Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 668

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linking employees' justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: The mediating role of perceived organizational support

Loi, Raymond, Hang‐Yue, Ngo, Foley, Sharon·2006·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
DOI 10.1348/096317905x39657
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Building on the social exchange perspective and organizational support theory, this study examined the relationships among employees' justice perceptions, perceived organizational support (POS), organizational commitment and intention to leave. A hypothesized model was developed and tested using hierarchical regression analyses on a sample of 514 practising solicitors in Hong Kong. The results showed that both procedural and distributive justice contributed to the development of POS, and POS mediated their effects on organizational commitment and intention to leave. As expected, organizational commitment was negatively related to intention to leave. Additional analyses revealed that these relationships held for both partners and non‐partners in law firms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/096317905x39657

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1177/014920630302900107 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.295 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/job.211 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Blau P. M., 1964, Exchange and power in social life
  6. 10.1177/0049124189017003004 · DOI
  7. Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 445
  8. Byrne B. M., 1998, Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming
  9. 10.2307/3090113 · DOI
  10. 10.1006/obhd.2001.2958 · DOI
  11. Cropanzano R., 2001, Advances in organizational justice, 119
  12. 10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20001-2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1177/001872679204500306 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51 · DOI
  17. Fasolo P. M., 1995, Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing social climate at work, 185
  18. 10.1002/1099-1379(200008)21:5<547::AID-JOB41>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  19. Fowler F. J., 1993, Survey research methods
  20. 10.1177/014920639001600208 · DOI
  21. Griffeth R. W., 1995, The employee turnover process, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 245
  22. 10.1177/014920630002600305 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00063-2 · DOI
  24. Hendrix W. H., 1998, Effects of procedural and distributive justice on factors predictive of turnover, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 611
  25. 10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90001-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.698 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1177/014920630002600405 · DOI
  29. Leventhal G. S., 1980, Justice and social interaction, 167
  30. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<305::AID-JOB843>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  31. 10.2307/1556364 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.2307/256489 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/1464-0597.00076 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2307/256913 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1177/001872679905200702 · DOI
  39. Nelson R. L., 1988, Partners with power: The social transformation of the large law firms, 10.1525/9780520317970 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/09585190210149484 · DOI
  41. 10.1108/eb022861 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/h0034829 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Price L. L., 1986, Handbook of organizational measurement
  44. 10.2307/2787041 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199903)20:2<159::AID-JOB881>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  46. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1991.tb00563.x · DOI
  48. 10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Shore L. M., 1995, Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing social climate at work, 149
  50. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.774 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00025-4 · DOI
  52. 10.1006/obhd.1993.1022 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199701)18:1<83::AID-JOB779>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  54. Thibaut J., 1975, Procedural justice: A psychological analysis
  55. 10.1007/BF02291170 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Wallace J. E., 1995, Corporatist control and organizational commitment among professionals: The case of lawyers working in law firms, Social Forces, 73, 811, 10.2307/2580548 · DOI
  57. 10.2307/2393637 · DOI
  58. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.590 · DOI
  59. 10.2307/257021 · DOI
  60. 10.2307/2392665 · DOI

Cited by

See all 668

Metadata

Authors
Loi, R., Hang‐Yue, N., & Foley, S.
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
101-120
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
DOI
10.1348/096317905x39657
OpenAlex
W1983242682
Cited by
668
References
11
FWCI
31.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1759 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.