Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term follow-up of patients with neuromyelitis optica after repeated therapy with rituximab

Pellkofer, H.L., Krumbholz, M., Berthele, A., Hemmer, B., Gerdes, L.A., Havla, J., Bittner, R., Canis, M., Meinl, E., Hohlfeld, R., Kuempfel, T.·2011·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a severe autoimmune disease targeting optic nerves and spinal cord. The monoclonal anti-CD20 B-cell antibody rituximab is an emerging therapeutic option in NMO. However, neither long-term efficacy or safety of rituximab, nor the correlation between B-cell counts, B-cell fostering cytokines, aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-ab), and disease activity in NMO, have been investigated prospectively. METHODS: We performed a prospective long-term cohort study of 10 patients with NMO who were treated up to 5 times with rituximab as a second-line therapy. Clinical examinations, B-cell counts, and serum concentrations of BAFF (B-cell activating factor of the TNF family; also called TNFSF13b), APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand; also called TNFSF13), AQP4-ab, and immunoglobulin levels were measured every 3 months. RESULTS: Repeated treatment with rituximab led to sustained clinical stabilization in most patients with NMO. Disease activity correlated with B-cell depletion, but not clearly with AQP4-ab or levels of APRIL. BAFF levels increased after application of rituximab and indicated persisting efficacy of the drug but did not correlate with disease activity. Overall, rituximab was well-tolerated even after up to 5 consecutive treatment courses; however, we observed several severe adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that long-term therapy with rituximab is effective in NMO as a second-line therapy and has an acceptable safety profile. Retreatment with rituximab should be applied before reappearance of circulating B cells. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that repeated doses of rituximab result in stabilization in most patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182152881

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Pellkofer, H. L., Krumbholz, M., Berthele, A., Hemmer, B., Gerdes, L. A., Havla, J., Bittner, R., Canis, M., Meinl, E., Hohlfeld, R., & Kuempfel, T.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2011-04-12
Volume
76
Issue
15
Pages
1310-1315
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2021279859
Cited by
296
References
29
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term follow-up of patients with neuromyelitis optica after repeated therapy with rituximab. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182152881
The paper
Pellkofer, H. L., Krumbholz, M., Berthele, A., Hemmer, B., Gerdes, L. A., Havla, J., Bittner, R., Canis, M., Meinl, E., Hohlfeld, R., & Kuempfel, T. (2011). Long-term follow-up of patients with neuromyelitis optica after repeated therapy with rituximab. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182152881

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.