Cited by 295Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesLanguage Development and Disorders

Verbal fluency and repetition skills in healthy older Spanish-English bilinguals

Rosselli, Mónica, Ardila, Alfredo, Araujo, Katia, Weekes, Viviana A., Caracciolo, Virginia, Padilla, Mabel, Ostrosky-Solí, Feggy·2000·Applied Neuropsychology

Abstract

The influence of bilingualism on cognitive test performance in older adults has received limited attention in the neuropsychology literature. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of bilingualism on verbal fluency and repetition tests in older Hispanic bilinguals. Eighty-two right-handed participants (28 men and 54 women) with a mean age of 61.76 years (SD = 9.30; range = 50-84) and a mean educational level of 14.8 years (SD = 3.6; range 2-23) were selected. Forty-five of the participants were English monolinguals, 18 were Spanish monolinguals, and 19 were Spanish-English bilinguals. Verbal fluency was tested by electing a verbal description of a picture and by asking participants to generate words within phonemic and semantic categories. Repetition was tested using a sentence-repetition test. The bilinguals' test scores were compared to English monolinguals' and Spanish monolinguals' test scores. Results demonstrated equal performance of bilingual and monolingual participants in all tests except that of semantic verbal fluency. Bilinguals who learned English before age 12 performed significantly better on the English repetition test and produced a higher number of words in the description of a picture than the bilinguals who learned English after age 12. Variables such as task demands, language interference, linguistic mode, and level of bilingualism are addressed in the Discussion section.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324826an0701_3

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bilinguals display consistent deficits on verbal fluency measures, especially semantic fluency, even if they may answer in either language.

    “Performance on these tasks reveals systematic deficits for bilingual participants, particularly in semantic fluency conditions [33–37], even if responses can be provided in either language [38].”

    From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Araujo, K., Weekes, V. A., Caracciolo, V., Padilla, M., & Ostrosky-Solí, F.
Affiliations
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology
Published
2000-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
  • 0908-4282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4826
OpenAlex
W2038992093
Cited by
294
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
bilingualism, older adults, verbal fluency, repetition, Spanish-English bilinguals, semantic fluency, picture description, sentence imitation, age of second language acquisition, language transfer, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Multilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review