Cited by 216Organizational Change and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Management and Change

Affective Commitment to Change and Innovation Implementation Behavior: The Role of Charismatic Leadership and Employees’ Trust in Top Management

Michaelis, Björn, Stegmaier, Ralf, Sonntag, Karlheinz·2009·Journal of Change Management

Abstract

This questionnaire-based study investigated the relationship between two aspects of leadership (charismatic leadership and trust in top management) and followers’ innovation implementation behavior. Findings from 194 employees working in R&D teams of a multinational automotive company indicated that charismatic leadership and trust in top management were both positively related to innovation implementation behavior, controlling for followers’ individual differences, management level, and department affiliation. The findings demonstrate that both relationships were mediated by followers’ affective commitment to change. Results implicate the need to more closely bond the concepts of affective commitment to change and innovation implementation behavior and consider their connection in future investigations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14697010903360608

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transformational leadership may predict employees' reported use of an innovative practice being implemented in their organization.

    “For example, transformational leadership (i.e., the degree to which a leader can inspire and motivate others; (Bass & Avolio, 1995) may predict employees’ reported use of an innovative practice being implemented in their organization (Michaelis, Stegmaier, & Sonntag, 2009; Michaelis et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Michaelis, Björn
Venue
Journal of Change Management
Published
2009-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
399-417
ISSN
  • 1469-7017 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1811
OpenAlex
W2048292055
Cited by
216
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Change Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
Keywords
affective commitment to change, charismatic leadership, R&D teams, automotive industry, mediation, organizational change, employee behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review