The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students
Abstract
Our objective has been to develop an instructional theory and corresponding curricular materials that make scientific inquiry accessible to a wide range of students, including younger and lower achieving students. We hypothesized that this could be achieved by recognizing the importance of metacognition and creating an instructional approach that develops students' metacognitive knowledge and skills through a process of scaffolded inquiry, reflection, and generalization. Toward this end, we collaborated with teachers to create a computer enhanced, middle school science curriculum that engages students in learning about and reflecting on the processes of scientific inquiry as they construct increasingly complex models of force and motion phenomena. The resulting ThinkerTools Inquiry Curriculum centers around a metacognitive model of research, called the Inquiry Cycle, and a metacognitive process, called Reflective Assessment, in which students reflect on their own and each other's inquiry. In this article, we report on instructional trials of the curriculum by teachers in urban classrooms, including a controlled comparison to determine the impact of including or not including the Reflective Assessment Process. Overall, the curriculum proved successful and students' performance improved significantly on both physics and inquiry assessments. The controlled comparison revealed that students' learning was greatly facilitated by Reflective Assessment. Furthermore, adding this metac…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on our initial analysis of several articles (Bybee et al., 2006;Justice et al., 2002;White & Frederiksen, 1998) we found that different descriptions of inquiry cycles in the research literature originating from different researchers use various terminologies to label phases that are essentially the same.”
From Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (2015) · cites this paper as White & Frederiksen, 1998
In the citing paper
“However, different variations on what is called the inquiry cycle can be found throughout the literature.”
From Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (2015) · cites this paper as White & Frederiksen, 1998
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023007005 · Cited by 2,016
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063001001 · Cited by 1,393
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Brown, A., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R. & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell &E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbookof childpsychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.
- Bmer, J. (1993). ScPlools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Campione, J. C. (1987). Metacognitive components of instructional research with problem learners. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 117-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Carey, S. (1985). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers and learners than adults? In S. Chipman, J. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Reasearch and open questions (pp. 485-517). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Chalmers, A. (1990). Science and its,fabrication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Collins A., 1994, Educational Technology, 34, S32
- 10.1016/S0364-0213(82)80005-0 · DOI
- diSessa A, 1991, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117
- 10.1037//0012-1649.14.3.268 · DOI
- Feuerstein, R., Jensen, M., Hoffman, M. &Rand, Y. (1985). Instrumental enrichment, an intervention program for structural cognitive modifiability: Theory and practice. In J. Segal, S. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. I. Relating instruction to research @p. 43-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- 10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906 · DOI · Paper page
- Frederiksen J., 1994, The Educator, 8, 2
- Gentner, D. &Stevens, A. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
- Giere, R. (1991). Understanding scient@c reasoning (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Ciunstone, R. (1990). Restructuring theory from practical experience. In B. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
- Harms, N. & Yager, R. (Eds.). (1980). What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association (ERICDocument Reproduction Service No. ED205 367)
- Horwitz, P. (1989). Interactive simulations and their implications for science teaching. In The 1988 AETS Yearbook (pp. 59-70). Auburn, AL: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
- Kuhn T., 1964, Melanges Alexandre Koyre (Vol., 2, 307
- Kuhn, T. (1970). The structureif scientllfic revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Linn M., 1993, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 47
- McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models @p. 299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Metz K., 1995, Educational Researcher, 65, 93
- Miller M., 1991, Journal for the Education of the Gifed, 14, 178
- Minstrell, J. (1982). Conceptual development research in the natural setting of the classroom. In M. Budd Rowe (Ed.), Education in the 8O'sScience (pp. 129-143). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. Resnick & L. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 129-149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- IVersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturingthe dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Aikenhead G., 1992, Science Education, 76, 559, 10.1002/sce.3730760503 · DOI
- Scardarnalia, M., Bereiter, C. & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSlLE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and clmsroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressBradford Books.
- Schoenfeld, A. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Schomer M., 1993, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 406
- Shute, V., Glaser, R. & Raghavan, K. (1989). Inference and discovery in an exploration laboratory. In P. Ackerrnan, R. Stemberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual dzferences: Advances in theory and research (pp. 279-326). New York: Freeman.
- Smith, R. (1986). The Alternative Reality Kit: An animated environment for creating interactive simulations. In Proceedings of the I986 IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Visual Languages (pp. 99-106). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
- Sorensen, R. (1992). Thought experiments. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Tinker, R. (1993). Modelling and theory building: Technology in support of students' theorizing. In D. Ferguson (Ed.), Advanced educational technologies for mathematics and science (pp. 91-1 13). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychologicalprocesses (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Wellman, H. (1984). A child's theory of mind: The development of conceptions of cognition. In S. R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 69-206). New York: Academic.
- White, B. (1981). Designing computer games to ,facilitate learning (Tech. Rep. No. AI-TR-619). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
- White B., 1994, The Educator, 8, 18
- White, B. & Honvitz, P. (1988). Computer microworlds and conceptual change: A new approach to science education. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: Newperspectives (pp. 69-80). London: Kogan Page.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 997
Enacting reform‐based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms
Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20055 · Cited by 233
“Although materials are created to initiate changes on a large scale, directions alone are not sufficient for most teachers to implement effective practices (Anderson, 1995; Franke, Carpenter, Levi, & Fennema, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundA model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy
Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. A. (2008) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-008-9042-7 · Cited by 245
“Even more encouraging is that academically weak students are found to benefit from metacognitive training ( White and Frederiksen 1998 ).”
BackgroundStudent-Directed Assessment of Knowledge Building Using Electronic Portfolios
van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508400701193697 · Cited by 225
“In ThinkerTools, a microworld environment designed to foster metacognition and scientific understanding ( White & Fredericksen, 1998 ), students work through the inquiry cycles required for developing increasingly complex conceptual models in science.”
BackgroundAssessment in Game-Based Learning
Ifenthaler, D., Ge, X., & Eseryel, D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4 · Cited by 232
Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends
Linn, M. C. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690305017 · Cited by 234
“Modeling and simulation tools can also make scientific ideas, scientific research, and students’ thinking about those ideas visible (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialScientific Inquiry and Nature of Science
Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1 · Cited by 216
Learners' epistemic criteria for good scientific models
Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20415 · Cited by 215
“Other research explores scaffolds that support understanding of an inquiry cycle for modeling (e.g., Schwarz & White, 2005; Schwarz et al., 2009) and meta-awareness of core reasoning processes (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRuiz‐Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2006.9652991 · Cited by 214
“…from direct observation in multiple classrooms, as well as from literature on scientific inquiry (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993; Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000; Ebenezer & Haggerty, 1999; NRC, 1996, 2001; Stipek, Salmon, & Givvin, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundMultimedia Learning in Games, Simulations, and Microworlds
Rieber, L. P. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.034 · Cited by 210
Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria
Duschl, R. A. (2007) · Science & technology education library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_8 · Cited by 205
Effects of Autonomy-Supportive Teaching on Student Learning and Motivation
Furtak, E. M., & Kunter, M. (2012) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2011.573019 · Cited by 225
“Experimental and quasi-experimental studies have indicated that learning environments designed after these principles have the potential to foster students’ engagement, resulting in better learning results and favorable motivational development (eg, Hardy et al, 2006 ; Hickey, Moore, & Pellegrino, 2001 ; Schroeder, Sc…”
BackgroundScaffolding Deep Comprehension Strategies Through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_4 · Cited by 285
“(Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000; Collins, 1988; White & Frederiksen, 1998 ).”
Thuneberg, H., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003 · Cited by 251
Motivational Influences on Transfer
Pugh, K. J., & Bergin, D. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_2 · Cited by 207
“…and effective metacognition (Blanton, Moorman, Hayes, & Warner, 1997; Herrnstein, Nickerson, Sánchez, & Swets, 1986; Kolodner, Gray, & Fasse, 2003; Mayer et al., 1997; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Williams, Blythe, White, Gardner, & Sternberg, 2002; Williams, Papierno, Makel, & Ceci, 2004).”
Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution
Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21028 · Cited by 197
“This strategy has proven highly useful in designing assessments of mathematics and physics (e.g., Hunt & Minstrell, 1994; Marshall, 1995; White & Frederiksen, 1998), but it has never been applied to improve the validity of evolution assessment instruments.”
MethodPictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game.
Mayer, R. E., Mautone, P. D., & Prothero, W. A. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.171 · Cited by 197
Wu, H., & Hsieh, C. (2006) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690600621035 · Cited by 197
“Although studies on inquiry learning have recognized the importance of developing students’ inquiry skills (eg, White & Frederiksen, 1998 ), they provided little guidance about what inquiry skills are needed for explanatory activities and how students’ inquiry skills evolve over time.”
BackgroundInfluentialIssues in computer supported inquiry learning in science
van Joolingen, W., de Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00216.x · Cited by 190
“Second order effects for supported discovery learning have been observed in a number of studies, as mentioned above (White & Frederiksen 1998; Hickey et al. 2003; Ketelhut et al. 2006) as well as in Swaak and de Jong (2001), who found an effect of specific assignments on the development of…”
BackgroundResult(2010) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851-12 · Cited by 190
“Research on the effects of student self-assessment covers a wide range of content areas including social studies (Lewbel & Hibbard, 2001), science (Duffrin, Dawes, Hanson, Miyazaki, & Wolfskill, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998), and external examinations (MacDonald & Boud, 2003).”
BackgroundWijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. M., & Derous, E. (2010) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.003 · Cited by 212
Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten
Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P. Y., & Patrick, H. (2008) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20275 · Cited by 195
“Many researchers have urged the adoption of more authentic inquiry-based pedagogies to enhanced science learning (Chinn & Malhotra, 2001; Singer, Marx, Krajcik, & Chambers, 2000; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodSato, M., Wei, R. C., & Darling‐Hammond, L. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831208316955 · Cited by 183
“…activities geared toward allowing the student to make sense of new concepts through talk or writing, which allow the teacher to gather information on student understanding to guide his or her next steps (Palincsar & Brown, 1984; Scardamalia, Bereiter, & Steinbach, 1984; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundHow do technology‐enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning?
Lee, H., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20304 · Cited by 189
Clark, D. B., Nelson, B. C., Chang, H., Martinez-Garza, M. M., Slack, K., & D’Angelo, C. M. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.007 · Cited by 192
Learning Electricity with NIELS: Thinking with Electrons and Thinking in Levels
Sengupta, P., & Wilensky, U. J. (2009) · International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-009-9144-z · Cited by 175
“We find our current work synergistic with that of White and her colleagues (Frederiksen et al. 1999; White and Frederiksen 1998), who, in their earlier research on learning basic electricity, found that providing explanations of current flow in terms of the behavior of electrically charged…”
ResultExplicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations
Zohar, A. E., & David, A. B. (2008) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9019-4 · Cited by 189
“Control of variables thinking strategy”
BackgroundAssessment, Technology, and Change
Clarke‐Midura, J., & Dede, C. (2010) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782553 · Cited by 177
“According to White and colleagues, scientific inquiry is an active process comprised of four primary components: (a) theorizing, (b) questioning and hypothesizing, (c) investigating, and (d) analyzing and synthesizing (White & Frederiksen, 1998; White, Frederiksen, & Collins, in preparation).”
BackgroundSchwarz, C. V. (2009) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20324 · Cited by 173
“Those tools included ThinkerToolsTM (force-and-motion: White & Frederiksen, 1998), Model-itTM (general relation-based: Spitulnik, Ktajcik, & Soloway, 1999), Archimedes & BeyondTM (matter: Smith, Snir, & Raz, 2002), Models of MatterTM (matter: Smith, Snir, & Grosslight, 1992), and MARSTM (matter:…”
BackgroundTurpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2009) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.5.020101 · Cited by 177
Exploring Computer Science: A Case Study of School Reform
Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/1993069.1993076 · Cited by 172
“For example, research studies in urban and suburban areas have shown that middle school students who learned physics in an inquiry-based setting outperformed their high school counterparts who were taught with more conventional methods [White and Fredrickson 1997; White and Frederiksen 1998].”
Kollöffel, B., & de Jong, T. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20022 · Cited by 171
“Eventually, this process of testing mental models on the basis of empirical observations can help students bring their mental models in line with the real phenomena (Papadouris & Constantinou, 2009; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundSimulations for STEM learning: Systematic review and meta-analysis
D’Angelo, C. M., Rutstein, D. W., Harris, C. R., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., & Haertel, G. D. (2014) · Cited by 171
Birgili, B., Seggie, F. N., & Oğuz, E. (2021) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-021-00183-y · Cited by 207
“…also provides teachers the opportunity to select from a large pool of learning activities such as mastery learning (Bloom 1968), peer instruction (Mazur 1997), cooperative learning (White and Frederiksen 1998), role-playing (Van Ments 1999), inquirybased learning (Prince and Vigeant 2006), and 5-”
BackgroundZacharia, Z. C., Manoli, C. C., Xenofontos, N. A., de Jong, T., Pedaste, M., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9370-0 · Cited by 170
“…(see e.g., Friedler et al. 1990; Kuhn et al. 2000; Njoo and de Jong 1993; Quintana et al. 2004) that differ in level of detail but basically present the same series of phases that are often used to organize students’ learning process (see e.g., White and Frederiksen 1998; Sharples et al. 2014).”
BackgroundJohnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.025 · Cited by 180
“…be seen as an admonition to discourage discussion (including generating self-explanations) after game play, as this technique has been successfully employed by White and Frederiksen (1998) in helping students reflect on their experiences in a computer game aimed at teaching Newton’s laws of motion.”
MethodKim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20219 · Cited by 184
Schwartz, M. S., Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., & Tai, R. H. (2008) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20328 · Cited by 167
“…use of textbooks generate important questions regarding how to use textbooks effectively, a few important studies on science curricular material focus on developing an understanding of specific topics over time, such as thermodynamics (Clark & Linn, 2003) or mechanics (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundWindschitl, M., & Thompson, J. J. (2006) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312043004783 · Cited by 169
“For example, externalizing mental models via inscription or dialogue can help learners express their thinking, visualize their ideas in more organized ways, and test components of their ideas (Izsak, 2000; Mellar, Bliss, Boohan, Ogborn, & Tompsett, 1994; White & Fredericksen, 1998).”
BackgroundThe Cultural Myths and Realities of Classroom Teaching and Learning: A Personal Journey
Nuthall, G. (2005) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00498.x · Cited by 167
“There are many interpretations of what might be happening in students’ minds (e.g., White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundWhite, B. Y., Shimoda, T. A., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1999) · Cited by 163
Self-citationChang, H., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20352 · Cited by 162
“Research shows that peer evaluation such as reßective assessment helps students improve the quality of their artifacts (White & Frederiksen, 1998, 2000) and the scores of younger and lower achieving students in achievement tests (White & Frederiksen, 1998, 2000).”
BackgroundRieber, L. P., Tzeng, S.-C., & Tribble, M. K. (2004) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.008 · Cited by 161
“However, instead of reserving physics for a gifted few, many feel that technology offers the chance to change commonly held perceptions about who can or should learn physics (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundSins, P. H. M., van Joolingen, W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Hout‐Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2007) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004 · Cited by 161
“Computer-based modeling tools, thus, enable students to express and manipulate their mental representation of a phenomenon, which supports the reorganization and refinement of their conceptual understanding (e.g., Jonassen, Strobel, & Gottdenker, 2005; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Wild, 1996).”
BackgroundAcher, A., Arcà, M., & Puig, N. S. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20196 · Cited by 157
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J. J., & Braaten, M. (2008) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370000802177193 · Cited by 163
“White and Frederiksen (1998) and Schwarz and White (2005) for example, used such activities with secondary students to foster modeling capabilities around law-like relationships underlying force and motion.”
BackgroundCollins, A., & Kapur, M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139519526.008 · Cited by 168
The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low- and high-achieving students
Zohar, A. E., & Peled, B. (2008) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.001 · Cited by 164
Quellmalz, E., Timms, M., Silberglitt, M., & Buckley, B. C. (2012) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21005 · Cited by 132
“Cycles of feedback, revision, and reflection are aspects of metacognition that are critical for students to regulate their own learning (Pashler et al., 2007; White and Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundModel Based Learning and Instruction in Science
Clement, J. J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6494-4 · Cited by 154
Collins, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833.005 · Cited by 159
Effective Implementation of Metacognition
Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203876428.ch15 · Cited by 146
“sought to train students to engage in metacognitive thinking to improve their learning (e.g., White & Frederiksen, 1998 ).”
BackgroundInvestigating Elementary Students' Scientific and Historical Argumentation
Herrenkohl, L. R., & Cornelius, L. L. (2013) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.799475 · Cited by 144
“…to support productive disciplinary learning is one of many approaches that design for student engagement in disciplinary thinking and discussion (Engle & Conant, 2002; Hennessey, 2002; Hmelo-Silver, 2004; Krajcik & Blumenfeld, 2006; Martin et al., 2007; Reiser, 2004; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundT/E design based learning: assessing student critical thinking and problem solving abilities
Shanta, S., & Wells, J. G. (2020) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09608-8 · Cited by 144
Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., Wilensky, U. J., Dede, C., & Willett, J. B. (2004) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1023/b:jost.0000019636.06814.e3 · Cited by 143
“Thus, the mental model evolves through multiple recursions as it is made increasingly complex and, hopefully, more accurate (Johnson-Laird, 1983; White and Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundNordine, J., Krajcik, J. S., & Fortus, D. (2010) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20423 · Cited by 141
“Furthermore, instructional interventions seem to play a key role in developing understandings in young children that many adults never acquire (Duschl et al., 2007; Klahr & Nigam, 2004; Linn, Lee, Tinker, Husic, & Chiu, 2006; Smith, Maclin, Houghton, & Hennessey, 2000; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundWu, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20092 · Cited by 143
“This finding is supported by other studies conducted in a guided-inquiry environment (Krajcik et al., 1998; Tabak, 1999; White & Frederiksen, 1998 ).”
BackgroundResultScience Teacher Education and Professional Development in Argumentation
Zohar, A. E. (2007) · Science & technology education library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_12 · Cited by 142
Epistemology and learning: Impact on pedagogical practices and technology use in Singapore schools
Jacobson, M. J., So, H., Teo, T. P., Lee, J., Pathak, S. A., & Lossman, H. G. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.014 · Cited by 135
“…students will not benefit from learner-centered approaches, when in fact there is compelling research that indicates these students do benefit from these types of learning activities, which they also find more motivating (e.g., Chan & Lee, 2007; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Zohar & Dori, 2003).”
BackgroundFacilitating family group inquiry at science museum exhibits
Gutwill, J. P., & Allen, S. (2009) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20387 · Cited by 134
Hogan, K. (1999) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199912)36:10 · Cited by 133
How Development and Personality Influence Scientific Thought, Interest, and Achievement
Feist, G. J. (2006) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.2.163 · Cited by 133
“…exists demonstrating the effectiveness of teaching metacognitive skills in helping students to better understand mathematical and scientific concepts and, therefore, to think more scientifically (Despete, Roeyers, & Buysse, 2001; Georghiades, 2000; Glynn & Muth, 1994; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundMartin, T., Rivale, S., & Diller, K. R. (2007) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-007-9297-7 · Cited by 132
Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard
Songer, N. B., Lee, H., & McDonald, S. P. (2003) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10085 · Cited by 132
Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.006 · Cited by 147
The Influence of Teachers’ Technology Use on Instructional Practices
Rakes, G. C., Fields, V. S., & Cox, K. E. (2006) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2006.10782467 · Cited by 129
Mean What You Say: Defining and Integrating Personalized, Blended and Competency Education.
Patrick, S. K., Kennedy, K., & Powell, A. (2013) · Cited by 128
An Investigation of Software Scaffolds Supporting Modeling Practices
Fretz, E. B., Wu, H., Zhang, B., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. M. (2002) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1023/a:1022400817926 · Cited by 129
“Drawing on the studies of modeling and of scaffolds in learning tools (Jackson, 1999; Linn, 1998; Quintana, 2001; White & Frederiksen, 1998), this study investigates how the scaffolds designed into a dynamic modeling software program support the use of modeling practices by science students.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWeb‐based collaborative inquiry learning
Chang, K. ‐., Sung, Y., & Lee, C. (2003) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00006.x · Cited by 128
“56 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Keywords: Collaboration; Concept map; Inquiry learning; Process; Teachers; Undergraduate; World-wide web”
BackgroundSnir, J., Smith, C. L., & Raz, G. (2003) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10069 · Cited by 127
Agent Technologies Designed to Facilitate Interactive Knowledge Construction
Graesser, A. C., Jeon, M., & Dufty, D. F. (2008) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638530802145395 · Cited by 130
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265 · Cited by 169
Pedagogical Affordances of Multiple External Representations in Scientific Processes
Wu, H., & Puntambekar, S. (2012) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9363-7 · Cited by 131
“that have been identified in previous research and reform documents (e.g., Krajcik et al. 1998; NRC 2011; White and Frederiksen 1998): (1) Asking questions: generating questions, drawing on background knowledge, and making predictions; (2) Planning and carrying out investigations: finding information, designing invest…”
MethodTriggering and maintaining interest in early phases of interest development
Renninger, K. A., Bachrach, J. E., & Hidi, S. E. (2018) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.11.007 · Cited by 124
Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Joolingen, W. (2005) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690500206408 · Cited by 124
“Other researchers have taken a normative stance, based on expert views, leading to descriptions of the ideal modelling process (de Jong et al., 2002; Hestenes, 1987; Schecker, 1998; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundFischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hußmann, H., Pekrun, R. H., Neuhaus, B. J., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M. R., et al. (2014) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v2i2.96 · Cited by 125
Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes
Becker, S., Klein, P., Gößling, A., & Kühn, J. (2020) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350 · Cited by 167
Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms
OECD (2005) · doi:10.1787/9789264007413-en · Cited by 123
Evaluating metacognitive scaffolding in Guided Invention Activities
Roll, I., Holmes, N. G., Day, J., & Bonn, D. A. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9208-7 · Cited by 126
“Learning is facilitated not only by receiving feedback on one's own ideas, but also by attending to the ideas of others (White and Frederiksen 1998).”
BackgroundTHE DESIGN AND VALIDATION OF EQUIP: AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS INQUIRY-BASED INSTRUCTION
Marshall, J. C., Smart, J., & Horton, R. M. (2009) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-009-9174-y · Cited by 127
“However, a fourth construct, assessment, with five indicators emerged from the remaining indicators (see Appendix): (1) prior knowledge (Bransford et al., 2000 ;C hambers A White & Frederiksen, 1998, 2005; Wiggins & McTighe, 1998), (4) assessment type(s) (Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall, & ...”
BackgroundGobert, J. D., Sao Pedro, M. A., Baker, R. S. J. D., Toto, E., & Montalvo, O. (2012) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3554645 · Cited by 122
“Science Assistments also differs from other microworld-based discovery environments [e.g., White and Frederiksen 1998; van Joolingen and de Jong 2003; Buckley, Gobert, & Horwitz 2006; McElhaney and Linn 2008, 2010; Buckley et al. 2010; de Jong et al. 2010] in several ways.”
BackgroundWu, H., & Huang, Y. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20216 · Cited by 130
Belland, B., Glazewski, K., & Richardson, J. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9148-z · Cited by 132
“This may be because scaffolding to support students’ efforts during inquiry units has tended to be developed for and investigated with high- or average-achieving students (White and Frederiksen 1998).”
BackgroundYang, X., Zhang, M., Kong, L., Wang, Q., & Hong, J. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09877-x · Cited by 148
Designing for metacognition—applying cognitive tutor principles to the tutoring of help seeking
Roll, I., Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2007) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9010-0 · Cited by 124
“Considerable progress has been made in designing for metacognition within open learning environments, such as inquiry (Luckin and Hammerton 2002; Quintana et al. 2005; White and Frederiksen 1998), discovery (de Jong and van Joolingen 1998), and hypermedia (Azevedo 2005a) environments.”
BackgroundMethodIbáñez, M. B., Serio, Á. D., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2015.2445761 · Cited by 116
“A number of studies have been conducted to overcome these problems by assisting learners with scaffolding mechanisms [13], [17], [23], [24].”
BackgroundThe fidelity of formative assessment implementation: issues of breadth and quality
Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2015) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.990416 · Cited by 147
“More importantly, when students take ownership of their learning within shared frameworks, student learning improves (Cohen et al., 2003; White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundFostering Students' Epistemologies of Models via Authentic Model-Based Tasks
Gobert, J. D., & Pallant, A. (2004) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1023/b:jost.0000019635.70068.6f · Cited by 114
“…and Hsi, 2000; Scardamalia et al., 1989), science inquiry projects (Glaser, 1976; Champagne et al., 1980; Driver et al., 1985; Collins et al., 1991; White and Frederiksen, 1998; Linn and Hsi, 2000), and epistemology, both in general (Schommer, 1990, 1993), and epistemology of science in particular…”
BackgroundMcNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2012) · Cited by 114
Hofer, S. I., Schumacher, R., Rubin, H., & Stern, E. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000266 · Cited by 122
“Students may thereby become aware of contradictions and shortcomings of their conceptual knowledge (e.g., Mevarech & Fridkin, 2006; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Zepeda, Elizabeth, Ronevich, & Nokes-Malach, 2015).”
BackgroundCognitive Perspectives in Psychology
Winn, W. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781410609519-11 · Cited by 162
Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the Web
Lim, B. (2004) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00419.x · Cited by 112
“This inquiry process is the most important factor which characterises IBL and has been considered beneficial in augmenting meaningful learning (Brown & Campione, 1994; Collins, Brown & Holum, 1991; Cognition & Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1997; Linn & Hsi, 2000; Slotta, 2002; White & Frederickson, 1998 ).”
BackgroundAleven, V. A. W. M. M., Roll, I., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.517740 · Cited by 118
“A lasting improvement in SRL is no-toriously difficult to achieve, so the progress made in this work should be viewed positively, just like other instructional programs that have succeeded in this regard (Mevarech & Kramarski, 2003; White & Frederiksen, 1998; Zimmerman & Moylan, 2009).”
BackgroundPaving a clear path in a thick forest: a conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component
Zohar, A. E., & David, A. B. (2009) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9044-6 · Cited by 125
“This conclusion is in line with prior research in both science and mathematics education showing that metacognitive instruction was highly beneficial for low achieving students (Cardelle-Elawar 1995; Mevarech and Kramarski 1997; White and Frederiksen 1998, 2000; Mevarech 1999; Kramarski et al. 2002; Teong 2003; Mevare…”
ResultTechnology-Mediation and Tutoring: How Do They Shape Progressive Inquiry Discourse?
Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1404_3 · Cited by 117
“…learning in the geosciences (Edelson, Gordin & Pea, 1999), project-based science and laboratory work (Krajcik, Blumenfeld, Marx, Bass, Fredricks & Soloway, 1998), laws of force and motion (White & Frederiksen, 1998), and concepts of growth and development (Zuckerman, Chudinova & Khavkin, 1998).”
BackgroundToward Tutoring Help Seeking; Applying Cognitive Modeling to Meta-Cognitive Skills
Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., McLaren, B. M., Roll, O., & Koedinger, K. R. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6470579 · Cited by 112
Learning to monitor and regulate collective thinking processes
Borge, M., Ong, Y. S., & Rosé, C. P. (2018) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9270-5 · Cited by 127
“Drawing on examples of reflective-assessments (White & Frederiksen, 1998), we specified levels of sophistication from one-to-five, with different descriptions of communication patterns for each level.”
MethodZohar, A. E. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_2 · Cited by 116
“Additional empirical studies have supported the more specific claim thatusingmetacognitionmayimprove learningofproblem-solvingandhigherorder thinking skills (Chen & Klahr, 1999; Lin & Lehman, 1999; Ross, 1988; Schoenfeld, 1992; Toth, Klahr, & Chen, 2000; White & Frederiksen, 1998, 2000).”
BackgroundDevelopment and evaluation of metacognition in early childhood education
Chatzipanteli, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Gregoriadis, A. (2013) · Early Child Development and Care · doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.861456 · Cited by 112
“Enabling students to acquire such abilities could reduce the differences in learning between younger and older children (White & Frederiksen, 1998).”
BackgroundBulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2010) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9150-9 · Cited by 108
“Some researchers have proposed metacognitive skills are domain-general, suggesting that high metacognitive skills can potentially compensate for overall aptitude and prior knowledge of learners (Swanson, 1990; 99 Veenman, Elshout, & Meijer, 1988; White & Frederiksen, 1998; 2005).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMayer, R. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.082602.133124 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R.
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-118
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2029930609
- Cited by
- 1,394
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 124.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- scientific inquiry, metacognition, reflective assessment, inquiry cycle, junior high school science, force and motion, modeling, scaffolding, low-achieving students, urban education, educational disadvantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review