Cited by 164Plant Molecular Biology ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationPlant Parasitism and Resistance

LATERAL ORGAN FUSION1 and LATERAL ORGAN FUSION2 function in lateral organ separation and axillary meristem formation in Arabidopsis

Lee, Dong-Keun, Geisler, Matt, Springer, Patricia S.·2009·Development

Abstract

Plant organs are generated from meristems throughout development. Patterning and elaboration of organ primordia occur as a result of organized cell division and expansion, processes that are likely to be controlled, in part, by meristem-derived signals. Communication between the meristem and lateral organs is crucial for meristem maintenance and organ patterning, and organ boundaries are thought to be important for mediating this communication. Arabidopsis thaliana LATERAL ORGAN FUSION1 (LOF1) encodes a MYB-domain transcription factor that is expressed in organ boundaries. lof1 mutants display defects in organ separation as a result of abnormal cell division and expansion during early boundary formation. lof1 mutants also fail to form accessory shoot meristems. Mutations in the closely related LATERAL ORGAN FUSION2 (LOF2) gene enhance the lof1 phenotype, such that lof1 lof2 double mutants display additional fusion defects. Genetic interactions with the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON genes CUC2 and CUC3 revealed a role for LOF1 in both organ separation and axillary meristem formation. Expression of the meristem determinant STM was reduced in lof1 mutant paraclade junctions and lof1 enhanced the weak stm-10 mutant, such that double mutants had severe defects in meristem maintenance and organ separation. Our data implicate LOF1 and LOF2 in boundary specification, meristem initiation and maintenance, and organ patterning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.031971

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, D.-K., Geisler, M., & Springer, P. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Venue
Development
Published
2009-07-15
Volume
136
Issue
14
Pages
2423-2432
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2123698468
Cited by
164
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Keywords
organ boundaries, MYB transcription factors, CUC2, organ patterning, Arabidopsis thaliana
MeSH terms
Cell Division, Mutation, Phenotype, Transcription Factors, Genes, Plant, Arabidopsis, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Meristem, Arabidopsis Proteins, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review