Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 817

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The question of familial meningiomas and schwannomas: NF2B or not to be?

King, Allison, Gutmann, David H.·2000·Neurology
DOI 10.1212/wnl.54.1.4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The last comparison of prevalence figures of dementia across European studies was 10 years ago. Using studies conducted in the 1990s, the authors compare the age- and sex-specific prevalence of dementia, AD, and vascular dementia (VaD) across European population-based studies of persons 65 years and older. Data from these studies were also pooled to obtain stable estimates of age- and sex-specific prevalence. A total of 2346 cases of mild to severe dementia were identified in 11 cohorts. Age-standardized prevalence was 6.4% for dementia (all causes), 4.4% for AD, and 1.6% for VaD. The prevalence of dementia increased continuously with age and was 0.8% in the group age 65 to 69 years and 28.5% at age 90 years and older. The corresponding figures for AD (53.7% of cases) were 0.6% and 22.2%, and for VaD (15.8% of cases), 0.3% and 5.2%. Variation of AD prevalence across studies was greatest for men. In the VaD subtype, a large variation across studies was observed, as well as a difference in prevalence between men and women that was age dependent. Dementia is more prevalent in women, and AD is the main contributor to the steep increase of prevalence with age.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.54.1.4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1136/jnnp.62.4.361 · DOI
  2. 10.1212/WNL.54.1.71 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550010065042 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/BF02100156 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/00006123-199908000-00049 · DOI
  6. 10.1212/WNL.43.10.2096 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0165-4608(97)00394-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1212/WNL.46.4.1072 · DOI
  9. 10.1159/000245948 · DOI
  10. 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0036 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/301633 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S1071-9091(98)80003-X · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
King, A., & Gutmann, D. H.
Venue
Neurology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2000-01-11
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
4-4
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
DOI
10.1212/wnl.54.1.4
OpenAlex
W2122925474
Cited by
817
References
0
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.