Cited by 74Tactile and Sensory InteractionsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanisms

rTMS of the occipital cortex abolishes Braille reading and repetition priming in blind subjects

Kupers, R., Pappens, M., de Noordhout, A. Maertens, Schoenen, J., Ptito, M., Fumal, A.·2007·Neurology

Abstract

To study the functional involvement of the visual cortex in Braille reading, we applied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over midoccipital (MOC) and primary somatosensory (SI) cortex in blind subjects. After rTMS of MOC, but not SI, subjects made significantly more errors and showed an abolishment of the improvement in reading speed following repetitive presentation of the same word list, suggesting a role of the visual cortex in repetition priming in the blind.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000255958.60530.11

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural disruption of visual cortex with TMS interferes with Braille reading.

    “Additionally, neural disruption of visual cortex with TMS interferes with Braille reading (Cohen et al., 1997; Kupers et al., 2007).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Kupers et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kupers, R., Pappens, M., de Noordhout, A. M., Schoenen, J., Ptito, M., & Fumal, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • From the PET Unit and Department of Surgical Pathophysiology (R.K., M.P.), Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Neurology and Neuroanatomy (A.M.d.N., J.S., A.F.), University of Liège, Belgium; and Ecole d’Optométrie (M.P.), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2007-02-27
Volume
68
Issue
9
Pages
691-693
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1968750799
Cited by
74
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
Braille reading, repetition priming, visual cortex, occipital cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, blindness, transcranial magnetic stimulation, reading speed, visual cortex reorganization
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Blindness, Cues, Evoked Potentials, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Occipital Lobe, Reading, Sensory Aids, Task Performance and Analysis, Touch, Visual Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review