Cited by 518Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The occult aftermath of boxing.

Open access
Roberts, G W, Allsop, D, Bruton, C·1990·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

The repeated head trauma experienced by boxers can lead to the development of dementia pugilistica (DP)--punch drunk syndrome. The neuropathology of DP in a classic report by Corsellis et al describes the presence of numerous neurofibrillary tangles in the absence of plaques, in contrast to the profusion of tangles and plaques seen in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The DP cases used in that report were re-investigated with immunocytochemical methods and an antibody raised to the beta-protein present in AD plaques. We found that all DP cases with substantial tangle formation showed evidence of extensive beta-protein immunoreactive deposits (plaques). These diffuse "plaques" were not visible with Congo-red or standard silver stains. The degree of beta-protein deposition was comparable to that seen in AD. Our data indicate that the present neuropathological description of DP (tangles but no plaques) should be altered to acknowledge the presence of substantial beta-protein deposition (plaques). The molecular markers present in the plaques and tangles of DP are the same as those in AD. Similarities in clinical symptoms, distribution of pathology and neurochemical deficits also exist. Epidemiological studies have shown that head injury is a risk factor in AD. It is probable that DP and AD share common pathogenic mechanisms leading to tangle and plaque formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.53.5.373

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the past, based on studies in boxers with extensive neurotrauma exposure, slurred and dysarthric speech, gait problems, Parkinsonism, cognitive impairment, and dementia were considered clinical features.

    “In the past, based on studies in boxers with extensive neurotrauma exposure, slurred and dysarthric speech, gait problems, Parkinsonism, cognitive impairment, and dementia were considered clinical features [2, 48, 49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, G. W., Allsop, D., & Bruton, C.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1990-05-01
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
373-378
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123546024
Cited by
518
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
chronic traumatic encephalopathy, boxing, head trauma, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, neuropathology, immunocytochemistry, common pathogenic mechanisms
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Boxing, Brain, Brain Concussion, Brain Damage, Chronic, Dementia, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Male, Middle Aged, Neurofibrils, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review