The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings
Abstract
Goodness-of-fit (GOF) indexes provide "rules of thumb"—recommended cutoff values for assessing fit in structural equation modeling. Hu and Bentler (1999) proposed a more rigorous approach to evaluating decision rules based on GOF indexes and, on this basis, proposed new and more stringent cutoff values for many indexes. This article discusses potential problems underlying the hypothesis-testing rationale of their research, which is more appropriate to testing statistical significance than evaluating GOF. Many of their misspecified models resulted in a fit that should have been deemed acceptable according to even their new, more demanding criteria. Hence, rejection of these acceptable-misspecified models should have constituted a Type 1 error (incorrect rejection of an "acceptable" model), leading to the seemingly paradoxical results whereby the probability of correctly rejecting misspecified models decreased substantially with increasing N. In contrast to the application of cutoff values to evaluate each solution in isolation, all the GOF indexes were more effective at identifying differences in misspecification based on nested models. Whereas Hu and Bentler (1999) offered cautions about the use of GOF indexes, current practice seems to have incorporated their new guidelines without sufficient attention to the limitations noted by Hu and Bentler (1999).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The criterion of the model fit was RMSEA <0.08, CFI >0.90, TLI >0.90 and SRMR <0.08 (Marsh et al., 2004).”
From Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach (2024) · cites this paper as Marsh et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,933
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130 · Cited by 10,418
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,690
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330
Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third Edition
Byrne, B. M. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315757421 · Cited by 4,653
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
- 10.1037//1040-3590.12.4.371 · DOI
- 10.1037//1082-989X.3.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-843X.109.4.624 · DOI
- 10.1037//1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Ed.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- 10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.247 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,052
Sierra, J. O., Chocarro, E., Fonseca‐Pedrero, E., Riba, S. S. I., & Muñiz, J. (2015) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.05.005 · Cited by 118
Sobko, T., Jia, Z., & Brown, G. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207057 · Cited by 130
Tóth‐Király, I., Morin, A. J. S., Bőthe, B., Orosz, G., & Rigó, A. (2017) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1374867 · Cited by 121
Helton, W. S., Matthews, G., & Warm, J. S. (2009) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.12.006 · Cited by 113
Gelabert, E., Esteve, L. G., Santos, R. M., Gutiérrez, F., Torres, A., & Álvarez, S. S. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 113
Putwain, D. W., Daly, A., Chamberlain, S., & Sadreddini, S. (2015) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1066493 · Cited by 124
Hong, W., Bernacki, M. L., & Perera, H. N. (2020) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000445 · Cited by 127
What Does a Nation Owe Non-Citizens?
Raijman, R., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Hochman, O. (2008) · International Journal of Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1177/0020715208088912 · Cited by 112
Place attachment and recreation experience preference: A further exploration of the relationship
Budruk, M., & Stanis, S. A. W. (2013) · Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism · doi:10.1016/j.jort.2013.04.001 · Cited by 112
Sánchez-Oliva, D., Morin, A. J. S., Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Palmeira, A. L., & Silva, M. N. (2017) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.001 · Cited by 111
Salekin, R. T., Chen, D. R., Sellbom, M., Lester, W. S., & MacDougall, E. A. M. (2014) · Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment · doi:10.1037/per0000073 · Cited by 111
Doron, J., Trouillet, R., Gana, K., Boiché, J. C. S., Neveu, D., & Ninot, G. (2014) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2014.886255 · Cited by 111
Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., & Krumm, S. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.027 · Cited by 111
Colmar, S., Liem, G. A. D., Connor, J., & Martin, A. J. (2019) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1617409 · Cited by 113
Structural equation modeling made difficult
Millsap, R. E. (2007) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.021 · Cited by 111
Methods for Investigating Structural Equivalence
Fischer, R. D., & Fontaine, J. R. J. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511779381.010 · Cited by 110
An item response theory/confirmatory factor analysis of the Autobiographical Memory Test
Griffith, J. W., Sumner, J. A., Debeer, E., Raes, F., Hermans, D., Mineka, S., Zinbarg, R. E., & Craske, M. G. (2009) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210902939348 · Cited by 110
A New Scale for Measuring Reward Responsiveness
Ivo, V. D. B., Franken, I. H. A., & Muris, P. (2010) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00239 · Cited by 114
Leader Self and Means Efficacy: A multi-component approach
Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Chan, A. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.007 · Cited by 132
Hallit, S. R., Haddad, C., Hallit, R. R., Akel, M., Obeïd, S., Haddad, G., Soufia, M., Khansa, W., Khoury, R., Kheir, N., et al. (2020) · Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health · doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2020.03.028 · Cited by 110
Chaturvedi, P., Kulshreshtha, K., Tripathi, V., & Agnihotri, D. (2022) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration · doi:10.1108/apjba-09-2021-0456 · Cited by 110
Büyükgöze, H., Çalışkan, Ö., & Gümüş, S. (2022) · Educational Management Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/17411432221130879 · Cited by 110
Consumers' continuance intention towards metaverse-based virtual stores: A multi-study perspective
Chakraborty, D., Polisetty, A., & Rana, N. P. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123405 · Cited by 116
Pinsof, W. M., Zinbarg, R. E., Lebow, J. L., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Durbin, E., Chambers, A. L., Latta, T. A., Karam, E. A., Goldsmith, J. Z., & Friedman, G. (2009) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300802669973 · Cited by 109
Huang, J. L. W., & Ryan, A. M. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01216.x · Cited by 109
Perera, H. N., & DiGiacomo, M. L. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.001 · Cited by 122
Schnitker, S. A., Houltberg, B. J., Dyrness, W. A., & Redmond, N. M. (2017) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/rel0000099 · Cited by 117
King, K. M., Littlefield, A. K., McCabe, C. J., Mills, K. L., Flournoy, J. C., & Chassin, L. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.009 · Cited by 117
Song, J. H., Chai, D. S., Kim, J., & Bae, S. H. (2018) · Performance Improvement Quarterly · doi:10.1002/piq.21251 · Cited by 109
Luft, B. J., Schechter, C. B., Kotov, R., Broihier, J., Reissman, D. B., Guerrera, K. M., Udasin, I. G., Moline, J. M., Harrison, D. J., Friedman‐Jiménez, G., et al. (2011) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329171100256x · Cited by 113
Raineri, N., & Paillé, P. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3170-2 · Cited by 112
Lee, M., & Lee, H.-H. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106579 · Cited by 108
Cosenza, T. R., Solomon, M. R., & Kwon, W. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1496 · Cited by 115
Transformational leadership and employee turnover intention
Gyensare, M. A., Anku-Tsede, O., Sanda, M.-A., & Okpoti, C. A. (2016) · World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development · doi:10.1108/wjemsd-02-2016-0008 · Cited by 135
Comparison of perceived acquisition value sought by online second-hand and new goods shoppers
Fernando, A. G., Sivakumaran, B., & Suganthi, L. (2018) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-01-2017-0048 · Cited by 125
Kösters, M. P., Chinapaw, M. J. M., Zwaanswijk, M., van der Wal, M. F., & Koot, H. M. (2015) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0509-7 · Cited by 107
Ruggieri, S., Ingoglia, S., Bonfanti, R. C., & Lo Coco, G. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110486 · Cited by 107
Guglielmi, R. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.322 · Cited by 111
Coping With Global Environmental Problems
Homburg, A., Stolberg, A., & Wagner, U. (2007) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916506297215 · Cited by 107
Leadership in Extreme Contexts
Geier, M. T. (2016) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051815627359 · Cited by 107
Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., Maynard, M. T., & Mangos, P. M. (2009) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959280903400150 · Cited by 107
川端, 雅., & Mallett, C. J. (2011) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9221-1 · Cited by 107
Kuntsche, E. N., Rossow, I. M., Simons‐Morton, B. G., ter Bogt, T., Kokkevi, A., & Godeau, E. (2012) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01895.x · Cited by 107
Davidov, E. (2010) · International Journal of Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1177/0020715210363534 · Cited by 107
Pixels vs. Paper: Comparing Online and Traditional Survey Methods in Sport Psychology
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K. P., & Rose, E. A. (2006) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.28.1.100 · Cited by 107
Olino, T. M., Dougherty, L. R., Bufferd, S. J., Carlson, G. A., & Klein, D. N. (2014) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-014-9865-x · Cited by 106
Heissel, A., Pietrek, A., Flunger, B., Fydrich, T., Rapp, M. A., Heinzel, S., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2018) · European Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1027/2512-8442/a000017 · Cited by 106
Cieciuch, J., & Davidov, E. (2012) · Survey research methods · doi:10.18148/srm/2012.v6i1.5091 · Cited by 106
Academically buoyant students are less anxious about and perform better in high‐stakes examinations
Putwain, D. W., Daly, A., Chamberlain, S., & Sadreddini, S. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12068 · Cited by 117
Lee, S., Lee, H. J., Seo, W. J., & Green, C. (2012) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.26.6.490 · Cited by 113
The NEO Personality Inventory–Revised
Furnham, A. F., Guenole, N., Levine, S. Z., & Chamorro‐Premuzic, T. (2012) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191112448213 · Cited by 113
Meaning in life, self-control and psychological distress among adolescents: A cross-national study
Li, J., Salcuni, S., & Delvecchio, E. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.033 · Cited by 106
Measuring psychological need states in sport: Theoretical considerations and a new measure
Bhavsar, N., Bartholomew, K. J., Quested, E., Gucciardi, D. F., Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, C., Reeve, J., Sarrazin, P. G., & Ntoumanis, N. (2019) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101617 · Cited by 118
Gralewski, J., & Jankowska, D. M. (2020) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100709 · Cited by 106
Affective blocs: Understanding affective polarization in multiparty systems
Kekkonen, A., & Ylä‐Anttila, T. (2021) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102367 · Cited by 125
A tailored-fit model evaluation strategy for better decisions about structural equation models
Mai, R., Niemand, T., & Kraus, S. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121142 · Cited by 112
Veletić, J., Price, H. E., & Olsen, R. V. (2023) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-023-09413-6 · Cited by 106
Predictors of Later–Generation Family Members’ Commitment to Family Enterprises
Dawson, A., Sharma, P., Irving, P. G., Marcus, J., & Chirico, F. (2013) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12052 · Cited by 106
Petersen, S., Hägglöf, B., Stenlund, H. C., & Bergström, E. (2009) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01360.x · Cited by 106
The role of belief in occurrence within autobiographical memory.
Scoboria, A., Jackson, D. L., Talarico, J., Hanczakowski, M., Wysman, L., & Mazzoni, G. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0034110 · Cited by 105
Renaud-Dubé, A., Guay, F., Talbot, D. C., Taylor, G., & Koestner, R. (2015) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9288-0 · Cited by 126
Morry, M. M., & Kito, M. (2009) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.149.3.305-322 · Cited by 105
Fehr, R., Yam, K. C., He, W., Chiang, J. T., & Wei, W. (2017) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.02.002 · Cited by 106
Gawke, J. C. L., Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000105 · Cited by 120
The importance of novelty satisfaction for multiple positive outcomes in physical education
González‐Cutre, D., & Sicilia, Á. (2018) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x18783980 · Cited by 139
The Associations between Ethical Organizational Culture, Burnout, and Engagement: A Multilevel Study
Huhtala, M., Tolvanen, A. J., Mauno, S., & Feldt, T. (2014) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9369-2 · Cited by 105
Pajo, K., Coetzer, A., & Guenole, N. (2010) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2010.00295.x · Cited by 105
A validation of the revised circadian type inventory in a working sample
Di Milia, L., Smith, P. A., & Folkard, S. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.012 · Cited by 104
Gignac, G. E., Palmer, B. R., & Stough, C. (2007) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890701629730 · Cited by 104
Meganck, R., Vanheule, S., & Desmet, M. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191107306140 · Cited by 104
Tian, L., Zhang, L., Huebner, E. S., Zheng, X., & Liu, W. (2015) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-015-9436-5 · Cited by 117
Golino, H. F., Moulder, R. G., Jr., Shi, D., Christensen, A. P., Garrido, L. E., Nieto, M. D., Nesselroade, J. R., Sadana, R., Thiyagarajan, J. A., & Boker, S. M. (2020) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2020.1779642 · Cited by 114
Olino, T. M., Michelini, G., Mennies, R. J., Kotov, R., & Klein, D. N. (2021) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13394 · Cited by 104
Fokkema, M., Smits, N., Kelderman, H., & Cuijpers, P. J. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0031669 · Cited by 104
Bundick, M. J., & Tirri, K. A. (2014) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2014.924357 · Cited by 103
Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys
Davidov, E., & Depner, F. (2009) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9297-9 · Cited by 103
Grandparenthood and Subjective Well-Being: Moderating Effects of Educational Level
Mahne, K., & Huxhold, O. (2014) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbu147 · Cited by 103
Hoofs, H., van de Schoot, R., Jansen, N., & Kant, I. (2017) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164417709314 · Cited by 114
Lanz, M., Sorgente, A., & Danes, S. M. (2019) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/2167696819876752 · Cited by 103
Lichtenfeld, S., Pekrun, R. H., Marsh, H. W., Nett, U. E., & Reiss, K. M. (2022) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000748 · Cited by 114
Self-citationI know what you did: The effects of interpersonal deviance on bystanders.
Ferguson, M. J., & Barry, B. (2011) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021708 · Cited by 103
Krasne, S., Wimmers, P. F., Relan, A., & Drake, T. A. (2006) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-005-5290-9 · Cited by 103
Using the Bollen-Stine Bootstrapping Method for Evaluating Approximate Fit Indices
Kim, H., & Millsap, R. E. (2014) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.947352 · Cited by 102
Stebbings, J., Taylor, I. M., & Spray, C. M. (2011) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.33.2.255 · Cited by 113
Larson, L. R., Cooper, C. B., Stedman, R. C., Decker, D. J., & Gagnon, R. J. (2018) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1447714 · Cited by 102
Kim, Y. E., & Lee, B. (2019) · Psychiatry Investigation · doi:10.30773/pi.2019.0226 · Cited by 102
Schachner, M. K., Schwarzenthal, M., Moffitt, U., Civitillo, S., & Juang, L. P. (2021) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101971 · Cited by 102
Austin, E. W., Austin, B., Willoughby, J. F., Amram, O., & Domgaard, S. (2021) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2021.1899345 · Cited by 102
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R. H., & Lüdtke, O. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-022-09662-9 · Cited by 108
Self-citationCampbell, S. B., & Renshaw, K. D. (2013) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.06.007 · Cited by 102
Kirkman, B. L., Mathieu, J. E., Cordery, J. L., Rosen, B., & Kukenberger, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024198 · Cited by 110
Random intercept EFA of personality scales
Aichholzer, J. (2014) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001 · Cited by 102
The impact of salesperson customer orientation on sales performance via mediating mechanism
Singh, R. K., & Venugopal, P. (2015) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-08-2012-0141 · Cited by 102
Jaakkola, T. T., & Watt, A. P. (2011) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.30.3.248 · Cited by 102
Jowett, G. E., Hill, A. P., Hall, H., & Curran, T. (2012) · Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029770 · Cited by 101
Volunteer decisions (not) to leave: Reasons to quit versus functional motives to stay
Willems, J., Huybrechts, G., Jegers, M., Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., & Pepermans, R. (2012) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726712442554 · Cited by 101
Organizational justice and workplace mediation: a six‐factor model
Nabatchi, T., Bingham, L. B., & Good, D. H. (2007) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/10444060710759354 · Cited by 101
Elliott, W. B., Fanning, K., & Peecher, M. E. (2019) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-52508 · Cited by 107
Furlong, C., & Vignoles, V. L. (2020) · Identity · doi:10.1080/15283488.2020.1856664 · Cited by 118
Thelk, A. D., Sundre, D. L., Horst, S. J., & Finney, S. J. (2009) · The Journal of General Education · doi:10.1353/jge.0.0047 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z.
- Affiliations
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- South China Normal University (CN)
- Venue
- Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-341
- ISSN
- 1070-5511 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2025781576
- Cited by
- 6,691
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 630 · 2025: 545 · 2024: 421 · 2023: 452 · 2022: 485 · 2021: 490 · 2020: 480 · 2019: 413 · 2018: 345 · 2017: 310 · 2016: 292 · 2015: 315 · 2014: 278 · 2013: 253 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 88.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- goodness of fit index, cut-off values, model misspecification, type I error, nested models, hypothesis testing, structural equation modeling, model fit assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review