Cited by 166Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Impact of guidance on intervention adherence in computerised interventions for mental health problems: a meta-analysis

Open access
Musiat, Peter, Johnson, Catherine, Atkinson, Melissa, Wilksch, Simon, Wade, Tracey·2022·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Web-based interventions are increasingly used for the prevention, treatment and aftercare of mental disorders. A crucial factor to the efficacy of such online programmes is adherence to the intervention content and procedure. It has been frequently suggested that adherence in web-based interventions is low and little is known about which factors influence adherence. To increase intervention uptake and completion, studies increasingly include interventions with some form of guidance. Guided interventions have been shown to have higher efficacy, however, evidence for the impact on adherence is limited and mixed. This meta-analysis explored the impact of human guidance on intervention completion in web-based mental health interventions. A total of 22 studies were included with interventions primarily targeting symptoms of depression and anxiety disorders. Results showed that guidance significantly increases the average amount of intervention completion [ g = 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18–0.40] and the proportion of intervention completers [ log odds ratio (OR) = 0.50, 95% CI 0.34–0.66] with small effects. On average, full completion rates were 12% higher in guided intervention groups. This meta-analysis demonstrated that guidance in web-based mental health interventions does increase adherence, but more research is required to better understand the specific mechanisms between guidance, adherence and outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291721004621

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. StataCorp, LLC. (2019). Stata Statistical Software. Release 16.[software]. College Station, TX. In: Stata Press. Available at: https://www.stata.com/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musiat, P., Johnson, C., Atkinson, M., Wilksch, S., & Wade, T.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Musiat, Peter
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2021-11-22
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
229-240
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W3215127018
Cited by
166
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 14
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP170100237)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
intervention adherence, online intervention, guided intervention, human guidance, intervention completion, mental health, depression, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Humans, Mental Health, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review