The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings
Abstract
Goodness-of-fit (GOF) indexes provide "rules of thumb"—recommended cutoff values for assessing fit in structural equation modeling. Hu and Bentler (1999) proposed a more rigorous approach to evaluating decision rules based on GOF indexes and, on this basis, proposed new and more stringent cutoff values for many indexes. This article discusses potential problems underlying the hypothesis-testing rationale of their research, which is more appropriate to testing statistical significance than evaluating GOF. Many of their misspecified models resulted in a fit that should have been deemed acceptable according to even their new, more demanding criteria. Hence, rejection of these acceptable-misspecified models should have constituted a Type 1 error (incorrect rejection of an "acceptable" model), leading to the seemingly paradoxical results whereby the probability of correctly rejecting misspecified models decreased substantially with increasing N. In contrast to the application of cutoff values to evaluate each solution in isolation, all the GOF indexes were more effective at identifying differences in misspecification based on nested models. Whereas Hu and Bentler (1999) offered cautions about the use of GOF indexes, current practice seems to have incorporated their new guidelines without sufficient attention to the limitations noted by Hu and Bentler (1999).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The criterion of the model fit was RMSEA <0.08, CFI >0.90, TLI >0.90 and SRMR <0.08 (Marsh et al., 2004).”
From Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach (2024) · cites this paper as Marsh et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130 · Cited by 10,418
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,690
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330
Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third Edition
Byrne, B. M. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315757421 · Cited by 4,653
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
- 10.1037//1040-3590.12.4.371 · DOI
- 10.1037//1082-989X.3.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-843X.109.4.624 · DOI
- 10.1037//1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Ed.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- 10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.247 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,052 of 1,052
A holistic management tool for measuring internal marketing activities
Huang, Y.-T., & Rundle-Thiele, S. R. (2015) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-03-2015-0112 · Cited by 74
Equivalence of symptom dimensions in females and males with autism
Frazier, T. W., & Hardan, A. Y. (2017) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361316660066 · Cited by 71
Measurement Invariance of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale Across Adult Attachment Style
Cordon, S. L., & Finney, S. J. (2008) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1080/07481756.2008.11909817 · Cited by 71
Skogan, A. H., Egeland, J., Zeiner, P., Øvergaard, K. R., Oerbeck, B., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., & Aase, H. (2016) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2014.992401 · Cited by 66
Bernard, D. L., Jones, S. C. T., & Volpe, V. V. (2020) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/0095798420924529 · Cited by 66
“…the cutoff (Hu & Bentler, 1999), the CFI value (.91) was relatively high, and the RMSEA value (.12) was slightly higher than desired but was within acceptable limits given degrees of freedom (Taasoobshirazi & Wang, 2016), indicating overall acceptable fit in accordance with Marsh et al. (2004).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialScherer, R., & Campos, D. G. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100479 · Cited by 63
Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zu räumlichen Strategien
Münzer, S., & Hölscher, C. (2011) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000040 · Cited by 64
Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale-second edition: a reliable and useful instrument
Osman, A., Gutierrez, P. M., Bagge, C. L., Fang, Q., & Emmerich, A. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20727 · Cited by 62
Markowitz, L. A., Reyes, C., Embacher, R. A., Speer, L. L., Roizen, N., & Frazier, T. W. (2016) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361315611382 · Cited by 58
Wuyts, D., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S. (2018) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.012 · Cited by 58
Varni, J. W., Beaujean, A. A., & Limbers, C. A. (2013) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0370-4 · Cited by 56
González-Robles, A., Mira, A., Miguel, C., Molinari, G., Díaz-García, A., García-Palacios, A., Bretón-López, J. M., Quero, S., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206516 · Cited by 51
Choosing an Endorser for a Women’s Sporting Event: The Interaction of Attractiveness and Expertise
Cunningham, G. B., Fink, J. S., & Kenix, L. J. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9340-z · Cited by 51
Adoption of AI writing tools among academic researchers: A Theory of Reasoned Action approach
Al-Bukhrani, M. A., Alrefaee, Y. M. H., & Tawfik, M. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313837 · Cited by 50
Anxiety among Lebanese adolescents: scale validation and correlates
Merhy, G., Azzi, V., Salameh, P., Obeid, S., & Hallit, S. (2021) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-021-02763-4 · Cited by 48
Sun, P., Fan, X., Sun, Y., Jiang, H., & Wang, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02549 · Cited by 47
Idås, T., Backholm, K., & Korhonen, J. (2019) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2019.1620085 · Cited by 45
Wu, C., Geldhof, G. J., Xue, Q.-L., Kim, D. H., Newman, A. B., & Odden, M. C. (2018) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwy041 · Cited by 45
Construct Validity of the WISC–IVUKWith a Large Referred Irish Sample
Watkins, M. W., Canivez, G. L., James, T., James, K., & Good, R. (2013) · International Journal of School & Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/21683603.2013.794439 · Cited by 43
Narcissistic traits in young people: understanding the role of parenting and maltreatment
van Schie, C. C., Jarman, H. L., Huxley, E., & Grenyer, B. F. S. (2020) · Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation · doi:10.1186/s40479-020-00125-7 · Cited by 42
Psychological Flexibility Among Competitive Athletes: A Psychometric Investigation of a New Scale
Johles, L., Gustafsson, H., Jansson-Fröjmark, M., Classon, C., Hasselqvist, J., & Lundgren, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2020.00110 · Cited by 38
“It is important to note that these fit indices are only guidelines, and should not be interpreted as the golden rules (Marsh et al., 2004).”
BackgroundA new symptom model for autism cross-validated in an independent sample
Boomsma, A., Van Lang, N. D. J., De Jonge, M. V., De Bildt, A. A., Van Engeland, H., & Minderaa, R. B. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01897.x · Cited by 36
Frielink, N., Schuengel, C., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2019) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000366 · Cited by 36
Mira, A., González-Robles, A., Molinari, G., Miguel, C., Díaz-García, A., Bretón-López, J., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., Baños, R., & Botella, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00180 · Cited by 35
Spinhoven, P., Penelo, E., de Rooij, M., Penninx, B. W., & Ormel, J. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713000822 · Cited by 33
Moyano, N., Perez-Yus, M. C., Herrera-Mercadal, P., Navarro-Gil, M., Valle, S., & Montero-Marin, J. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02433-9 · Cited by 38
Tisocco, F., & Liporace, M. F. (2023) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-022-09622-9 · Cited by 34
Nakano, S., & Watkins, M. W. (2013) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.21724 · Cited by 27
Krammer, G., Sommer, M., & Arendasy, M. E. (2017) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1285781 · Cited by 25
Gong, X., Huebner, E. S., & Tian, L. (2021) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-020-00752-2 · Cited by 26
Alnabulsi, H., Drury, J., Vignoles, V. L., & Oogink, S. (2020) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2623 · Cited by 25
Examining the Attitude–Behavior Gap in EU Ecolabel Adoption: A Mediation Path Analysis
Recio-Román, A., Recio-Menéndez, M., & Román-González, M. V. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16167214 · Cited by 23
Gu, H., Wen, Z., & Fan, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00740 · Cited by 22
“As suggested in the literature (Hu and Bentler, 1999; Marsh et al., 2004), adequate and excellent model fit may be indicated by values greater than 0.90 and 0.95, respectively, on CFI and TLI, and by values lower than 0.08 and 0.06, respectively, on RMSEA.”
ResultInfluentialSelf-citationZhang, C.-Q., Chung, P.-K., Si, G., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2016) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.006 · Cited by 21
Confirmatory factor analysis of the WISC-IV in a hospital referral sample.
Devena, S. E., Gay, C. E., & Watkins, M. W. (2013) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282913483981 · Cited by 22
Maujean, A., Gullo, M. J., Andersen, T. E., Ravn, S. L., & Sterling, M. (2017) · PAIN Reports · doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000000631 · Cited by 22
Kim, H., Li, N., Broyles, A., Musoka, L., & Correa-Fernández, V. (2023) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.1892700 · Cited by 21
Puccio, F., Kalathas, F., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., & Krug, I. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.018 · Cited by 20
Wang, W.-T., & Lu, C.-C. (2014) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919392.2014.866501 · Cited by 19
Marengo, D., Settanni, M., Prino, L. E., Parada, R. H., & Longobardi, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00770 · Cited by 19
Revisiting the five-facet structure of mindfulness
Karl, J. A., & Fischer, R. (2020) · Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences · doi:10.1186/s42409-020-00014-3 · Cited by 19
Scafuto, F., Quinto, R. M., Ghiroldi, S., Montecucco, N. F., Presaghi, F., Iani, L., & De Vincenzo, F. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06081-7 · Cited by 16
Gender differences in figural matrices: The moderating role of item design features
Arendasy, M. E., & Sommer, M. (2012) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.08.003 · Cited by 16
Badenes-Ribera, L., Longobardi, C., Gastaldi, F. G. M., & Fabris, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Adolescence and Youth · doi:10.1080/02673843.2021.2011333 · Cited by 15
Fishbein, J. N., Baer, R. A., Correll, J., & Arch, J. J. (2022) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191120980061 · Cited by 14
Fang, S., Huang, M., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051661 · Cited by 12
“06 were considered an excellent fit (Marsh et al., 2004).”
The Experiential Approach Scale: Development and preliminary psychometric properties
Swails, J. A., Zettle, R. D., Burdsal, C. A., & Snyder, J. J. (2016) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0188-x · Cited by 12
Pajón, L., Greco, A. M., Pereda, N., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2020) · Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica · doi:10.5944/rppc.26017 · Cited by 11
Decoupling personality and acute psychiatric symptoms in a depressed sample and a community sample.
Fournier, J. C., Wright, A. G. C., Tackett, J. L., Uliaszek, A. A., Pilkonis, P. A., Manuck, S. B., & Bagby, R. M. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702618813989 · Cited by 10
POLAK, M. G., VAN RIEL, L., INGENHOVEN, T. J. M., & VAN, H. L. (2018) · Journal of Psychiatric Practice · doi:10.1097/pra.0000000000000323 · Cited by 9
Lep, Ž., Trunk, A., & Babnik, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887587 · Cited by 5
Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala WISC-V en Escolares Rurales Chilenos
Rodríguez-Cancino, M., Vizcarra, M. B., & Concha-Salgado, A. (2022) · Psykhe · doi:10.7764/psykhe.2020.22529 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z.
- Affiliations
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- South China Normal University (CN)
- Venue
- Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-341
- ISSN
- 1070-5511 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2025781576
- Cited by
- 6,691
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 630 · 2025: 545 · 2024: 421 · 2023: 452 · 2022: 485 · 2021: 490 · 2020: 480 · 2019: 413 · 2018: 345 · 2017: 310 · 2016: 292 · 2015: 315 · 2014: 278 · 2013: 253 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 88.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- goodness of fit index, cut-off values, model misspecification, type I error, nested models, hypothesis testing, structural equation modeling, model fit assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review