The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students
Abstract
Our objective has been to develop an instructional theory and corresponding curricular materials that make scientific inquiry accessible to a wide range of students, including younger and lower achieving students. We hypothesized that this could be achieved by recognizing the importance of metacognition and creating an instructional approach that develops students' metacognitive knowledge and skills through a process of scaffolded inquiry, reflection, and generalization. Toward this end, we collaborated with teachers to create a computer enhanced, middle school science curriculum that engages students in learning about and reflecting on the processes of scientific inquiry as they construct increasingly complex models of force and motion phenomena. The resulting ThinkerTools Inquiry Curriculum centers around a metacognitive model of research, called the Inquiry Cycle, and a metacognitive process, called Reflective Assessment, in which students reflect on their own and each other's inquiry. In this article, we report on instructional trials of the curriculum by teachers in urban classrooms, including a controlled comparison to determine the impact of including or not including the Reflective Assessment Process. Overall, the curriculum proved successful and students' performance improved significantly on both physics and inquiry assessments. The controlled comparison revealed that students' learning was greatly facilitated by Reflective Assessment. Furthermore, adding this metac…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on our initial analysis of several articles (Bybee et al., 2006;Justice et al., 2002;White & Frederiksen, 1998) we found that different descriptions of inquiry cycles in the research literature originating from different researchers use various terminologies to label phases that are essentially the same.”
From Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (2015) · cites this paper as White & Frederiksen, 1998
In the citing paper
“However, different variations on what is called the inquiry cycle can be found throughout the literature.”
From Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (2015) · cites this paper as White & Frederiksen, 1998
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023007005 · Cited by 2,016
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063001001 · Cited by 1,393
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Brown, A., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R. & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell &E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbookof childpsychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.
- Bmer, J. (1993). ScPlools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Campione, J. C. (1987). Metacognitive components of instructional research with problem learners. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 117-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Carey, S. (1985). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers and learners than adults? In S. Chipman, J. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Reasearch and open questions (pp. 485-517). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Chalmers, A. (1990). Science and its,fabrication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Collins A., 1994, Educational Technology, 34, S32
- 10.1016/S0364-0213(82)80005-0 · DOI
- diSessa A, 1991, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117
- 10.1037//0012-1649.14.3.268 · DOI
- Feuerstein, R., Jensen, M., Hoffman, M. &Rand, Y. (1985). Instrumental enrichment, an intervention program for structural cognitive modifiability: Theory and practice. In J. Segal, S. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. I. Relating instruction to research @p. 43-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- 10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906 · DOI · Paper page
- Frederiksen J., 1994, The Educator, 8, 2
- Gentner, D. &Stevens, A. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
- Giere, R. (1991). Understanding scient@c reasoning (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Ciunstone, R. (1990). Restructuring theory from practical experience. In B. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
- Harms, N. & Yager, R. (Eds.). (1980). What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association (ERICDocument Reproduction Service No. ED205 367)
- Horwitz, P. (1989). Interactive simulations and their implications for science teaching. In The 1988 AETS Yearbook (pp. 59-70). Auburn, AL: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
- Kuhn T., 1964, Melanges Alexandre Koyre (Vol., 2, 307
- Kuhn, T. (1970). The structureif scientllfic revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Linn M., 1993, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 47
- McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models @p. 299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Metz K., 1995, Educational Researcher, 65, 93
- Miller M., 1991, Journal for the Education of the Gifed, 14, 178
- Minstrell, J. (1982). Conceptual development research in the natural setting of the classroom. In M. Budd Rowe (Ed.), Education in the 8O'sScience (pp. 129-143). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. Resnick & L. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 129-149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- IVersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturingthe dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Aikenhead G., 1992, Science Education, 76, 559, 10.1002/sce.3730760503 · DOI
- Scardarnalia, M., Bereiter, C. & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSlLE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and clmsroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressBradford Books.
- Schoenfeld, A. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Schomer M., 1993, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 406
- Shute, V., Glaser, R. & Raghavan, K. (1989). Inference and discovery in an exploration laboratory. In P. Ackerrnan, R. Stemberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual dzferences: Advances in theory and research (pp. 279-326). New York: Freeman.
- Smith, R. (1986). The Alternative Reality Kit: An animated environment for creating interactive simulations. In Proceedings of the I986 IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Visual Languages (pp. 99-106). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
- Sorensen, R. (1992). Thought experiments. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Tinker, R. (1993). Modelling and theory building: Technology in support of students' theorizing. In D. Ferguson (Ed.), Advanced educational technologies for mathematics and science (pp. 91-1 13). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychologicalprocesses (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Wellman, H. (1984). A child's theory of mind: The development of conceptions of cognition. In S. R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 69-206). New York: Academic.
- White, B. (1981). Designing computer games to ,facilitate learning (Tech. Rep. No. AI-TR-619). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
- White B., 1994, The Educator, 8, 18
- White, B. & Honvitz, P. (1988). Computer microworlds and conceptual change: A new approach to science education. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: Newperspectives (pp. 69-80). London: Kogan Page.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 997
Pupil-Generated Questions in a Collaborative Open Inquiry
Pöntinen, S., Kärkkäinen, S., Pihlainen, K., & Räty-Záborszky, S. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9020156 · Cited by 12
Phenomenon-based learning and model-based teaching: Do they match?
Grusche, S. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1287/1/012066 · Cited by 15
Farah, N., & Ayoubi, Z. (2020) · Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health · doi:10.21891/jeseh.656872 · Cited by 22
“Findings revealed that this approach was beneficial for both low-achieving and high-achieving students who understood the nature of inquiry, acquired the habits of thought, and considered the difficult subject of Physics understandable and interesting (White & Fredericsen, 1998).”
BackgroundBergner, Y., Mund, S., Chen, O., & Payne, W. C. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09804-2 · Cited by 13
“To build on interest in dance toward meaningful quantitative literacy, we tried to imagine a scaffolded inquiry process (White and Frederiksen 1998) that students might experience.”
BackgroundReiff-Cox, R. (2020) · Science: Philosophy, history and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_6 · Cited by 13
Implementing Web-Based Scientific Inquiry in Preservice Science Methods Courses
Bodzin, A. M. (2005) · Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education · Cited by 12
The Dragon in the School's Backyard
Kidd, T. T. (2009) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/jicte.2009010107 · Cited by 12
Breckler, J. L., Teoh, C. S., & Role, K. (2011) · Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University) · Cited by 12
Teaching Science in Australia : Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study
Lokan, J., Hollingsworth, H., & Hackling, M. (2006) · ACEReSearch Repository (Australian Council for Educational Research) · Cited by 12
Lonn, S. (2009) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 12
Yang, Y., Chan, C. K. K., Zhu, G., Tong, Y., & Sun, D. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-024-09421-8 · Cited by 11
High, K. A., Antonenko, P., Damron, R. L., Stansberry, S. L., Hudson, G., Dockers, J. E., & Peterson, A. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--5520 · Cited by 11
Gravel, B., Millner, A. D., Tucker‐Raymond, E., Olivares, M. C., & Wagh, A. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00373-9 · Cited by 12
“Modeling also promotes attending to rules, iteration, and refinement with a focus on constructing coherent explanations of phenomena that drive learners’ future inquiry (Gouvea & Pass-more, 2017; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundGoals, Guidelines, and Standards for Student Scientific Investigations.
Jona, K., & Adsit, J. (2008) · Cited by 11
NASA Education: Using Inquiry in the Classroom So that Students See Learning in a Whole New Light
Loston, A. W., Steffen, P. L., & McGee, S. (2005) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-005-4418-2 · Cited by 11
“Research on inquiry teaching and learning has shown a few major findings (Kuhn et al., 2000; Metz, 2004; White and Frederiksen, 1998 ):”
ResultSocially relevant representations in interfaces for learning
Hoadley, C. P., & Kirby, J. (2004) · Cited by 11
Meta-Analyses of School and Instructional Effectiveness
Scheerens, J. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7459-8_8 · Cited by 11
Educational Psychology: Understanding Students' Thinking
Chinn, C. A. (2011) · Cited by 11
Nathan, M. J., Oliver, K., Prevost, A., Tran, N. A., & Phelps, A. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--5428 · Cited by 11
Moote, J. (2017) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9621-7 · Cited by 11
“…research has documented that the majority of them are very prescriptive and that there is a tendency among educators to rely solely on recipe science experiments using lower-level skills as opposed to less guided, open-ended, student-led investigations (Dillon 2008; White and Frederiksen 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialMoote, J. (2019) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1568533 · Cited by 11
“…of researchers who have been developing our understanding of self-regulation in science classrooms (Adey 1992; Driver 1989; Driver and Oldham 1986; White and Frederiksen 1998; Zohar 2004; Zohar and Dori 2012) through evaluating a science education inquiry-based learning activity administered by…”
BackgroundRusmana, A. N., Roshayanti, F., & Ha, M. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Science Education · doi:10.1163/23641177-bja00001 · Cited by 13
“Accordingly, the metacognitive ability becomes tremendously important as it enables students to improve their learning effectiveness (Destan & Roebers, 2015; White & Frederiksen, 1998) and will thereby escalate their performance.”
BackgroundUndergraduate Engineering Students’ Types and Quality of Knowledge Used in Synthetic Modeling
Magana, A. J., Vieira, C., Fennell, H. W., Roy, A., & Falk, M. L. (2020) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2020.1792912 · Cited by 11
Alternative Approaches to Using Modeling and Simulation Tools for Teaching Science
White, B. Y., & Schwarz, C. V. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1414-4_10 · Cited by 11
Self-citationKang, N., DeChenne, S. E., & Smith, G. (2012) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00128.x · Cited by 11
Sunal, C. S., & Sunal, D. W. (2003) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2003.10473224 · Cited by 11
Reasoning maps: a generally applicable method for characterizing hypothesis‐testing behaviour
White, B. F. (2004) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069042000243718 · Cited by 11
“Similarly, in the studies of Mynatt, et al. (1978) and White and Frederiksen (1998), the hypotheses were student-generated laws that attempted to explain the behaviour of a computer-simulated physical system.”
MethodResultSelf-citationRELAÇÕES ENTRE ARGUMENTAÇÃO E MODELAGEM NO CONTEXTO DA CIÊNCIA E DO ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS
Justi, R. (2015) · Ensaio · doi:10.1590/1983-2117201517s03 · Cited by 11
Pellegrino, J. W., & Brophy, S. P. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76898-4_14 · Cited by 15
Handheld tools that "informate" assessment of student learning in science: a requirements analysis
Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., Yarnall, L., & Tatar, D. G. (2004) · IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE) · doi:10.1109/wmte.2004.1281367 · Cited by 11
“(Barron et al., 1998; Chen et al., 2002; Petrosino, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998 ).”
BackgroundStudent–Scientist Partnerships at Work in Hawaii
Baumgartner, E., Duncan, K., & Handler, A. T. (2006) · Journal of natural resources and life sciences education · doi:10.2134/jnrlse2006.0072 · Cited by 11
Students' reasoning during computer-based scientific modeling
Sins, P. H. M. (2006) · Cited by 12
Pedro, S., & Michael, A. (2013) · Cited by 11
Engelschalt, P., Bielik, T., Krell, M., Krüger, D., & zu Belzen, A. U. (2023) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2023.2253368 · Cited by 10
“By referring to these seminal studies (Justi & van Driel, 2005; Schwarz & White, 2005; White & Frederiksen, 1998), recent frameworks for modelling competence argued that engagement in the modelling practice is guided by metaknowledge about models (MKM) and metaknowledge about the modelling process…”
BackgroundMethodYang, Y., Feng, X., Zhu, G., & Xie, K. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12915 · Cited by 10
Liu, Y., Lu, Y., Ren, S., & Zhang, D. (2024) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-024-10159-4 · Cited by 15
“This result was inconsistent with White and Frederiksen (1998), who found a positive effect of reflection on an inquiry test.”
Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Feng, X., Sun, D., & Pang, S. (2024) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-024-09398-1 · Cited by 10
“…and proficiency in planning, monitoring, and reflection (Borge et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2022; Toth et al., 2002; van Aalst & Chan, 2007; White & Frederiksen, 1998, 2005; Yang et al., 2022b), actively contributing to the inquiry and learning processes and sustaining productive…”
Rethinking how people learn: A holistic framework for effective learning design
Wang, M., & |, |. (2024) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.010 · Cited by 10
“Such kind of knowledge and skills can be referred to as learning how to learn, which are often missing in most school curricula (White & Frederiksen, 1998), but are crucial to student learning.”
BackgroundStudent Perception of Metacognitive Activities in Entry-Level Science Courses
Sandall, L., Mamo, M., Speth, C. A., Lee, D. H., & Kettler, T. A. (2014) · Natural sciences education · doi:10.4195/nse2013.06.0021 · Cited by 13
“In science education, metacognitive skills enable the learner to understand science concepts removing misconception and strategies that are barriers to acquiring new concepts (White and Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundTeacher Training during Covid-19: A Case Study of the Virtual STEM Project in Africa
Tijani, B., Madu, N., Falade, T., & Dele-Ajayi, O. (2021) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon46332.2021.9453920 · Cited by 10
“Reference [14] defined 5 Eleaming cycle model namely: Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration, and Evaluation; Reference [15] also defined 5 phases of Inquiry learning as Question, Predict, Experiment, Model, and Apply.”
MethodEveraert, G., Pauwels, I. S., Boets, P., Buysschaert, F., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2012) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.10.007 · Cited by 10
Zheng, W., Wang, L., & Yin, J. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--19356 · Cited by 10
Ibourk, A., Williams, M. C., Opperman, A., Cisterna, D., Nazar, C. R., & Xie, Y. (2018) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21470 · Cited by 10
Learning progressions and teaching sequences – old wine in new skins?
Bernholt, S., & Sevian, H. (2018) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c8rp90009d · Cited by 10
Innovative Education: A Review of the Literature
Roberts, K. D., & Owen, S. M. (2012) · Cited by 10
Tate, E. D., Ibourk, A., McElhaney, K. W., & Feng, M. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09846-4 · Cited by 10
“Some studies concluded that written scaffolds embedded in the curriculum materials can promote the learning of scientific inquiry practices (White and Frederiksen 1998).”
BackgroundSupporting Citizen Inquiry: An Investigation of Moon Rock
Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Sharples, M., Kelley, S., & Eileen Scanlon, A. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_30 · Cited by 11
“The inquiry-based learning process of proposing and conducting experiments, collecting data, and engaging in self-criticism based on one’s own data, can have positive effects on the understanding of content material and the scientific method (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
1 Student Engagement and Quality Pedagogy
Goldspink, C., Sydney, I., Winter, P., & Foster, M. (2015) · Cited by 10
Reconsidering the Use of Scoring Rubrics in Biology Instruction
Tang, X., Coffey, J. E., & Levin, D. (2015) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2015.77.9.4 · Cited by 10
“Use of Scoring Rubrics in Classroom Instruction: Support from the Literature Formative assessment literature calls for making criteria and goals explicit to students (Black & Wiliam, 1998), as well as engaging students in self and peer assessments (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
MethodThe Knowledge Building Enterprises In Science And Elementary School Science Classrooms
Metz, K. E. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_6 · Cited by 18
“... socially-distributed expertise to reduce the cognitive demands on the individual learner (Brown and Ashe, Rutherford, Nakagawa, Gordon & Campione, 1993; Resnick , 1991) explicit scaffolding of the higher-level processes of theory formation and testing (Smith, Houghton, Maclin & Hennessey, 1997) and the scaffolding…”
BackgroundIntegrating Computational Artifacts into the Multi-representational Toolkit of Physics Education
Gravel, B., & Wilkerson, M. H. (2017) · Models and modeling in science education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_3 · Cited by 10
The Interplay of Firsthand and Text-Based Investigations in Science Education
Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2000) · Cited by 10
Wijnia, L. (2014) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.32805.55521 · Cited by 12
Farris, A. V., Dickes, A., & Sengupta, P. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.06963 · Cited by 10
“This is a far cry from common uses of computational modeling in the science classroom, which has traditionally followed the grossly “linear approximation” of teaching correct concepts through guided algorithmic refinement (e.g., White & Frederiksen, 1998; Booler & van Jooligen, 2013).”
MethodSelf-regulation and collaboration in a discovery learning environment
Manlove, S., & Lazonder, A. W. (2004) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 10
Beyond diversity, equity, and inclusion: Designing spaces that empower youth
Borge, M. (2022) · International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100550 · Cited by 12
Sahin, F., & Ören, F. Ş. (2022) · Science Insights Education Frontiers · doi:10.15354/sief.22.or072 · Cited by 9
“From this perspective, it is seen that hypothetico-deductive reasoning is an essential component in the inquiry research cycle (Pedaste et al., 2015; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundDeveloping Scientific Inquiry in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments
Chan, C. K. K., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_11 · Cited by 11
Machado, A. C. T. A., & Boruchovitch, E. (2018) · Revista de Educação PUC-Campinas · doi:10.24220/2318-0870v23n3a4107 · Cited by 9
Ramnarain, U. D. (2020) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/9128 · Cited by 9
“…doing autonomous inquiry include that it stimulates an interest in science (Mupira & Ramnarain, 2018; Potvin & Hasni, 2014), leads to conceptual (White & Frederiksen, 1998), improves an understanding of the nature of science (Gaigher, Lederman, & Lederman, 2014; Kremer, Specht, Urhahne, &…”
BackgroundLearners as phenomena: Expansive inquiry as students embody water particles
Keifert, D. T., Xiao, C., Enyedy, N., & Danish, J. A. (2021) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100572 · Cited by 9
Rates, C. A., Mulvey, B. K., Chiu, J. L., & Stenger, K. (2022) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09573-2 · Cited by 9
“Research demonstrates that students who plan and reflect on their understanding can learn more from simulations (Belland et al., 2017; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundDeng, T., Hu, B. Y., Wang, X. C., Li, Y., Jiang, C., Su, Y., & LoCasale‐Crouch, J. (2022) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2022.2067428 · Cited by 9
“Unfortunately, these strategies are seldom observed in traditional math classes as they require open learning environments and student-centered instructional techniques (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundLe, N.-T., & Menzel, W. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78139-4_33 · Cited by 9
“In solving ill-defined problems, students apply their domain knowledge in a meaningful way instead of storing a chunk of concepts in a memory [22].”
BackgroundTaylor, J. A., Furtak, E. M., Kowalski, S. M., Martinez, A., Slavin, R. E., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., & Wilson, C. D. (2016) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21327 · Cited by 10
Heim, A. B., Aldor, E. R., & Holt, E. A. (2019) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2019.81.6.403 · Cited by 9
The derailing impact of content standards–an equity focused district held back by narrow mathematics
LaMar, T., Leshin, M. S., & Boaler, J. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100015 · Cited by 9
Kloser, M. J., Borko, H., Wilsey, M., & Rafanelli, S. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21712 · Cited by 11
OCDE (2005) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/9789264007420-fr · Cited by 11
Moreira, J. A., & Almeida, A. C. (2011) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 9
Espinoza, F. (2007) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.2190/1qt3-6707-6054-v042 · Cited by 9
“…inquiry” [10-12], and studies that have shown the benefits of inquiry-based instruction in improving students’ qualitative conceptual knowledge [13], opportunities for students to explore relationships, to describe phenomena, and use observational evidence have been found lacking in the United…”
BackgroundSocial Metaphorical Mapping of the Concept of Force “CHI‐KA‐RA” in Japanese
Suzuki, M. (2005) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690500206507 · Cited by 9
“White and Frederiksen (1998) collaborated with teachers to create a computerenhanced middle school science curriculum that engages students in learning about and reflecting on the processes of scientific inquiry as they construct increasingly complex models of force and motion phenomena.”
BackgroundCombining learning and assessment in assessment‐based gaming environments
Zapata‐Rivera, D., VanWinkle, W. H., Doyle, B., Buteux, A., & Bauer, M. I. (2009) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/17415650911005384 · Cited by 9
“Introduction Combining assessment and learning has been a long-sought-after goal of many researchers and educators (e.g. Black and Wiliam, 1998; Pellegrino et al., 1999; Sadler, 1989; Snow and Mandinach, 1991; White and Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundKim, H. J., & Herbert, B. (2011) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9342-z · Cited by 10
“Also, many teachers do not fully comprehend the nature of inquiry, do not sufficiently believe in the value of inquiry, and do not develop appropriate teaching approaches to engage students in an inquiry lesson (White and Frederiksen 1998).”
BackgroundDeriving better questions: creating better clinical instruction
Graffam, B. (2008) · The Clinical Teacher · doi:10.1111/j.1743-498x.2008.00212.x · Cited by 6
The Case for an Integrated Design Framework for Assessing Science Inquiry
Baxter, G. P., & Mislevy, R. J. (2004) · Cited by 9
Probing Teachers’ Lesson Planning: Promoting Metacognition
Eilam, B. (2017) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811711901309 · Cited by 10
“Prompts may be computerized (White & Frederiksen, 1998) or given on paper (Berthold et al., 2007).”
BackgroundA Simple Exercise Reveals the Way Students Think about Scientific Modeling.
Ruebush, L. E., Sulikowski, M. M., & North, S. W. (2009) · The journal of college science teaching · Cited by 9
Creating Informal Learning Environments on the World Wide Web
Wolfe, C. R. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012761891-3/50008-4 · Cited by 9
Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling
Schwarz, C. V. (1998) · Cited by 9
Integrating Evidence-Based Practices in Middle Science Reading
Kroeger, S. D., Burton, C., & Preston, C. D. (2009) · Teaching Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/004005990904100301 · Cited by 9
“When teachers avoid these complex processes, instructional content and pedagogy tend to focus on facts and description instead of cause and reason (Ward & Wandersee, 2001, 2002; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundPartnerships in the Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE)
Slotta, J. D. (2002) · doi:10.11225/jcss.9.351 · Cited by 9
Yazıcı, G., & Doğan, F. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101651 · Cited by 10
Yang, Y., Chen, L., Sun, D., Zhu, W., & Pang, S. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105602 · Cited by 9
Distributed Revisiting: an Analytic for Retention of Coherent Science Learning
Svihla, V., Wester, M. J., & Linn, M. C. (2015) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2015.22.7 · Cited by 8
Yang, Y., Feng, X., Zhu, G., & Sun, D. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2223238 · Cited by 8
“Re fl ective assessment is characterized by learners ’ agency in and responsibility for planning, monitoring, and regulating their own and the collective inquiry and learning process (Scardamalia, 2002; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Yang, Chen, et al.,2020 ).”
InfluentialWang, Y. (2024) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2024.2346250 · Cited by 8
You, J. (2010) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 8
Towards Supporting Scientific Inquiry in Computer Science Education
Schulz, S., & Niels Pinkwart, C. (2016) · Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education · doi:10.1145/2978249.2978255 · Cited by 8
“Modeling is a widespread method for SI [32] and in CS.”
MethodLei, J., Luo, P. H., Wang, Q., Shen, J., Lee, S., & Chen, Y. (2016) · Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange · doi:10.18785/jetde.0902.04 · Cited by 8
Roblin, N. P., Schunn, C. D., Bernstein, D., & McKenney, S. E. (2018) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2018.1441842 · Cited by 8
“…to result in substantially improved student outcomes, including learning gains (e.g. Cervetti, Barber, Dorph, Pearson, & Goldschmidt, 2012; Harris et al., 2015; Krajcik, McNeill, & Reiser, 2008), and improved attitudes toward science (e.g. Häussler & Hoffmann, 2002; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundHeim, A. B., & Holt, E. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200524 · Cited by 10
First Steps in Dance Data Science
Bergner, Y., Mund, S., Chen, O., & Payne, W. C. (2019) · International Conference on Movement and Computing (MOCO) · doi:10.1145/3347122.3347137 · Cited by 8
“To make data science accessible, and to facilitate a scaffolded inquiry [32] approach to learning, we examine quantitative methods based on interpretable features and simple algorithms.”
MethodRuiz-Rodriguez, F. J., & Torreglosa, J. P. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22224 · Cited by 8
“Ultimately, this process can help students establish relationships between simulated and real systems [49,64].”
BackgroundWilsey, M., Kloser, M. J., Borko, H., & Rafanelli, S. (2020) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2020.1756255 · Cited by 11
“In controlled experiments comparing students who do and do not reflect on their learning, those who engaged in self-reflection outgained other students, and low-achieving students showed the greatest gains (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundTakda, A., Jadmiko, B., & Erman, E. (2022) · Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA · doi:10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.957 · Cited by 8
“…learning science has a lot to do with knowledge and skills from one topic that is relevant to another subject (Mills et al. 2014) - Reflection is defined as the process of reflecting on anything in the learner's mind, suggesting how the learning process can be improved ( White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundThe relationship between instructional scaffolding strategies and maintained situational interest
Lange, C. H., Gorbunova, A., Шмелева, Е., & Costley, J. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2042314 · Cited by 10
“Additionally, it has been an e ff ective tool to keep learners fully engaged in the learning process throughout the entirety of the lesson (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
MethodActivity guide: an approach to scripted inquiry learning
Mulholland, P., Collins, T., Gaved, M., Wright, M., Sharples, M., Greenhalgh, C., Kerwalla, L., Eileen Scanlon, A., & Littleton, K. (2009) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 8
Issues in Inquiry-Based Science Education Seen through Dewey's Theory of Inquiry.
Won, M. (2009) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 8
Elective Self-Care Course Emphasizing Critical Reasoning Principles
Sibbald, D. (2011) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe759182 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R.
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-118
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2029930609
- Cited by
- 1,394
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 124.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- scientific inquiry, metacognition, reflective assessment, inquiry cycle, junior high school science, force and motion, modeling, scaffolding, low-achieving students, urban education, educational disadvantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review