Cited by 168Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The influence of right frontotemporal dysfunction on social behavior in frontotemporal dementia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is associated with a variety of cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions. Symptoms may be influenced by the relative involvement of the right versus the left hemisphere, with left-sided FTD manifesting language changes and right-sided FTD presenting with aggressive, antisocial, and other socially undesirable behaviors. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that right-sided FTD is associated with socially undesirable behavior. METHODS: The authors assessed 41 patients with FTD diagnosed by the new research criteria for FTD(1) including behavioral, neuropsychologic, and neurologic testing as well as SPECT and MRI. Based on visual inspection of SPECT scans, 12 patients were classified as having predominantly right-sided and 19 patients were classified as having predominantly left-sided FTD. A clinician blinded to the imaging data reviewed medical records to tabulate the frequency of the following socially undesirable behaviors: criminal behavior, aggression, loss of job, alienation from family/friends, financial recklessness, sexually deviant behavior, and abnormal response to spousal crisis. RESULTS: Eleven of 12 right-sided and 2 of 19 left-sided FTD patients had socially undesirable behavior as an early presenting symptom (chi = 23.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that right-sided frontotemporal degeneration is associated with socially undesirable behavior. The early presence of socially undesirable behavior in FTD differentiates right-sided from left-sided degeneration. The results highlight the importance of the right hemisphere, especially frontotemporal regions, in the mediation of social behavior. The potential mechanism for these social losses with right-sided disease is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_4.s11

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mychack, P., Kramer, J. H., Boone, K. B., & Miller, B. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2001-06-12
Volume
56
Issue
suppl_4
Pages
S11-5
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1979781351
Cited by
168
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
frontotemporal dementia, right hemisphere dominance, aggression, antisocial behavior, hemispheric lateralization, social behavior, SPECT imaging
MeSH terms
Aggression, Crime, Dementia, Humans, Functional Laterality, Social Alienation, Social Behavior Disorders, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review