Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor

Kirsch, Laurie J., Ko, Dong-Gil, Haney, Mark H.·2010·Organization Science

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly relying on team-based structures as work becomes more complex, nonroutine, and knowledge intensive. Teams comprised of individuals with diverse skills and expertise may be well suited to perform such work. However, as teams become more prevalent, organizations may struggle with ways to exercise control. Formal controls, with their focus on prespecified rules, performance targets, and hierarchical relationships, may be less effective in a teamwork environment than clan control, in which work-related behavior is motivated by shared norms and values, as well as a common vision, and individuals attempt to be accepted or “regular” members of a team. However, little is known about the antecedents of clan control. Much of the existing empirical research on the antecedents of control has been influenced by Ouchi's (Ouchi, W. G. 1977. The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22 95–113) framework, which posits clan control is used when managers lack knowledge of means–ends relationships and are unable to measure outcomes. This paper adopts the view that clan control is a “people” or social process and argues that social capital, a construct that reflects connections and relationships among individuals, is a missing, key antecedent of clan control. In particular, we posit that the existence of social capital enables team members, as well as project managers, to facilitate clan control within a team, i.e., team-based clan control. A model is developed and hypotheses are tested using survey data collected from 95 information systems project teams. The results suggest that social capital assets are associated with team-based clan control. Recognizing that the project manager typically has a different level of organizational authority than team members, additional hypotheses are developed relating characteristics of the project manager to team-based clan control. The results of these tests suggest that team-based clan control is also dependent on the manager's knowledge of business processes and the application area, coupled with the extent to which he observes the behaviors of the project team. Thus, our results suggest that there are conditions under which team-based clan control is facilitated by the project team as a whole (including team members and project managers), as well as conditions under which team-based clan control is facilitated by project managers in their role as team leaders. Implications and suggestions for future work are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1090.0458

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.2307/3152068 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045666 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2307/1252187 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/3069401 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bliese P. D., 2000, Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, 349
  6. 10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0084 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/3069393 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1287/isre.14.3.291.16563 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/1059601197221004 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.2307/1556384 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1109/TEM.2006.872245 · DOI
  15. 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0526 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00774.x · DOI
  17. 10.2307/256325 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.2307/258578 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1287/mnsc.38.6.757 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jaccard J., 1990, Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
  21. 10.2307/1251447 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.2307/1252057 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/25148670 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.339 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1287/orsc.7.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1287/isre.8.3.215 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1287/isre.1040.0036 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1287/mnsc.48.4.484.204 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.2307/1251779 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/203330.203345 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1287/orsc.1060.0191 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1986.tb00953.x · DOI
  33. Mähring M. IT project governance. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm
  34. 10.2307/25148704 · DOI
  35. McFarlan W. F., 1981, Harvard Bus. Rev., 59, 142
  36. 10.2307/25148759 · DOI
  37. Mohrman S. A., 1995, Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work
  38. 10.2307/249562 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
  40. 10.1177/0021886300361002 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.2307/2391748 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.2307/2392231 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.2307/420517 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1287/isre.1080.0177 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1109/MS.2002.1003450 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1287/isre.1080.0169 · DOI
  48. Schmidt E., 2005, Newsweek
  49. 10.1287/isre.1060.0098 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/256375 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.2307/25148732 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1109/TSE.2002.1019481 · DOI
  53. 10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.1069 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.2307/257085 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.5465/amr.2006.19379631 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.2307/25148667 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.2307/3556678 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Kirsch, L. J., Ko, D.-G., & Haney, M. H.
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2010-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
469-489
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2165682523
Cited by
254
References
9
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1090.0458
The paper
Kirsch, L. J., Ko, D.-G., & Haney, M. H. (2010). Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0458

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.