Cited by 441Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD): Part IV. Rates of cognitive change in the longitudinal assessment of probable Alzheimer's disease

Morris, J. C., Edland, S., Clark, C., Galasko, D., Koss, E., Mohs, R., van Belle, G., Fillenbaum, G. +1 more·1993·Neurology

Abstract

Reliable information on rate of progression of cognitive impairment in probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) is important for evaluating possible beneficial effects of therapeutic agents and in planning long-term care for patients with this chronic illness. However, wide variability exists in published rates of change for psychometric measures of the dementing process, and there is need for an accurate analysis of large numbers of persons with the disorder studied over long periods. Utilizing the large, well-characterized sample of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease and employing a least squares regression method to adjust for different levels of impairment and periods of observation, we report rates of change on the Short Blessed Test, Mini-Mental State Examination, Blessed Dementia Scale, Clinical Dementia Rating, and other cognitive measures in 430 patients with probable AD (mean age at entry = 70.9 +/- 8.0 SD years) studied for up to 4 years. We found that rate-of-change determinations are less reliable when the observation period is 1 year or less, that dementia progression may be nonlinear when described by certain measures, and that simple change scores do not accurately characterize the rate of decline. We also found that rate of progression in AD is determined by the severity of cognitive impairment: the less severe the dementia, the slower the rate of decline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.43.12.2457

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, J. C., Edland, S., Clark, C., Galasko, D., Koss, E., Mohs, R., van Belle, G., Fillenbaum, G., & Heyman, A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Washington University School of Medicine (Dr. Morris), St. Louis, MO; the University of Washington (S. Edland and Dr. van Belle), Seattle, WA; the University of Pennsylvania (Dr. Clark), Philadelphia, PA; the University of California at San Diego (Dr. Galasko), La Jolla, CA, Case Western Reserve University (Dr. Koss), Cleveland, OH; Mount Sinai/Bronx Veterans Administration Medical Center (Dr. Mohs), New York, NY; and Duke University Medical Center (Drs. Fillenbaum and Heyman), Durham, NC.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1993-12
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
2457-2457
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2128136330
Cited by
441
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (NIA AG 0670)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia progression, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating, cognitive impairment severity, longitudinal cognitive assessment
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Mental Status Schedule, Neuropsychological Tests, Registries, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review