The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics
Abstract
The Will to Improve is a remarkable account of development in action. Focusing on attempts to improve landscapes and livelihoods in Indonesia, Tania Murray Li carefully exposes the practices that enable experts to diagnose problems and devise interventions, and the agency of people whose conduct is targeted for reform. Deftly integrating theory, ethnography, and history, she illuminates the work of colonial officials and missionaries; specialists in agriculture, hygiene, and credit; and political activists with their own schemes for guiding villagers toward better ways of life. She examines donor-funded initiatives that seek to integrate conservation with development through the participation of communities, and a one-billion-dollar program designed by the World Bank to optimize the social capital of villagers, inculcate new habits of competition and choice, and remake society from the bottom up. Demonstrating that the “will to improve” has a long and troubled history, Li identifies enduring continuities from the colonial period to the present. She explores the tools experts have used to set the conditions for reform—tools that combine the reshaping of desires with applications of force. Attending in detail to the highlands of Sulawesi, she shows how a series of interventions entangled with one another and tracks their results, ranging from wealth to famine, from compliance to political mobilization, and from new solidarities to oppositional identities and violent attack. The Will to Improve is an engaging read—conceptually innovative, empirically rich, and alive with the actions and reflections of the targets of improvement, people with their own critical analyses of the problems that beset them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · Cited by 1,928
New frontiers of land control: Introduction
Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011) · Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607692 · Cited by 1,181
The Power to Plunder: Rethinking Land Grabbing in Latin America
Mollett, S. (2016) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.12190 · Cited by 99
de Leeuw, S. (2009) · Children's Geographies · doi:10.1080/14733280902798837 · Cited by 95
Large-scale land deals from the inside out: findings from Kenya's Tana Delta
Smalley, R., & Corbera, E. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.686491 · Cited by 81
Ouma, M., & Adésínà, J. (2019) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018318817482 · Cited by 64
‘Rigid demand’: Economic imagination and practice in China's urban housing market
Wang, M. (2018) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098017747511 · Cited by 50
Dealing with the digital panopticon: the use and subversion of ICT in an Indian bureaucracy
Veeraraghavan, R. (2013) · Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers - Volume 1 · doi:10.1145/2516604.2516631 · Cited by 44
Psy-expertise, therapeutic culture and the politics of the personal in development
Klein, E., & Mills, C. (2017) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1319277 · Cited by 43
Asher, K. (2020) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.12470 · Cited by 29
Development as Entangled Knot: The Case of the Slaughter Renunciation Movement in Tibet, China
(Kabzung), G. (2015) · The Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s0021911815001175 · Cited by 25
Introduction: A return to politics
Postero, N., & Elinoff, E. (2019) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499618814933 · Cited by 25
Ofstehage, A. (2016) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.998651 · Cited by 20
Investigating global mental health: contributions from political science
Patterson, A. S., Boadu, N. Y., Clark, M., Janes, C., Monteiro, N., Roberts, J. H., Shiffman, J., Thomas, D., & Wipfli, H. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1724315 · Cited by 15
Planned Relocation as a Contentious Strategy of Climate Change Adaptation in Fiji
Benge, L., & Neef, A. (2020) · Climate-Induced Disasters in the Asia-Pacific Region: Response, Recovery, Adaptation · doi:10.1108/s2040-726220200000022008 · Cited by 5
Torre, C. (2023) · Civil Wars · doi:10.1080/13698249.2023.2209485 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T. M.
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2007
- OpenAlex
- W4237051774
- Cited by
- 1,779
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.