The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students
Abstract
Our objective has been to develop an instructional theory and corresponding curricular materials that make scientific inquiry accessible to a wide range of students, including younger and lower achieving students. We hypothesized that this could be achieved by recognizing the importance of metacognition and creating an instructional approach that develops students' metacognitive knowledge and skills through a process of scaffolded inquiry, reflection, and generalization. Toward this end, we collaborated with teachers to create a computer enhanced, middle school science curriculum that engages students in learning about and reflecting on the processes of scientific inquiry as they construct increasingly complex models of force and motion phenomena. The resulting ThinkerTools Inquiry Curriculum centers around a metacognitive model of research, called the Inquiry Cycle, and a metacognitive process, called Reflective Assessment, in which students reflect on their own and each other's inquiry. In this article, we report on instructional trials of the curriculum by teachers in urban classrooms, including a controlled comparison to determine the impact of including or not including the Reflective Assessment Process. Overall, the curriculum proved successful and students' performance improved significantly on both physics and inquiry assessments. The controlled comparison revealed that students' learning was greatly facilitated by Reflective Assessment. Furthermore, adding this metac…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on our initial analysis of several articles (Bybee et al., 2006;Justice et al., 2002;White & Frederiksen, 1998) we found that different descriptions of inquiry cycles in the research literature originating from different researchers use various terminologies to label phases that are essentially the same.”
From Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (2015) · cites this paper as White & Frederiksen, 1998
In the citing paper
“However, different variations on what is called the inquiry cycle can be found throughout the literature.”
From Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (2015) · cites this paper as White & Frederiksen, 1998
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023007005 · Cited by 2,016
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063001001 · Cited by 1,393
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Brown, A., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R. & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell &E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbookof childpsychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.
- Bmer, J. (1993). ScPlools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Campione, J. C. (1987). Metacognitive components of instructional research with problem learners. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 117-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Carey, S. (1985). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers and learners than adults? In S. Chipman, J. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Reasearch and open questions (pp. 485-517). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Chalmers, A. (1990). Science and its,fabrication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Collins A., 1994, Educational Technology, 34, S32
- 10.1016/S0364-0213(82)80005-0 · DOI
- diSessa A, 1991, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117
- 10.1037//0012-1649.14.3.268 · DOI
- Feuerstein, R., Jensen, M., Hoffman, M. &Rand, Y. (1985). Instrumental enrichment, an intervention program for structural cognitive modifiability: Theory and practice. In J. Segal, S. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. I. Relating instruction to research @p. 43-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- 10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906 · DOI · Paper page
- Frederiksen J., 1994, The Educator, 8, 2
- Gentner, D. &Stevens, A. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
- Giere, R. (1991). Understanding scient@c reasoning (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Ciunstone, R. (1990). Restructuring theory from practical experience. In B. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
- Harms, N. & Yager, R. (Eds.). (1980). What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association (ERICDocument Reproduction Service No. ED205 367)
- Horwitz, P. (1989). Interactive simulations and their implications for science teaching. In The 1988 AETS Yearbook (pp. 59-70). Auburn, AL: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
- Kuhn T., 1964, Melanges Alexandre Koyre (Vol., 2, 307
- Kuhn, T. (1970). The structureif scientllfic revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Linn M., 1993, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 47
- McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models @p. 299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Metz K., 1995, Educational Researcher, 65, 93
- Miller M., 1991, Journal for the Education of the Gifed, 14, 178
- Minstrell, J. (1982). Conceptual development research in the natural setting of the classroom. In M. Budd Rowe (Ed.), Education in the 8O'sScience (pp. 129-143). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. Resnick & L. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 129-149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- IVersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturingthe dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Aikenhead G., 1992, Science Education, 76, 559, 10.1002/sce.3730760503 · DOI
- Scardarnalia, M., Bereiter, C. & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSlLE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and clmsroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressBradford Books.
- Schoenfeld, A. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Schomer M., 1993, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 406
- Shute, V., Glaser, R. & Raghavan, K. (1989). Inference and discovery in an exploration laboratory. In P. Ackerrnan, R. Stemberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual dzferences: Advances in theory and research (pp. 279-326). New York: Freeman.
- Smith, R. (1986). The Alternative Reality Kit: An animated environment for creating interactive simulations. In Proceedings of the I986 IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Visual Languages (pp. 99-106). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
- Sorensen, R. (1992). Thought experiments. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Tinker, R. (1993). Modelling and theory building: Technology in support of students' theorizing. In D. Ferguson (Ed.), Advanced educational technologies for mathematics and science (pp. 91-1 13). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychologicalprocesses (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Wellman, H. (1984). A child's theory of mind: The development of conceptions of cognition. In S. R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 69-206). New York: Academic.
- White, B. (1981). Designing computer games to ,facilitate learning (Tech. Rep. No. AI-TR-619). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
- White B., 1994, The Educator, 8, 18
- White, B. & Honvitz, P. (1988). Computer microworlds and conceptual change: A new approach to science education. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: Newperspectives (pp. 69-80). London: Kogan Page.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?
Hmelo‐Silver, C. E. (2004) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/b:edpr.0000034022.16470.f3 · Cited by 5,552
Developing the theory of formative assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 · Cited by 3,301
“4 Examples of such questions in mathematics may be found in Hodgen and Wiliam (2006) and Swann (2006).”
BackgroundHMELO-SILVER, C. E., DUNCAN, R. G., & CHINN, C. A. (2007) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701263368 · Cited by 2,641
“Moreover, these approaches to learning address important goals of education that include content knowledge, epistemic practices, and soft skills such as collaboration and self-directed learning.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPhases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 · Cited by 2,119
“…Savelsbergh, & Manlove, 2005) White & Frederiksen (2005) Phases + Cycle Mathematics Question, Hypothesize, Investigate, Analyse, Model, Evaluate (White & Frederiksen, 1998) Wilhelm & Walters (2006) Phases + Cycle Mathematics Science Llewelyn’s Inquiry Model: Introducing a topic, Assessing prior…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPolicy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543072003387 · Cited by 2,127
“Take, for example, recent education standards that press teachers to help their students to understand mathematics as involving conjecture, problem solving, and justification rather than as being entirely about computation.”
BackgroundDefining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L. E., & Wilensky, U. J. (2015) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5 · Cited by 1,974
“Computational models and simulations can make scientific concepts more accessible and enhance student understanding of phenomena (Buckley et al. 2004; Klopfer 2003; Parnafes 2007; Schwarz et al. 2007; White and Frederiksen 1998; Wilensky 1997; Wilkerson-Jerde and Wilensky 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x · Cited by 1,479
“…has been incorporated into other successful programs in different subject areas, including writing and composition (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1982; Harris & Graham, 1996), and science and mathematics (Blumenfeld, Soloway, Marx, Krajcik, Guzdial, & Palincsar, 1991; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks
Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10001 · Cited by 1,433
Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543076001093 · Cited by 1,267
“When discovery learning activities were carefully planned and structured, students were led to make correct interpretations of information and produce solutions to problems presented to them (Hickey, 1997; Minstrell & Stimpson, 1996; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundSeidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307310317 · Cited by 1,271
“…useful (pedagogical content knowledge; e.g., American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993; Baumert, Blum, & Neubrand, 2004; Chi, Feltovich, & Glaser, 1981; National Research Council, 2001; OECD, 2004; Schoenfeld, 1985; Shulman, 1987; Wayne & Youngs, 2003; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
MethodWindschitl, M. (2002) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543072002131 · Cited by 1,121
“…Vosniadou & Brewer, 1989), thinking and problem solving in the various disciplinary domains (Bransford & Stein, 1984; Hiebert et al., 1996), the use of representations in learning and teaching (Latour, 1990; Suchman, 1990), and metacognition (Brown, 1980; Flavell, 1991; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundScaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work
Reiser, B. J. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2 · Cited by 1,054
“In this section, I briefly consider the challenges of learners in the discipline of science to delineate the opportunities for a software tool to help learners overcome these challenges.”
BackgroundExperimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312457206 · Cited by 1,021
A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J. S., Fretz, E. B., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E. Α., Edelson, D. C., & Soloway, E. M. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4 · Cited by 1,056
“…draws on characterizations of inquiry learning in science (Krajcik, Berger, & Czerniak, 2002; Minstrell & Van Zee, 2000; Reiser et al., 2001; White & Frederiksen, 1998), characterizations of the more general nature of scientific practice (Latour, 1990; Lemke, 1990), and core principles of…”
BackgroundDesign Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design
Edelson, D. C. (2002) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1101_4 · Cited by 1,075
“…& Schauble, 1997), software design (Bell, Davis, & Linn, 1995; Guzdial, Turns, Rappin, & Carlson, 1995; Hancock, Kaput, & Goldsmith, 1992; Jackson, Stratford, Krajcik, & Soloway, 1996; Scardamalia et al., 1992; White & Frederiksen, 1998), and professional development (Schifter, 1996; Sherin, 1998).”
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J. J., & Braaten, M. (2008) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20259 · Cited by 929
“in more organized ways and test components of their ideas (Izsak, 2000; Mellar, Bliss, Boohan, Ogborn, & Tompsett, 1994; White & Fredericksen, 1998 ).”
BackgroundChapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications
BRANSFORD, J. D., & SCHWARTZ, D. L. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x024001061 · Cited by 881
“Examples include learning in the areas of science (e.g., Lin & et. al, 1995; White & Fredrickson, 1998), mathematics (e.g., CTGV, 1994; Schoenfeld, 1985 ), computer programming (Bielaczyc, et al., 1995) and literacy (e.g., Palincsar & Brown, 1984; Pressley & Afflerbach, 1995).”
How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2000) · Cited by 872
(2013) · Cited by 834
Changing How and What Children Learn in School with Computer-Based Technologies
Roschelle, J., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. P., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000) · The Future of Children · doi:10.2307/1602690 · Cited by 830
“55 Researchers concluded that the use of the ThinkerTools software appeared to make science interesting and accessible to a wider range of students than was possible with more traditional approaches.”
MethodPuntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1 · Cited by 787
“Several software tools have been developed in the past few years to help students with these difficulties: ThinkerTools (White & Fredriksen, 1998), STAR LEGACY (Schwartz, Lin, Brophy, & Bransford, 1999), Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE; Linn, 1995), Progress Portfolio (Loh et al., 1998), BGuILE (Reiser et al.,…”
Inquiry in science education: International perspectives
Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S. B., Duschl, R. A., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok‐Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Níaz, M., Treagust, D. F., & Tuan, H. (2004) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10118 · Cited by 844
“The hallmark of the newer problem-posing (Kortland, 1996), project-based (Duschl & Gitomer, 1997; Krajcik, Czerniak, & Berger, 1998), and technology-supported (di Sessa, 2000; Linn & Hsi, 2000; White & Frederickson, 1998 ) science programs is a commitment to have students track through inquiries and investigations beg…”
BackgroundUnderstanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry
Sandoval, W. A. (2005) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20065 · Cited by 771
“…by generating data, analyzing and interpreting those data, drawing conclusions from them, communicating those conclusions, applying conclusions back to the original question, and perhaps following up on new questions that arise (e.g., Krajcik et al., 1998; NRC, 1996; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodExplanation‐driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10130 · Cited by 750
“Most formulations of scientific inquiry frame the process as starting with particular questions (e.g., NRC, 1996; Rutherford & Ahlgren, 1990; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundInternational Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education
Voogt, J. M., & Knezek, G. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9 · Cited by 719
The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school
Zimmerman, C. (2007) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001 · Cited by 749
“If the Wndings of laboratory studies are to be informative to educators, children’s metacognitive and metastrategic limitations must be recognized as inquiry tasks become incorporated into science curricula (e.g., Kolodner et al., 2003; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundExploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors
Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0 · Cited by 632
“(cells 1 and 4 in Table 1). Can we help poor students become better learners through more direct forms of metacognitive instruction (cf., Schoenfeld 1983; White and Frederiksen 1998 )? As described in the next section, we have been exploring this question in the context of Cognitive Tutors.”
BackgroundThe Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2 · Cited by 654
“Such artifacts could include models (e.g., Stewart, Hafner, Johnson, & Finkel, 1992), laws (e.g., White & Frederiksen, 1998), or arguments and explanations (Bell & Linn, 2000; Sandoval, 2003).”
Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive?
Zohar, A. E., & Dori, Y. J. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1202_1 · Cited by 631
“This view, namely that teaching for higher order thinking is important for the learning of all students in all academic tracks, is emphasized by several additional researchers (Levine, 1993; Newmann, 1990; Peterson, 1988; Pogrow, 1988, 1996; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundHARNESSING THE POWER OF GAMES IN EDUCATION
Squire, K. D., & Jenkins, H. (2003) · Cited by 603
Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J. J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21027 · Cited by 652
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1 · Cited by 798
“White and Frederiksen (1998, 2000) have found that students who received the reflective prompts resulted in greater understanding of the inquiry practices.”
BackgroundInfluentialPromoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-Assessment
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405840802577544 · Cited by 558
“…Yancey, 1998), social studies (Lewbel & Hibbard, 2001), mathematics (Adams, 1998; Ross, Hogaboam-Gray, & Rol-heiser, 2002; Stallings & Tascione, 1996), science (Duffrin, Dawes, Hanson, Miyazaki, & Wolfskill, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998), and exter-nal examinations (MacDonald & Boud, 2003).”
Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.1023 · Cited by 555
“For example, the ThinkerTools Inquiry Curriculum (White & Frederiksen, 1998), incorporating rich inquiry-based instruction based on student generated questioning, experimentation with technological and real-life tools, model formulation, and metacognitive re¯ection, has shown dramatic improvements of middle school stu…”
BackgroundInfluentialImplications of Evidence‐Centered Design for Educational Testing
Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2006) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x · Cited by 550
“PADI's applications in science revolve around paradigmatic ways of thinking, such as inquiry cycles (White & Frederiksen, 1998), knowledge representation (Markman, 1999; Greeno, 1983), model-based reasoning (Stewart & Hafner, 1994), and scaffolded learning (Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989).”
BackgroundCollaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, tools, and challenges
Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690802582241 · Cited by 555
“The inquiry cycle by White and Frederiksen ( 1998 ), for example, consists of the iterated activity sequence “question—predict—experiment—model—apply”; this inquiry cycle is embedded in students’ reflective assessment activities.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialScaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE
Davis, E. A. (2000) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/095006900412293 · Cited by 531
“White and Frederiksen (1998) have shown success using prompts for reflective assessment in their mechanics curriculum for junior high school students.”
BackgroundMethodMetamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students' Understanding of Scientific Modeling
Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2302_1 · Cited by 507
“In these “computer investigations,” they would collect data about the behavior of the ThinkerTools Newtonian microworlds to help them test their hypotheses about competing principles that might govern force-and-motion phenomena (White, 1984, 1993b; White & Frederiksen, 1998; White & Horwitz, 1988).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationHow Students Understand Physics Equations
Sherin, B. L. (2001) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1904_3 · Cited by 457
“Furthermore, this view can be seen as part of a more general movement that takes models, not necessarily formulated as equations, as the targets of physics instruction (e.g., White, 1993a, 1993b; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundRelation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences
Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001 · Cited by 463
The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations
Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1401_4 · Cited by 470
“These results have a bearing on the relation between concrete and abstract thought and also on practical issues for the design of pedagogically motivated simulations.”
BackgroundTapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1201_3 · Cited by 451
“Ferrara, & Campione, 1983; Gunstone, 1992; Schoenfeld, 1983; Schoenfeld, 1992; Hammer and Elby 7 White & Frederiksen, 1998 ).”
Classification of learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature
O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585170500384529 · Cited by 472
A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2013.847261 · Cited by 436
“…on children’s performance in diverse fields such as reading, mathematics and problemsolving (e.g. Brown & Palincsar, 1984; Dignath & Büttner, 2008; Georghiades, 2004a; Haller, Child, & Walberg, 1988; Hattie, 2009; Kramarski & Mevarech, 2003; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Zohar & Ben David, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialDeveloping student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools
Stehle, S. M., & Peters‐Burton, E. E. (2019) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1 · Cited by 514
Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts
Davis, E. A. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1201_4 · Cited by 429
“Questions in text can highlight important features (Rothkopf, 1966) or promote self-assessment (White & Frederiksen, 1995, 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialBlanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20390 · Cited by 426
Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning
Brickhouse, N. W. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3 · Cited by 359
WISE design for knowledge integration
Linn, M. C., Clark, D. B., & Slotta, J. D. (2003) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10086 · Cited by 419
“…developed by earlier design teams as well as promising work on technologyenhanced learning environments by other investigators (diSessa, 1992; Edelson, Gordin, & Pea, 1999; Feurzeig & Roberts, 1999; Kafai & Resnick, 1996; Songer, Lee, & Kam, in press; Vanderbilt, 1997; White & Frederickson, 1998).”
BackgroundSpecifying computer-supported collaboration scripts
Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4 · Cited by 432
Toward Meta-cognitive Tutoring: A Model of Help Seeking with a Cognitive Tutor
Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., McLaren, B. M., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2006-16(2)02 · Cited by 428
Applying the Science of Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2010) · Cited by 399
So, H., & Kim, B. (2009) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1183 · Cited by 416
“…science, and other subject areas (e.g., Barab, Thomas, Dodge, Carteaux & Tuzun, 2005; Barak & Dori, 2005; Barron et al., 1998; Bottino & Robotti, 2007; Linn, Clark & Slotta, 2003; Roschelle, Kaput & Stroup, 2000; Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1994; van Aalst & Chan, 2007; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundKesidou, S., & Roseman, J. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10035 · Cited by 407
“…Hynd, McWhorter, Phares, & Suttles, 1994), and content-specific instructional strategies and representations that support student learning (Chinn & Brewer, 1993; Guzzeti, Snyder, Glass, & Gamas, 1993; Scott, Asoko, & Driver, 1992; Smith, Blakeslee, & Anderson, 1993; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundToward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design
Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20048 · Cited by 360
Patterns of Discourse in Two Kinds of Literature Discussion
Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. (2001) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.36.4.3 · Cited by 355
Designing technology to support reflection
Lin, X., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. (1999) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299633 · Cited by 344
On the Theoretical Breadth of Design-Based Research in Education
Bell, P. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_6 · Cited by 378
“Stevens, Wineburg, Herrenkohl & Bell, submitted ).”
BackgroundTien, L. T., Roth, V., & Kampmeier, J. A. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10038 · Cited by 321
“The peer also possesses a breadth of experience with the course and content knowledge that a current student could not and has a critical role as a more capable peer in promoting student interaction and exchange of ideas.”
BackgroundThe transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems
Goldstone, R. L., & Sakamoto, Y. (2003) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00519-4 · Cited by 328
“Third, they provide effective exposure to experimentation skills that involve a cycle of hypothesis formation, testing, evaluation, and revision (White, 1993; White & Fredericksen, 1998).”
BackgroundCultivating Model-Based Reasoning in Science Education
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833.023 · Cited by 313
A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition
Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.838920 · Cited by 306
DESIGNING FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT SOFTWARE WITH TEACHERS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CO-DESIGN PROCESS
Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1142/s1793206807000300 · Cited by 369
“…design challenge was grounded in research that has documented powerful effects of improving classroom assessment as a strategy for advancing students' understanding of and abilities for inquiry (Black & Harrison, 2001; National Research Council, 2001; Petrosino, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundSupporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality
Keselman, A. (2003) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10115 · Cited by 297
Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking
Zohar, A. E., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00007-5 · Cited by 297
“More recently, White and Frederiksen (1998, 2000) assessed the impact of a special curriculum (Thinker Tools) designed to teach physics and inquiry, based upon a metacognitive model of research.”
BackgroundInfluentialAzevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. C. (2004) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/dvwx-gm1t-6thq-5wc7 · Cited by 312
“This result challenges existing systems designed to foster students’ conceptual understanding (e.g., White & Frederiksen, 1998) since it would necessitate “expanding” system components (e.g., student model, instructional model, interface, etc.) to determine the learner student’s emerging mental…”
BackgroundMethodKaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9 · Cited by 306
The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment
Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D., & Grant, T. (2011) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20440 · Cited by 308
Use of Computer Technology to Help Students with Special Needs
Hasselbring, T. S., & Glaser, C. W. (2000) · The Future of Children · doi:10.2307/1602691 · Cited by 282
Design‐based science and real‐world problem‐solving
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J. S., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2005) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690500038165 · Cited by 297
“Metacognitive students identify and clarify those aspects of new material that may be relevant for future use (Palincsar & Brown, 1984; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundKramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003 · Cited by 318
“…by means of systematic explicit guidance to learners as they think and reflect on their tasks (Bannert, 2008; Lin, Schwartz, & Hatano, 2005; Quintana, Zhang, & Krajcik, 2005; Schraw et al., 2006; Veenman, Van Hout-Wolters, & Afflerbach, 2006; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Winters et al., 2008).”
BackgroundWittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2008) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701756420 · Cited by 277
“…umbrella called scaffolding (Lajoie, 2005; Pea, 2004)—can help learners to regulate their learning, generate inferences, or integrate new information with prior knowledge (e.g., Chi et al., 2001; Graesser, McNamara, & VanLehn, 2005; Renkl, 1997; Simons & Klein, 2007; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundDesigning metacognitive activities
Lin, X. (2001) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504926 · Cited by 286
“…is primarily laboratory based to one that also involves the creation of social support in classroom environments that foster metacognitive reflection (e.g., Brown, 1997; Brown & Campione, 1996; Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1996; Vye, Schwartz, Bransford, Barron, & Zech 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialSupporting Science Teacher Learning: The Role of Educative Curriculum Materials
Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2002) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1016569117024 · Cited by 287
“It is not enough, however, to give teachers directions on how to enact curriculum (Franke, Carpenter, Levi, & Fennema, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundLin‐Siegler, X., Ahn, J. N., Chen, J., Fang, F.-F. A., & Luna-Lucero, M. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000092 · Cited by 308
“Most educational interventions seem to help high-performing students more than low-performing students (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundTeaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills
Billing, D. (2007) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-005-5628-5 · Cited by 295
Making authentic science accessible to students
Lee, H., & Butler, N. E. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690305023 · Cited by 281
“Studies demonstrate that these various kinds of scaffolding mechanisms improve students’ conceptual understanding (White and Frederiksen 1998), reading comprehension (Palincsar and Brown 1984), and knowledge integration (Davis and Linn 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction
Linn, M. C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833.016 · Cited by 270
Triona, L. M., & Klahr, D. (2003) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2102_02 · Cited by 271
“…systems from different domains have been evaluated—including some with impressive results (e.g., Koedinger, Anderson, Hadley, & Mark, 1997; White & Frederiksen, 1998)—such assessments typically, and intentionally, confound the computer versus noncomputer comparison with a host of other…”
BackgroundQuintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5 · Cited by 263
“Similar support is also found in the Thinker Tools project (White & Frederiksen, 1998) and STAR-Legacy (Schwartz, Brophy, Lin, & Bransford, 1999).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351 · Cited by 308
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x · Cited by 248
Help Helps, But Only So Much: Research on Help Seeking with Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., Roll, I., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0089-1 · Cited by 300
“Second, a study by Stamper et al. (2011) compared versions of a tutoring system for logic proof with and without next-step hints.”
BackgroundLoyens, S. M. M., & Gijbels, D. (2008) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4 · Cited by 252
“These problems serve as a challenge to students’ reasoning or problem-solving skills and as an organizer for their learning (Voss and Post 1988; White and Frederiksen 1998).”
BackgroundLearning Theories and Education: Toward a Decade of Synergy
Bransford, J. D., Stevens, R., Schwartz, D., Meltzoff, A., Pea, R. D., Roschelle, J., Vye, N. J., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Barron, B., et al. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203874790.ch10 · Cited by 247
“Similar findings about the value of metacognitive processing have been found in science learning (e.g., White & Frederiksen, 1998; Lin & Lehman, 1999; Dufresne, Gerace, Leonard, Mestre, & Wenk, 1996; NRC, 2000; Vye et al., 1998), mathematics (Shoenfeld, 1992) and reading comprehension (e.g.,…”
ResultElectromagnetism supercharged!: learning physics with digital simulation games
Squire, K. D., Barnett, M., Grant, J. M. A., & Higginbotham, T. F. (2004) · doi:10.22318/icls2004.513 · Cited by 245
Louca, L. Τ., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2011) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.628748 · Cited by 244
“Specifically, a scientific inquiry enactment involves asking questions, generating data through systematic observation or experimentation, interpreting and evaluating data, and drawing conclusions (White and Frederiksen 1998 ).”
BackgroundTheoretical Perspectives Influencing the Use of Information Technology in Teaching and Learning
Dede, C. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_3 · Cited by 252
Fast Kids, Slow Kids, Lazy Kids: Framing the Mismatch Problem in Mathematics Teachers' Conversations
Horn, I. S. (2007) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508400709336942 · Cited by 263
“In fact, ample evidence has suggested that the metacognitive aspects of inquiry-based approaches greatly benefit all students, including those who have encountered past academic difficulties (Boaler, 1997; Boaler & Staples, in press; Schoenfeld, 2002; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Zohar & Dori, 2003).”
BackgroundEpistemic Thinking in Action: Evaluating and Integrating Online Sources
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.636495 · Cited by 267
“Studies have demonstrated that explicit instruction of metastrategic knowledge helps significantly to enhance students’ scientific inquiry strategies, especially among lower-achieving students (e.g., White & Frederiksen, 1998; Zohar & Ben David, 2008).”
BackgroundRethinking the Boundaries of Cognitive Load Theory in Complex Learning
Kalyuga, S., & Singh, A.-M. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9352-0 · Cited by 241
Nuthall, G. (2004) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.74.3.e08k1276713824u5 · Cited by 239
Assessment for Learning in the Classroom
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446250808.n2 · Cited by 241
Designing Social Infrastructure: Critical Issues in Creating Learning Environments With Technology
Bielaczyc, K. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_1 · Cited by 236
“An example of specifying elements within the practices dimension of the Social Infrastructure Framework using an implementation path approach comes from the ThinkerTools environment (White, 1993, 1995; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodHigh school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit
Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10081 · Cited by 235
“With scaffolds, students can conduct productive inquiry in these settings and learn important science ideas and investigation skills (e.g., Linn, Bell, & His, 1998 White, 1993; White & Frederiksen, 1998 ).”
BackgroundVavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P. D., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.007 · Cited by 243
“Inquiry learning is a potentially effective strategy when supported appropriately (Chinn & Malhotra 2002; White & Frederiksen 1998).”
MethodZhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H.-S. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668 · Cited by 229
Handhelds go to school: lessons learned
Tatar, D. G., Roschelle, J., Vahey, P., & Penuel, W. R. (2003) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2003.1231192 · Cited by 224
A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (2005) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_3 · Cited by 232
“…expertise is needed in developing knowledge through inquiry (Frederiksen & White, 1997; Georghiades, 2004; Hogan, 1999; Kuhn & Pearsall, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998, 2000) and is critical in transferring ones’ capabilities for learning in one domain context to learning in new domains, as…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10081 · Cited by 223
“This view, namely that teaching for higher order thinking is important for the learning of all students in all academic tracks, is also emphasized by other researchers (Levine, 1993; Newman, 1990; Peterson, 1988; Pogrow, 1988, 1996; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R.
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-118
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2029930609
- Cited by
- 1,394
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 124.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- scientific inquiry, metacognition, reflective assessment, inquiry cycle, junior high school science, force and motion, modeling, scaffolding, low-achieving students, urban education, educational disadvantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review