The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FGF-, BMP- and Shh-mediated signalling pathways in the regulation of cranial suture morphogenesis and calvarial bone development
Abstract
The development of calvarial bones is tightly co-ordinated with the growth of the brain and needs harmonious interactions between different tissues within the calvarial sutures. Premature fusion of cranial sutures, known as craniosynostosis, presumably involves disturbance of these interactions. Mutations in the homeobox gene Msx2 as well as the FGF receptors cause human craniosynostosis syndromes. Our histological analysis of mouse calvarial development demonstrated morphological differences in the sagittal suture between embryonic and postnatal stages. In vitro culture of mouse calvaria showed that embryonic, but not postnatal, dura mater regulated suture patency. We next analysed by in situ hybridisation the expression of several genes, which are known to act in conserved signalling pathways, in the sagittal suture during embryonic (E15-E18) and postnatal stages (P1-P6). Msx1 and Msx2 were expressed in the sutural mesenchyme and the dura mater. FGFR2(BEK), as well as Bmp2 and Bmp4, were intensely expressed in the osteogenic fronts and Bmp4 also in the mesenchyme of the sagittal suture and in the dura mater. Fgf9 was expressed throughout the calvarial mesenchyme, the dura mater, the developing bones and the overlying skin, but Fgf4 was not detected in these tissues. Interestingly, Shh and Ptc started to be expressed in patched pattern along the osteogenic fronts at the end of embryonic development and, at this time, the expression of Bmp4 and sequentially those of Msx2 and Bmp2 were reduced, and they also acquired patched expression patterns. The expression of Msx2 in the dura mater disappeared after birth. FGF and BMP signalling pathways were further examined in vitro, in E15 mouse calvarial explants. Interestingly, beads soaked in FGF4 accelerated sutural closure when placed on the osteogenic fronts, but had no such effect when placed on the mid-sutural mesenchyme. BMP4 beads caused an increase in tissue volume both when placed on the osteogenic fronts and on the mid-sutural area, but did not effect suture closure. BMP4 induced the expression of both Msx1 and Msx2 genes in sutural tissue, while FGF4 induced only Msx1. We suggest that the local application of FGF on the osteogenic fronts accelerating suture closure in vitro, mimics the pathogenesis of human craniosynostosis syndromes in which mutations in the FGF receptor genes apparently cause constitutive activation of the receptors. Taken together, our data suggest that conserved signalling pathways regulate tissue interactions during suture morphogenesis and intramembranous bone formation of the calvaria and that morphogenesis of mouse sagittal suture is controlled by different molecular mechanisms during the embryonic and postnatal stages. Signals from the dura mater may regulate the maintenance of sutural patency prenatally, whereas signals in the osteogenic fronts dominate after birth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptor Specificity of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Family
Ornitz, D. M., Xu, J., Colvin, J. S., McEwen, D. G., MacArthur, C. A., Coulier, F., Gao, G., & Goldfarb, M. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.25.15292 · Cited by 1,871
Bitgood, M. J., & McMahon, A. P. (1995) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.1995.0010 · Cited by 1,370
A common mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome
Muenke, M., Schell, U., Hehr, A., Robin, N. H., Losken, H. W., Schinzel, A., Pulleyn, L. J., Rutland, P., Reardon, W., Malcolm, S., et al. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1194-269 · Cited by 614
Cited by
Canonical Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Prevents Osteoblasts from Differentiating into Chondrocytes
Hill, T. P., Später, D., Taketo, M. M., Birchmeier, W., & Hartmann, C. (2005) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.013 · Cited by 1,084
Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault.
Jiang, X., Iseki, S., Maxson, R. E., Sucov, H. M., & Morriss-Kay, G. M. (2002) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0487 · Cited by 782
1 Developmental roles and clinical significance of Hedgehog signaling
McMahon, A. P., Ingham, P. W., & Tabin, C. J. (2003) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(03)53002-2 · Cited by 772
Id Genes Are Direct Targets of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Induction in Embryonic Stem Cells
Hollnagel, A., Oehlmann, V., Heymer, J., Rüther, U., & Nordheim, A. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.28.19838 · Cited by 527
Disruption of the fibroblast growth factor-2 gene results in decreased bone mass and bone formation
Montero, A., Okada, Y., Tomita, M., Ito, M., Tsurukami, H., Nakamura, T., Doetschman, T., Coffin, J. D., & Hurley, M. M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci8641 · Cited by 483
Marroig, G., & Cheverud, J. M. (2001) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00770.x · Cited by 425
Disruption of Fgf10/Fgfr2b-coordinated epithelial-mesenchymal interactions causes cleft palate
Rice, R., Spencer‐Dene, B., Connor, E. C., Gritli-Linde, A., McMahon, A. P., Dickson, C., Thesleff, I., & Rice, D. P. C. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci200420384 · Cited by 364
Self-citationIseki, S., Wilkie, A. O. M., & Morriss-Kay, G. M. (1999) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.126.24.5611 · Cited by 305
Mansukhani, A., Bellosta, P., Sahni, M., & Basilico, C. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.149.6.1297 · Cited by 295
Msx homeobox gene family and craniofacial development
ALAPPAT, S., ZHANG, Z. Y., & CHEN, Y. P. (2003) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7290185 · Cited by 278
Jenkins, D., Seelow, D., Jehee, F. S., Perlyn, C. A., Alonso, L. G., Bueno, D. F., Donnai, D., Josifiova, D., Mathijssen, I. M. J., Morton, J. E. V., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/518047 · Cited by 276
Wang, H., Yoshiko, Y., Yamamoto, R., Minamizaki, T., Kozai, K., Tanne, K., Aubin, J. E., & Maeda, N. (2008) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.080220 · Cited by 263
Depew, M. J., Tucker, A. S., & Sharpe, P. T. (2002) · Mouse Development · doi:10.1016/b978-012597951-1/50023-8 · Cited by 259
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in development and skeletal diseases
Teven, C. M., Farina, E. M., Rivas, J., & Reid, R. R. (2014) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2014.09.005 · Cited by 237
Ibrahimi, O. A. (2003) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddh011 · Cited by 128
MT1-MMP Inactivates ADAM9 to Regulate FGFR2 Signaling and Calvarial Osteogenesis
Chan, K. M., Wong, H. L. X., Jin, G., Liu, B., Cao, R., Cao, Y., Lehti, K., Tryggvason, K., & Zhou, Z. (2012) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.04.014 · Cited by 83
Hwang, S.-H., White, K. A., Somatilaka, B. N., Shelton, J. M., Richardson, J. A., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.154054 · Cited by 60
Sun, J., Ishii, M., Ting, M.-C., & Maxson, R. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.085225 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H.-J., Rice, D. P. C., Kettunen, P. J., & Thesleff, I.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1241-1251
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2155343233
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.