The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Differences and MIS Success: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Abstract
Of the numerous factors believed to influence MIS success, the area of individual differences has by far been the most extensively studied. This paper synthesizes the findings of empirical investigations of the manner in which individual differences impact MIS success. Suggestions are made regarding those aspects which would benefit most from future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Response time in man-computer conversational transactions
Miller, R. B. (1968) · Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I on - AFIPS '68 (Fall, part I) · doi:10.1145/1476589.1476628 · Cited by 942
Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement
Swanson, E. B. (1974) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.21.2.178 · Cited by 529
Cited by
Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250921 · Cited by 8,767
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
Wamba-Taguimdje, S.-L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-10-2019-0411 · Cited by 1,280
The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance1
Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148745 · Cited by 1,169
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W.-M., & Tam, K.-Y. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045692 · Cited by 827
An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use
Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011 · Cited by 722
Determinants of success for computer usage in small business
DeLone, W. H. (1988) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248803 · Cited by 703
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624
The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing
Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K. (1992) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1992.11517949 · Cited by 498
Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits
Srivastava, S. C., Chandra, S., & Shirish, A. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12067 · Cited by 456
A Meta-Analysis of Research on Information Technology Implementation in Small Business
Premkumar, G. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1207/s15327744joce1302_2 · Cited by 444
THONG, J. Y. L., HONG, W., & TAM, K.-Y. (2002) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(02)91024-4 · Cited by 347
Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology
Barnett, T., Pearson, A. W., Pearson, R., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.10 · Cited by 281
Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: toward developing a unified view
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.019 · Cited by 274
Process Tracing Methods in Decision Support Systems Research: Exploring the Black Box
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1987) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248979 · Cited by 224
A Technology Readiness-Based Taxonomy of Customers: A Replication and Extension
Tsikriktsis, N. (2004) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670504266132 · Cited by 210
The Impact of Automated Office Systems on Middle Managers and Their Work
Millman, Z., & Hartwick, J. (1987) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248977 · Cited by 147
Person-Job Cognitive Style Fit for Software Developers: The Effect on Strain and Performance
CHILTON, M. A., HARDGRAVE, B. C., & ARMSTRONG, D. J. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045849 · Cited by 138
Computer-mediated knowledge sharing and individual user differences: an exploratory study
Taylor, W. A. (2004) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000484 · Cited by 134
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92
Productivity enhancement from computer-mediated communication: a systems contingency approach
Hiltz, S. R. (1988) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/53580.53583 · Cited by 91
Demographic determinants of electronic commerce (EC) adoption by SMEs: A twist by location factors
Awa, H. O., Baridam, D. M., & Nwibere, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-10-2013-0073 · Cited by 70
Mobile Banking Adoption: Examining the Role of Personality Traits
Agyei, J., Sun, S., Abrokwah, E., Penney, E. K., & Ofori-Boafo, R. (2020) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020932918 · Cited by 69
Awa, H. O., Eze, S. C., Urieto, J. E., & Inyang, B. J. (2011) · Journal of Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1108/13287261111135981 · Cited by 61
Okorie Awa, H., Ukoha, O., & Emecheta, B. (2012) · InSITE Conference · doi:10.28945/1676 · Cited by 46
Examining decision characteristics & challenges for agile software development
Drury-Grogan, M. L., Conboy, K., & Acton, T. (2017) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.003 · Cited by 45
Zimmer, J. C., Tams, S., Craig, K., Thatcher, J., & Pak, R. (2015) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-015-0762-8 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Zmud, R. W.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1979-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 966-979
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2002398380
- Cited by
- 836
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
