The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings
Abstract
Goodness-of-fit (GOF) indexes provide "rules of thumb"—recommended cutoff values for assessing fit in structural equation modeling. Hu and Bentler (1999) proposed a more rigorous approach to evaluating decision rules based on GOF indexes and, on this basis, proposed new and more stringent cutoff values for many indexes. This article discusses potential problems underlying the hypothesis-testing rationale of their research, which is more appropriate to testing statistical significance than evaluating GOF. Many of their misspecified models resulted in a fit that should have been deemed acceptable according to even their new, more demanding criteria. Hence, rejection of these acceptable-misspecified models should have constituted a Type 1 error (incorrect rejection of an "acceptable" model), leading to the seemingly paradoxical results whereby the probability of correctly rejecting misspecified models decreased substantially with increasing N. In contrast to the application of cutoff values to evaluate each solution in isolation, all the GOF indexes were more effective at identifying differences in misspecification based on nested models. Whereas Hu and Bentler (1999) offered cautions about the use of GOF indexes, current practice seems to have incorporated their new guidelines without sufficient attention to the limitations noted by Hu and Bentler (1999).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The criterion of the model fit was RMSEA <0.08, CFI >0.90, TLI >0.90 and SRMR <0.08 (Marsh et al., 2004).”
From Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach (2024) · cites this paper as Marsh et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,933
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130 · Cited by 10,418
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,690
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330
Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third Edition
Byrne, B. M. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315757421 · Cited by 4,653
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
- 10.1037//1040-3590.12.4.371 · DOI
- 10.1037//1082-989X.3.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-843X.109.4.624 · DOI
- 10.1037//1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Ed.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- 10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.247 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Chen, F. F. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701301834 · Cited by 12,217
Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008) · Dublin Institute of Technology · doi:10.21427/d7cf7r · Cited by 8,746
Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006288127 · Cited by 4,087
Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x · Cited by 3,735
Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation
Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (2014) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002 · Cited by 3,276
A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006286345 · Cited by 2,718
Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit
Barrett, P. T. (2006) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018 · Cited by 2,640
Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.
McNeish, D. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000144 · Cited by 2,533
On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 · Cited by 2,441
Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems
Grace, J. B. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617799 · Cited by 2,432
Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics
Iacobucci, D. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 · Cited by 2,263
Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0014694 · Cited by 2,242
Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality Traits
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113514105 · Cited by 2,162
The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria: What Did They Really Say?
Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428105284919 · Cited by 2,053
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923
El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada
Lloret-Segura, S., Traver, A. F., Hernández, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361 · Cited by 2,164
Xia, Y. R., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2 · Cited by 1,692
Gefen (2011) · doi:10.2307/23044042 · Cited by 1,596
Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124108314720 · Cited by 1,538
How to factor-analyze your data right: do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s.
Matsunaga, M. (2010) · International journal of psychological research · doi:10.21500/20112084.854 · Cited by 1,431
The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being.
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032141 · Cited by 1,027
Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2 · Cited by 1,386
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510902751010 · Cited by 1,245
Self-citationModel fit and model selection in structural equation modeling.
West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012) · Cited by 1,232
Masten, A. S., Roisman, G. I., Long, J. D., Burt, K. B., Obradović, J., Riley, J. R., Boelcke-Stennes, K., & Tellegen, A. (2005) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.733 · Cited by 1,152
Osman, A., Wong, J. L., Bagge, C. L., Freedenthal, S. L., Gutierrez, P. M., & Lozano, G. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21908 · Cited by 1,097
Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510903008220 · Cited by 1,093
Self-citationAchievement Emotions and Academic Performance: Longitudinal Models of Reciprocal Effects
Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12704 · Cited by 1,091
Self-citationPatrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83 · Cited by 1,085
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211413125 · Cited by 1,064
Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing: Some Practical Reminders
Chin, W. W., Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2008) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679160402 · Cited by 1,044
Current Methodological Considerations in Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Schmitt, T. A. (2011) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282911406653 · Cited by 995
Ferguson, S. L., Moore, E. W. G., & Hull, D. M. (2019) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025419881721 · Cited by 969
Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior
Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.406 · Cited by 961
Trainor, K. J., Andzulis, J. “., Rapp, A. A., & Agnihotri, R. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.002 · Cited by 958
Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale
Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 · Cited by 950
A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0019227 · Cited by 899
Self-citationStructural Equation Modeling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions
Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2004) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239 · Cited by 946
What Does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory Really Measure?
Ackerman, R. A., Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., & Kashy, D. A. (2010) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191110382845 · Cited by 927
Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2015) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.961800 · Cited by 913
Self-citationMeasurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137 · Cited by 845
Psychological Need Thwarting in the Sport Context: Assessing the Darker Side of Athletic Experience
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, C. (2011) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.33.1.75 · Cited by 847
Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001 · Cited by 815
Evaluating Model Fit:a Synthesis of the Structural Equation Modelling Literature
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (2008) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · doi:10.21427/d79b73 · Cited by 748
Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfn035 · Cited by 743
Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.
Byrne, B. M. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 722
Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice
Kahn, J. H. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006286347 · Cited by 694
Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. L. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064 · Cited by 765
Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior
Moser, A. K. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2014-1179 · Cited by 760
Arciniega, G. M., Anderson, T. C., Tovar‐Blank, Z. G., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2008) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.19 · Cited by 681
Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM)
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.895855 · Cited by 679
Testing Structural Equation Models or Detection of Misspecifications?
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510903203433 · Cited by 679
How Should the Internal Structure of Personality Inventories Be Evaluated?
Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310361240 · Cited by 671
Multiple-Group Analysis of Similarity in Latent Profile Solutions
Morin, A. J. S., Meyer, J. P., Creusier, J., & Biétry, F. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115621148 · Cited by 664
Comparison of Model Fit Indices Used in Structural Equation Modeling Under Multivariate Normality
Cangür, Ş., & Ercan, İ. (2015) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1430453580 · Cited by 656
Dam, N. T. V., & Earleywine, M. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.018 · Cited by 647
Profiling teachers' readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who's ready?
Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675 · Cited by 732
Tarka, P. (2017) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8 · Cited by 720
Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001 · Cited by 703
Thinking twice about sum scores
McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01398-0 · Cited by 658
Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Model Misspecification and Model Types
Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701382864 · Cited by 604
Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood.
Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R., González, R., Didier, N., Carrasco, D., Cadena, M. P., et al. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000175 · Cited by 601
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1 · Cited by 599
Self-citationDifferent types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being
Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000209 · Cited by 583
Evaluating Model Fit of Measurement Models in Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Goretzko, D., Siemund, K., & Sterner, P. (2023) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131644231163813 · Cited by 646
The Search for "Optimal" Cutoff Properties: Fit Index Criteria in Structural Equation Modeling
Sivo, S. A., Fan, X., Witta, E. L., & Willse, J. T. (2006) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.3200/jexe.74.3.267-288 · Cited by 570
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0025250 · Cited by 562
van der Gaag, M., Hoffman, T. O., REMIJSEN, M., Hijman, R., DEHAAN, L., VANMEIJEL, B., VANHARTEN, P., Valmaggia, L., DEHERT, M., & CUIJPERS, A. (2006) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.03.021 · Cited by 555
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., & Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, C. (2010) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.32.2.193 · Cited by 603
An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research
Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. W. (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 542
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000281 · Cited by 535
Self-citationAttached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet
Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., & Oliveira, A. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024 · Cited by 534
Sass, D. A. (2011) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282911406661 · Cited by 531
Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of replika
Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600 · Cited by 522
The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree
Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306 · Cited by 514
Beck, J. G., Grant, D. M., Read, J. P., Clapp, J. D., Coffey, S. F., Miller, L. M., & Palyo, S. A. (2007) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.02.007 · Cited by 506
Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing
Lang, F. R., John, D. T., Lüdtke, O., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z · Cited by 545
Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., & Dewan, S. M. (2017) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2016.1267411 · Cited by 499
Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/mhqa-cd89 · Cited by 497
Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027470 · Cited by 541
Self-citationSheldon, K. M., & Hilpert, J. C. (2012) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4 · Cited by 487
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., Ryan, M. K., Jetten, J., Peters, K., & Boen, F. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002 · Cited by 537
On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications
Antonakis, J. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.006 · Cited by 509
Choi, S. W., Schalet, B., Cook, K. F., & Cella, D. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0035768 · Cited by 480
Ababneh, O. M. A. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2020.1814708 · Cited by 477
Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., & Craven, R. G. (2019) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503 · Cited by 522
Self-citationCabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.5243/jsswr.2010.8 · Cited by 466
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K. P., & Rose, E. A. (2008) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.30.3.323 · Cited by 502
Raineri, N., & Paillé, P. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2548-x · Cited by 481
The role of atmospheric cues in online impulse-buying behavior.
Floh, A., & Madlberger, M. (2013) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2013.06.001 · Cited by 460
A Tutorial on Hierarchically Structured Constructs
Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x · Cited by 459
Byrne, B. M., & Stewart, S. M. (2006) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_7 · Cited by 459
“It's Who I Am … Really!’ The Importance of Integrated Regulation in Exercise Contexts1
Wilson, P. M., Rodgers, W. M., Loitz, C. C., & Scime, G. (2006) · Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2006.tb00021.x · Cited by 457
Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2019) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014 · Cited by 454
The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale
Wilson, P. M., Rogers, W. T., Rodgers, W. M., & Wild, T. C. (2006) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.28.3.231 · Cited by 452
Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., & Barabadi, E. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263117000304 · Cited by 451
School-Related Social Support and Students' Perceived Life Satisfaction
Danielsen, A. G., Samdal, O., Hetland, J., & Wold, B. (2009) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.3200/joer.102.4.303-320 · Cited by 523
Neighborhood Disadvantage: Pathways of Effects for Young Children
Kohen, D., Leventhal, T., Dahinten, V. S., & McIntosh, C. N. (2008) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01117.x · Cited by 450
Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Markland, D. A., & Bringer, J. D. (2008) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.30.2.200 · Cited by 466
Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale)
Lukat, J., Margraf, J., Lutz, R., van der Veld, W. M., & Becker, E. S. (2016) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0111-x · Cited by 449
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z.
- Affiliations
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- South China Normal University (CN)
- Venue
- Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-341
- ISSN
- 1070-5511 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2025781576
- Cited by
- 6,691
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 630 · 2025: 545 · 2024: 421 · 2023: 452 · 2022: 485 · 2021: 490 · 2020: 480 · 2019: 413 · 2018: 345 · 2017: 310 · 2016: 292 · 2015: 315 · 2014: 278 · 2013: 253 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 88.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- goodness of fit index, cut-off values, model misspecification, type I error, nested models, hypothesis testing, structural equation modeling, model fit assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review