The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory
Open accessAbstract
Use of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992) in adolescent samples has shown that a few respondents have difficulty with a subset of items. We identified 30 items that were not understood by at least 2% of adolescent respondents and 18 additional items with low item-total correlations, and we wrote 2 trial replacement items for each. We used self-report and observer rating data from 500 respondents aged 14 to 20 to select replacement items. The modified instrument retained the intended factor structure and showed slightly better internal consistency, cross-observer agreement, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level = 5.3). The NEO-PI-3 appears to be useful in high school and college samples and may have wider applicability to adults as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1456 · Cited by 499
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1002/per.524 · DOI · Paper page
- Andrews, F. M. & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum. · DOI · Paper page
- Baker, S. R. & Victor, J. B. (2003, August). Adolescent self-reports of personality and temperament: NEO-PI-R and TPQ. Paper presented at the 11th European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Milan, Italy.
- 10.1037//0893-164X.15.3.255 · doi:10.1037//0893-164x.15.3.255
- 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00578-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1984). Personality as a lifelong determinant of well-being. In C. Malatesta & C. Izard (Eds.), Affective processes in adult development and aging (pp. 141-157). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (2002). Looking backward: Changes in the mean levels of personality traits from 80 to 12. In D. Cervone & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 219-237). New York: Guilford.
- Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R. & Jonsson, F. H. (2002). Validity and utility of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Examples from Europe. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 61-77). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
- 10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.322 · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.322 · Paper page
- Cota A. A., 1993, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 865, 10.1177/0013164493053004001 · DOI
- De Fruyt F., 2000, Assessment, 7, 329, 10.1177/107319110000700403 · DOI · Paper page
- Haven, S. & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977). Tucker's coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study (Heymans Bulletin 290 EX). University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jrpe.2001.2341 · DOI
- McCrae R. R., 1991, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227, 10.1177/014616729101700217 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00056-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1456 · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1456 · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.552 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-6494.694157 · DOI · Paper page
- Schinka J. A., 1994, Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 95, 10.1207/s15327752jpa6201_9 · DOI
Cited by
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000626 · Cited by 1,470
Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: A proof-of-concept study
Bogenschutz, M. P., Forcehimes, A. A., Pommy, J. A., Wilcox, C. E., Barbosa, P., & Strassman, R. J. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881114565144 · Cited by 1,151
The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Evolution, Scope and Enhancements
Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1028709 · Cited by 937
Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity
McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310366253 · Cited by 874
Self-citationOur Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter
Quercia, D., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.26 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- McCrae, R. R., Costa, Jr., & Martin, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Assessment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-270
- ISSN
- 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7752
- OpenAlex
- W2079836081
- Cited by
- 700
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05
- The paper
- McCrae, R. R., Costa, Jr., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
