The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea
Abstract
In this paper we investigate the relationship between supplier trust in the buyer and transaction costs and information sharing in a sample of 344 supplier-automaker exchange relationships in the United States, Japan, and Korea. Our findings indicate that perceived trustworthiness reduces transaction costs and is correlated with greater information sharing in supplier-buyer relationships. Moreover, the findings suggest that the value created for transactors, in terms of lower transaction costs, may be substantial. In particular, we found that the least-trusted automaker spent significantly more of its face-to-face interaction time with suppliers on contracting and haggling when compared to the most trusted automaker. This translated into procurement (transaction) costs that were five times higher for the least trusted automaker. Finally, we argue that trust is unique as a governance mechanism because it not only minimizes transaction costs, but also has a mutually causal relationship with information sharing, which also creates value in the exchange relationship. Other governance mechanisms (e.g., contracts, financial hostages) are necessary costs incurred to prevent opportunistic behavior, but do not create value beyond transaction cost minimization. Our findings provide empirical evidence that trustworthiness lowers transaction costs and may be an important source of competitive advantage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256824 · Cited by 2,467
Deutsch, M. (1958) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200275800200401 · Cited by 2,077
Explaining the Swollen Middle: Why Most Transactions Are a Mix of “Market” and “Hierarchy”
Hennart, J.-F. (1993) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.4.4.529 · Cited by 652 · cited 3×
“Share = a + (b1) TRUST + (b2) ASSET.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Abegglen J. C., 1985, Kaisha: The Japanese Corporation
- 10.2307/1252172 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511571701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0889-1583(89)90029-4 · DOI
- 10.2307/3172900 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250150912 · DOI · Paper page
- Butler P. T., 1997, McKinsey Quart., 3
- Casson Mark, 1990, Enterprise and Competitiveness: A Systems View of International Business
- Clark Kim B., 1991, Product Development Performance
- 10.2307/590932 · DOI · Paper page
- Doz Y. L., 1998, Alliance Advantage
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199604)17:4<271::AID-SMJ807>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.7.6.649 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<535::AID-SMJ885>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- Fukuyama Francis, 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity
- 10.2307/256729 · DOI
- 10.2307/1251683 · DOI
- Helper Susan, 1991, Sloan Management Rev., 15
- 10.1287/orsc.6.1.119 · DOI
- 10.1086/466922 · DOI
- Kotler P., 1985, The New Competition
- 10.2307/2393534 · DOI · Paper page
- Lorenz Edward H., 1988, Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 194
- Nishiguchi Toshihiro, 1994, Strategic Industrial Sourcing, 10.1093/oso/9780195071092.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Ouchi William G., 1984, The M-Form Society
- Pine B. J., 1993, Mass Customization
- Powell Walter W., 1990, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295
- 10.1002/smj.4250130702 · DOI
- Sako Mari, 1991, Ricerche Economiche, 449
- 10.1002/smj.4250150805 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2393808 · DOI · Paper page
- Williamson Oliver E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
- 10.1002/smj.4250160504 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.9.2.141 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00298.x · DOI · Paper page
- Zucker Lynne G., 1986, Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53
Cited by
The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆
Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001 · Cited by 1,018
At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust: Trust Across Multiple Organizational Levels
Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312439327 · Cited by 886
Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations
McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011) · Journal of Trust Research · doi:10.1080/21515581.2011.552424 · Cited by 477
Modeling corporate citizenship, organizational trust, and work engagement based on attachment theory
Lin, C.-P. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0279-6 · Cited by 237
Delbufalo, E. (2012) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598541211246549 · Cited by 214
The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case
Aoki, K., & Wilhelm, M. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1156 · Cited by 130
The global value chain and internalization theory
Benito, G. R. G., Petersen, B., & Welch, L. S. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00218-8 · Cited by 131
Trust across borders: buyer-supplier trust in global business-to-business E-commerce.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Koh, T., Fichman, M., Carnegie Mellon University, Kraut, R., & Carnegie Mellon University (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00316 · Cited by 73
Tribal Governance: The Business of Blockchain Authentication
Miscione, G., Ziolkowski, R., Zavolokina, L., & Schwabe, G. (2018) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.566 · Cited by 38
“Trust does not only minimize transaction costs, but also creates value (with enhanced information sharing) for such relationship [24].”
BackgroundTrust, Decision Rights Delegation, and Performance—The Case of Franchising
Herz, M., Hutzinger, C., Seferagic, H., & Windsperger, J. (2016) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12227 · Cited by 35
The governance paradox: Preferences of small vulnerable firms in the homebuilding industry
Dewald, J. R., Hall, J., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00173.x · Cited by 17
Influence of Media Capabilities on Trust in the Sharing Economy
Harrison, A., Mirsadikov, A., & Luu, T. (. (2023) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2023.2229118 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-68
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2014435970
- Cited by
- 1,542
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 52.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.