Cited by 306Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Promoting Healthy Choices: Information versus Convenience

Wisdom, Jessica, Downs, Julie S, Loewenstein, George·2010·American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

Abstract

Success in slowing obesity trends would benefit from policies aimed at reducing calorie consumption. In a field experiment at a fast-food sandwich chain, we address the effects of providing calorie information, mimicking recent legislation, and test an alternative approach that makes ordering healthier slightly more convenient. We find that calorie information reduces calorie intake. Providing a daily calorie target does as well, but only for non-overweight individuals. Making healthy choices convenient reduces intake when the intervention is strong. However, a milder implementation reduces sandwich calories, but does not reduce total calories due to compensatory effects on side orders and drinks. (JEL I12, I18, L81)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/app.2.2.164

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a sandwich shop study, selection of healthy sandwiches increased by 44% when healthy options were presented on page one of the menu and unhealthy sandwiches on another page.

    “In one study in a sandwich shop, selection of healthy sandwiches was increased by 44% when the healthy options were presented on page one of the menu and the unhealthy sandwiches were on another page.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wisdom, J., Downs, J. S., & Loewenstein, G.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
164-178
ISSN
  • 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7790
OpenAlex
W2072795148
Cited by
304
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Journal Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
calorie labeling, fast food, obesity prevention, energy intake, compensation effect, food choice, nutrition policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review