Cited by 211
Virtual reality for supporting the treatment of depression and anxiety: scoping review
Baghaei, N., Chitale, V., Hlasnik, A., Stemmet, L., Liang, H.-N., & Porter, R. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/29681 · Cited by 197
Hickie, I. B., Scott, E. M., Cross, S. P., Iorfino, F., Davenport, T. A., Guastella, A. J., Naismith, S. L., Carpenter, J. S., Rohleder, C., Crouse, J. J., et al. (2019) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja2.50383 · Cited by 208
Head-mounted virtual reality and mental health: critical review of current research
Jerdan, S. W., Grindle, M., van Woerden, H. C., & Kamel Boulos, M. N. (2018) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/games.9226 · Cited by 187
Lindner, P., Miloff, A., Fagernäs, S., Andersen, J., Sigeman, M., Andersson, G., Furmark, T., & Carlbring, P. (2019) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.07.003 · Cited by 175
Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Horigome, T., Kurokawa, S., Sawada, K., Kudo, S., Shiga, K., Mimura, M., & Kishimoto, T. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003785 · Cited by 160
van Loenen, I., Scholten, W., Muntingh, A., Smit, J., & Batelaan, N. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26736 · Cited by 153
Virtual reality therapy in social anxiety disorder
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Meyerbröker, K., & Morina, N. (2020) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-020-01156-1 · Cited by 150
A meta-analytic examination of attrition in virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders
Benbow, A. A., & Anderson, P. L. (2019) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.006 · Cited by 136
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety
Chesham, R. K., Malouff, J. M., & Schutte, N. S. (2018) · Behaviour Change · doi:10.1017/bec.2018.15 · Cited by 135
Kahlon, S., Lindner, P., & Nordgreen, T. (2019) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-019-0307-y · Cited by 130
Juul, S., Gluud, C., Simonsen, S., Frandsen, F. W., Kirsch, I., & Jakobsen, J. C. (2021) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111407 · Cited by 135
Causal interactive links between presence and fear in virtual reality height exposure
Gromer, D., Reinke, M., Christner, I., & Pauli, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00141 · Cited by 127
Immersive virtual reality in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A literature review
Aida, J. T., Chau, B., & Dunn, J. (2018) · Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-172361 · Cited by 124
Kim, H., Kim, D. J., Kim, S., Chung, W. H., Park, K., Kim, J. D. K., Kim, D., Kim, M. J., Kim, K., & Jeon, H. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.614539 · Cited by 133
Immersive Virtual Reality in Health Care: Systematic Review of Technology and Disease States
Snoswell, A. J., & Snoswell, C. L. (2019) · JMIR Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.2196/15025 · Cited by 99
Brivio, E., Serino, S., Cousa, E. N., Zini, A., Riva, G., & Leo, G. D. (2020) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00453-7 · Cited by 109
Reeves, R., Elliott, A., Curran, D., Dyer, K., & Hanna, D. (2021) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102451 · Cited by 82
Decoding subjective emotional arousal from EEG during an immersive virtual reality experience
Hofmann, S., Klotzsche, F., Mariola, A., Nikulin, V. V., Villringer, A., & Gaebler, M. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64812 · Cited by 106
Pilot randomized trial of self-guided virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder
Zainal, N. H., Chan, W. W., Saxena, A. P., Taylor, C. B., & Newman, M. G. (2021) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103984 · Cited by 84
Schröder, D., Wrona, K. J., Müller, F., Heinemann, S., Fischer, F., & Dockweiler, C. (2023) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101893 · Cited by 85
Moutoussis, M., Shahar, N., Hauser, T. U., & Dolan, R. J. (2017) · Computational Psychiatry · doi:10.1162/cpsy_a_00014 · Cited by 87
A meta-analysis of cortisol reactivity to the Trier Social Stress Test in virtual environments.
Helminen, E. C., Morton, M. L., Wang, Q., & Felver, J. (2019) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104437 · Cited by 80
Deighan, M. T., Ayobi, A., & O’Kane, A. A. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581103 · Cited by 100
Geraets, C. N. W., Veling, W., Witlox, M., Staring, A. B. P., Matthijssen, S. J. M. A., & Cath, D. (2019) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465819000225 · Cited by 73
The reality of virtual reality
Schöne, B., Kisker, J., Lange, L., Gruber, T., Sylvester, S., & Osinsky, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093014 · Cited by 94
Deterioration rates in Virtual Reality Therapy: An individual patient data level meta-analysis
Fernández-Álvarez, J., Rozental, A., Carlbring, P., Colombo, D., Riva, G., Anderson, P. L., Baños, R. M., Benbow, A. A., Bouchard, S., Bretón-López, J. M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.005 · Cited by 79
Self-citationWang, T.-C., Sit, C. H.-P., Tang, T.-W., & Tsai, C.-L. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17134855 · Cited by 69
Meta-analysis of virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder
Morina, N., Kampmann, I., Emmelkamp, P., Barbui, C., & Hoppen, T. H. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721001690 · Cited by 75
Kroczek, L. O. H., Pfaller, M., Lange, B., Müller, M., & Mühlberger, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00561 · Cited by 67
Ravindran, V., Osgood, M., Sazawal, V., Solórzano, R., & Turnacioglu, S. O. (2019) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/14429 · Cited by 71
Wu, J., Sun, Y. X., Zhang, G., Zhou, Z., & Ren, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.575094 · Cited by 70
Reeves, R., Curran, D., Gleeson, A., & Hanna, D. (2022) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445521991102 · Cited by 69
“Mode of delivery can impact treatment outcomes in social anxiety, with some reports of VRET being superior to IVET (Bouchard et al., 2017) and dissimilar findings that VRET and IVET are equally efficacious (Klinger et al., 2005).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAnxiety Partially Mediates Cybersickness Symptoms in Immersive Virtual Reality Environments
Pot-Kolder, R., Veling, W., Counotte, J., & van der Gaag, M. (2018) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0082 · Cited by 72
The Impact of Virtual Reality in the Social Presence of a Virtual Agent
Guimarães, M., Prada, R., Santos, P. A., Dias, J., Jhala, A. H., & Mascarenhas, S. F. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3383652.3423879 · Cited by 67
Miloff, A., Carlbring, P., Hamilton, W., Andersson, G., Reuterskiöld, L., & Lindner, P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16660 · Cited by 60
Caponnetto, P., Triscari, S., Maglia, M. G., & Quattropani, M. C. A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182413209 · Cited by 61
Therapeutic strategies for social anxiety disorder: where are we now?
Pélissolo, A., Kassm, S. A., & Delhay, L. (2019) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/14737175.2019.1666713 · Cited by 60
Rimer, E., Husby, L. V., & Solem, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671871 · Cited by 54
“VR also affords the possibility of various scenarios and stimuli tailored to individual needs, reduced inconsistency of treatment delivery, as well as eliminating the need for real-world stimuli that might be difficult to procure and/or manipulate in a therapeutic context (Bouchard et al., 2017; Freeman et al., 2017;…”
BackgroundPerception of avatars nonverbal behaviors in virtual reality
Etienne, E., Leclercq, A., Remacle, A., Dessart, L., & Schyns, M. (2023) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21871 · Cited by 65
The Effects of Virtual Audience Size on Social Anxiety during Public Speaking
Mostajeran, F., Balci, M. B., Steinicke, F., Kühn, S., & Gallinat, J. (2020) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr46266.2020.00050 · Cited by 53
Interpersonal processes in paranoia: a systematic review
Meisel, S. F., Garety, P. A., Stahl, D. R., & Valmaggia, L. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718000491 · Cited by 56
Voinescu, A., Petrini, K., Fraser, D. S., Lazarovicz, R.-A., Papavă, I., Fodor, L. A., & David, D. (2021) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-021-00520-7 · Cited by 51
Effectiveness and User Experience of Virtual Reality for Social Anxiety Disorder: Systematic Review
Shahid, S., Kelson, J. N., & Saliba, A. J. (2023) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/48916 · Cited by 49
Helou, S., Khalil, N., Daou, M., & Helou, E. E. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231178619 · Cited by 50
Tips for effective implementation of virtual reality exposure therapy in phobias-A systematic review
Krzystanek, M., Surma, S., Stokrocka, M., Romańczyk, M., Przybyło, J., Krzystanek, N., & Borkowski, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737351 · Cited by 46
Neurophilosophical and Ethical Aspects of Virtual Reality Therapy in Neurology and Psychiatry
Kellmeyer, P. (2018) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180118000129 · Cited by 49
Technology and Mental Health: State of the Art for Assessment and Treatment
Harvey, P. D., Depp, C. A., Rizzo, A., Strauss, G. P., Spelber, D., Carpenter, L. L., Kalin, N. H., Krystal, J. H., McDonald, W. M., Nemeroff, C. B., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.21121254 · Cited by 54
Tan, Y. L., Chang, V. Y. X., Ang, W. H. D., Ang, W. W., & Lau, Y. (2024) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2024.2392195 · Cited by 53
Ospina‐Pinillos, L., Davenport, T. A., Iorfino, F., Tickell, A. M., Cross, S. P. M., Scott, E. M., & Hickie, I. B. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9966 · Cited by 43
Paul, M., Bullock, K., & Bailenson, J. (2022) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/35526 · Cited by 42
Chard, I., & van Zalk, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.842460 · Cited by 46
Hur, J., Shin, H., Jung, D., Lee, H., Lee, S., Kim, G. J., Cho, C.-Y., Choi, S., Lee, S.-M., & Cho, C. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/25731 · Cited by 44
Clinical Results Using Virtual Reality
Rizzo, A., Koenig, S. T., & Talbot, T. B. (2019) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228835.2019.1604292 · Cited by 47
Kim, H.-J., Lee, S., Jung, D., Hur, J.-W., Lee, H.-J., Lee, S., Kim, G., Cho, C., Choi, S., Lee, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/23024 · Cited by 38
Clinical Virtual Reality: Emerging Opportunities for Psychiatry
Rizzo, A., Koenig, S. T., & Talbot, T. B. (2018) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.20180011 · Cited by 45
Neural effects of a short-term virtual reality self-training program to reduce social anxiety
Kim, M.-K., Eom, H., Kwon, J. H., Kyeong, S., & Kim, J.-J. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003098 · Cited by 36
The effect of virtual reality therapy and counseling on students' public speaking anxiety
Sarpourian, F., Samad‐Soltani, T., Moulaei, K., & Bahaadinbeigy, K. (2022) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.816 · Cited by 38
A Decade in Review: A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Interventions for Emotional Disorders
Rowland, D. P., Casey, L. M., Ganapathy, A., Cassimatis, M., & Clough, B. A. (2021) · Psychosocial Intervention · doi:10.5093/pi2021a8 · Cited by 44
Lucena, F. J. H., Díaz, I. A., Reche, M. P. C., Torres, J. M. T., & Rodríguez, J. M. R. (2020) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm10010014 · Cited by 37
Virtual reality interventions for the treatment of anxiety disorders: A scoping review
Andersen, N. J., Schwartzman, D., Martinez, C., Cormier, G., & Drapeau, M. (2023) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101851 · Cited by 37
Tuerk, P. W., Schaeffer, C. M., Mcguire, J. F., Larsen, M. A., Capobianco, N. B., & Piacentini, J. C. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1092-2 · Cited by 34
Virtual Reality-Based Treatment Approaches in the Field of Substance Use Disorders
Tsamitros, N., Sebold, M., Gutwinski, S., & Beck, A. (2021) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-021-00377-5 · Cited by 37
Fear and Anxiety in COVID-19: Preexisting Anxiety Disorders
Shafran, R., Rachman, S., Whittal, M., Radomsky, A., & Coughtrey, A. (2021) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.03.003 · Cited by 33
Time to Get Personal: Individualised Virtual Reality for Mental Health
Baghaei, N., Stemmet, L., Hlasnik, A., Emanov, K., Hach, S., Naslund, J. A., Billinghurst, M., Khaliq, I., & Liang, H.-N. (2020) · Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3334480.3382932 · Cited by 34
Zimmer, P., Wu, C. C., & Domes, G. (2019) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112690 · Cited by 34
360° Videos for Immersive Mental Health Interventions: a Systematic Review
Ionescu, A., Daele, T. V., Rizzo, A., Blair, C., & Best, P. (2021) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-021-00221-7 · Cited by 43
Targeted Memory Reactivation During REM Sleep in Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder
Borghese, F., Henckaerts, P., Guy, F., Mayo, C., Delplanque, S., Schwartz, S., & Perogamvros, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.904704 · Cited by 33
Virtual Reality for Anxiety Disorders: Rethinking a Field in Expansion
Fernández‐Álvarez, J., Lernia, D. D., & Riva, G. (2020) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-32-9705-0_21 · Cited by 35
Immersive visual scripting based on VR software design patterns for experiential training
Zikas, P., Papagiannakis, G., Lydatakis, N., Kateros, S., Ntoa, S., Adami, I., & Stephanidis, C. (2020) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-020-01919-0 · Cited by 33
Chang, T. P., Hollinger, T., Dolby, T., & Sherman, J. M. (2020) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000521 · Cited by 33
Wong, K. P., Lai, C. Y. Y., & Qin, J. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.043 · Cited by 37
Designing Individualised Virtual Reality Applications for Supporting Depression: A Feasibility Study
Baghaei, N., Stemmet, L., Khaliq, I., Ahmadi, A., Halim, I., Liang, H., Xu, W., Billinghurst, M., & Porter, R. (2021) · ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS) · doi:10.1145/3459926.3464761 · Cited by 37
Physical Versus Virtual Reality–Based Calm Rooms for Psychiatric Inpatients: Quasi-Randomized Trial
Ilioudi, M., Lindner, P., Ali, L., Wallström, S., Thunström, A. O., Ioannou, M., Anving, N., Johansson, V., Hamilton, W., Falk, Ö., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42365 · Cited by 29
Cushnan, J., McCafferty, P., & Best, P. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11481-3 · Cited by 33
Kim, M., Choi, S., Moon, S., Park, H., Hwang, H., Kim, M.-K., & Seok, J. (2020) · 신경정신의학 · doi:10.4306/jknpa.2020.59.1.51 · Cited by 30
Seuling, P. D., Czernin, N. S., & Schiele, M. A. (2024) · Neuroscience Applied · doi:10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104074 · Cited by 28
“…et al., 2005; Geraets et al., 2019), public transport (Stefaniak et al., 2022; Geraets et al., 2019), stores (Bouchard et al., 2017; Klinger et al., 2005; Geraets et al., 2019), or hallways (Bouchard et al., 2017; Klinger et al., 2005) served as locations in VR for conducting the exposures.”
InfluentialScholten, W., Seldenrijk, A., Hoogendoorn, A. W., Bosman, R. C., Muntingh, A., Karyotaki, E., Andersson, G., Berger, T., Carlbring, P., Furmark, T., et al. (2023) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.1291 · Cited by 31
Self-citationChitale, V., Baghaei, N., Playne, D. P., Liang, H., Zhao, Y., Erensoy, A., & Ahmad, Y. (2022) · Games for Health Journal · doi:10.1089/g4h.2021.0227 · Cited by 28
The virtues of virtual reality in exposure therapy
Gega, L. (2017) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193300 · Cited by 28
Evaluating virtual reality technology in psychotherapy: impacts on anxiety, depression, and ADHD
Wang, P., Ai, X., Zhang, X. Q., Ma, F., Zhuang, Y., & Wang, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1480788 · Cited by 33
Zeka, F., Clemmensen, L., Valmaggia, L., Veling, W., Hjorthøj, C. R., & Glenthøj, L. B. (2024) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.13777 · Cited by 30
Effects of voluntary heart rate control on user engagement and agency in a virtual reality game
Houzangbe, S., Olivier Christmann, C., Gorisse, G., & Richir, S. (2020) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00429-7 · Cited by 27
Kitson, A., Antle, A. N., & Slovák, P. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3585088.3589381 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouchard, S., Dumoulin, S., Robillard, G., Guitard, T., Klinger, É., Forget, H., Loranger, C., & Roucaut, F. X.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bouchard, Stéphane
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 276-283
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2565451694
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 31.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs (950-10762)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (10762)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- social anxiety disorder, virtual reality exposure, in vivo exposure, cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure therapy, treatment avoidance, maintenance therapy, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Phobia, Social, Adult, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, User-Computer Interface, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
