The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Teaching Conditions Predict Teacher Turnover in California Schools
Abstract
A number of studies have found that teachers are prone to leave schools serving high proportions of low-achieving, low-income, and minority students for more economically and educationally advantaged schools. In schools with very high turnover rates, this can pose a number of challenges, including lack of continuity in instruction, lack of adequate teaching expertise for making curriculum decisions and providing support and mentoring, and lost time and resources for replacement and training. If high rates of turnover are caused largely by student characteristics, then policy strategies to correct the problem are limited. However, due to data constraints, little research has sought to disentangle the effects of student demographic factors from occupational factors such as salaries and working conditions that may also influence turnover and are amenable to policy interventions. Using California teacher survey data linked to district data on salaries and staffing patterns, this study examines a range of school conditions as well as demographic factors and finds that high levels of school turnover are strongly affected by poor working conditions and low salaries, as well as by student characteristics. Although schools' racial compositions and proportions of low-income students predict teacher turnover, salaries and working conditions-including large class sizes, facilities problems, multitrack schools, and lack of textbooks-are strong and significant factors in predicting high rates of turnover. Furthermore, when these conditions are taken into account, the influence of student characteristics on turnover is substantially reduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038003499 · Cited by 2,989 · cited 3×
“Some analysts have argued that quit and transfer decisions are the largest component of teacher supply problems, as the lion’s share of attrition stems from nonretirement choices (Ingersoll, 2001; NCTAF, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialCooper, H., Valentine, J. C., Charlton, K., & Melson, A. (2003) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543073001001 · Cited by 138
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1016/0272-7757(82)90032-2 · DOI
- Boe E. E., 1997, The Journal of Special Education, 30, 390, 10.1177/002246699703000403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/209813 · DOI · Paper page
- Darling-Hammond L., 2003, Santa Clara University Law Review, 43, 101
- Gritz R. M., 1996, Journal of Human Resources, 31, 477, 10.2307/146262 · DOI · Paper page
- Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F. & Rivkin, S. G. (1999, April). Do higher salaries buy better teachers? (Working Paper No. 7082). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. · DOI · Paper page
- Hanushek E. A., 2004, Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326, 10.2307/3559017 · DOI · Paper page
- Heyns B., 1988, Educational Researcher, 17, 24, 10.3102/0013189X017003024 · DOI
- Kain, J. F. & Singleton, K. (1996, May/June). Equality of educational opportunity revisited. New England Economic Review, pp. 87-111.
- Lankford H., 2002, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37, 10.3102/01623737024001037 · DOI · Paper page
- Mont D., 1996, Economic Inquiry, 34, 152, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1996.tb01369.x · DOI
- Murnane R. J., 1990, The Journal of Human Resources, 25, 106, 10.2307/145729 · DOI · Paper page
- Murnane R. J., 1989, Harvard Educational Review, 59, 325, 10.17763/haer.59.3.040r1583036775um · DOI · Paper page
- Shen J., 1997, Journal of Educational Research, 91, 81, 10.1080/00220679709597525 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0272-7757(97)00023-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0272-7757(90)90005-P · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0272-7757(95)00022-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00040-2 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811211401004 · Cited by 822
A Coming Crisis in Teaching? Teacher Supply, Demand, and Shortages in the U.S.
Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016) · doi:10.54300/247.242 · Cited by 718
Self-citationThe Influence of School Administrators on Teacher Retention Decisions
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2011) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831210380788 · Cited by 710
Self-citationTeacher Turnover in High-Poverty Schools: What We Know and Can Do
Simon, N., & Johnson, S. M. (2015) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811511700305 · Cited by 554
Explaining the Short Careers of High-Achieving Teachers in Schools with Low-Performing Students
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282805774669628 · Cited by 498
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J.
- Venue
- Peabody Journal of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 44-70
- ISSN
- 0161-956X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7930
- OpenAlex
- W2014164031
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 58.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Teaching Conditions Predict Teacher Turnover in California Schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327930pje8003_4
- The paper
- Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2005). How Teaching Conditions Predict Teacher Turnover in California Schools. Peabody Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje8003_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.