Cited by 314Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersReading and Literacy Development

Lexical access in bilinguals: effects of vocabulary size and executive control

Open access
Bialystok, Ellen, Craik, Fergus I.M., Luk, Gigi·2008·Journal of Neurolinguistics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.07.001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Rotman Research Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Bialystok, Ellen
Venue
Journal of Neurolinguistics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
522-538
ISSN
0911-6044 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970172903
Cited by
314
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurolinguistics (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
lexical access, bilinguals, vocabulary size, executive function, phonemic fluency, semantic fluency, naming, word retrieval, monolinguals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review