Cited by 121Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesStress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Neural Circuits Underlying Emotional Distress in Humans

SINHA, RAJITA, LACADIE, CHERYL, SKUDLARSKI, PAWEL, WEXLER, BRUCE E.·2004·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Difficulties in the experiences and regulation of emotional stress have been associated with the development of psychiatric and substance use disorders. This study examined neural circuits underlying emotional distress in healthy volunteers using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques. Recall of personal nontraumatic, highly stressful life events with script-driven guided imagery was used to induce moderate levels of emotional distress in eight healthy volunteers. Subjects participated in six guided imagery trials (3 separate stress and 3 separate neutral-relaxing scripts each) interspersed by rest periods in a 1.5T scanner. Results indicated significant activation in the medial prefrontal, anterior cingulate, caudate, putamen, thalamus, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and posterior cingulate regions during emotional distress relative to brain activation during neutral-relaxing imagery. These findings suggest that specific striatal-limbic-prefrontal cortical circuits are involved in the experience and regulation of emotional stress in humans. The study also provides a feasible method to study brain correlates of emotional stress processing in healthy individuals and clinical samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1314.032

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional MRI studies have shown that listening to a stressful account of one's own life, compared to listening to a neutral passage, increases the BOLD response in the medial PFC (anterior cingulate cortex), especially in the right hemisphere.

    “Functional MRI studies have shown that listening to a stressful account of one’s own life, compared to listening to a neutral passage, increases the blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) response in the medial PFC (anterior cingulate cortex), especially in the right hemisphere30.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SINHA, R., LACADIE, C., SKUDLARSKI, P., & WEXLER, B. E.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
SINHA, RAJITA
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
1032
Issue
1
Pages
254-257
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1983202231
Cited by
121
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
emotional distress, emotional stress, neural circuits, guided imagery, anterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, caudate nucleus, putamen, parahippocampal gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex, stress processing, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Emotions, Female, Humans, Limbic System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Muscle Relaxation, Nerve Net, Oxygen, Stress, Psychological, Imagery, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review