Cited by 276Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Peer-assessed outcomes in the multimodal treatment study of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Hoza, Betsy, Gerdes, Alyson C., Mrug, Sylvie, Hinshaw, Stephen P., Bukowski, William M., Gold, Joel A., Arnold, L. Eugene, Abikoff, Howard B. +13 more·2005·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

Peer-assessed outcomes were examined at the end of treatment (14 months after study entry) for 285 children (226 boys, 59 girls) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who were rated by their classmates (2,232 classmates total) using peer sociometric procedures. All children with ADHD were participants in the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (MTA). Treatment groups were compared using the orthogonal treatment contrasts that accounted for the largest amount of variance in prior MTA outcome analyses: Medication Management + Combined Treatment versus Behavior Therapy + Community Care; Medication Management versus Combined Treatment; Behavior Therapy versus Community Care. There was little evidence of superiority of any of the treatments for the peer-assessed outcomes studied, although the limited evidence that emerged favored treatments involving medication management. Post hoc analyses were used to examine whether any of the four treatment groups yielded normalized peer relationships relative to randomly selected-classmates. Results indicated that children from all groups remained significantly impaired in their peer relationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_7

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manualofmentaldisorders (4th ed.).Washington,DC:Author.
  2. Hoza, B., Mrug, S., Gerdes, A. C., Hinshaw, S. P., Bukowski,W. M., Gold, J. A., et al. (in press). What aspects of peer relationships are impaired in children with ADHD? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
  3. Pelham, W. E., Schnedler, R. W., Bender, M. E., Nilsson, D. E., Miller, J., Budrow, M. S., et al. (1988). The combination of behavior therapy and methylphenidate in the treatment of attention deficit disorders: A therapy outcome study. In L. Bloomingdale (Ed.), Attention deficit disorder (Vol. III, pp. 29-48). New York: Pergamon.
  4. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  5. Weiss, G.,&Hechtman, L. T. (1993). Hyperactive children grown up (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoza, B., Gerdes, A. C., Mrug, S., Hinshaw, S. P., Bukowski, W. M., Gold, J. A., Arnold, L. E., Abikoff, H. B., Conners, C. K., Elliott, G. R., Greenhill, L. L., Hechtman, L., Jensen, P. S., Kraemer, H. C., March, J. S., Newcorn, J. H., Severe, J. B., Swanson, J. M., Vitiello, B., Wells, K. C., & Wigal, T.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Suburban Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2005-02
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
74-86
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2127760169
Cited by
276
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Education
  • University of Pittsburgh (UO1 MH50467)
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh062583-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01 MH50447, U01MH50461, U01MH50440, U01MH050467, U01MH50454, MH-50467, U01MH050447, U01MH050440, U01MH050453, R01 MH62583, U01MH50467, U01MH050461, U01MH50453, U01MH050454)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, peer assessment, peer relationships, sociometric status, medication management, behavior therapy, community-based care, treatment comparison, children
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Child, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Social Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review