CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hong–Ou–Mandel interference of two independent continuous-wave coherent photons

Kim, Heonoh, Kim, Danbi, Park, Jiho, Moon, Han Seb·2020·Photonics Research
DOI 10.1364/prj.393246
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Interference between two completely independent photons lies at the heart of many photonic quantum information applications such as quantum repeaters, teleportation, and quantum key distribution. Here, we report the observation of Hong–Ou–Mandel (HOM) interference with two independent continuous-wave coherent light sources that are neither synchronized nor share any common reference. To prepare indistinguishable photons from two independent laser sources, we employ high-precision frequency-stabilization techniques using the 5 S 1 / 2 ( F = 3 ) − 5 P 1 / 2 ( F ′ = 3 ) transition line of Rb 85 atoms. We successfully observe an HOM interference fringe with two independent continuous-wave coherent photons originating from either the frequency-locked or the frequency-modulated lasers. An interference fringe involving two-photon beating is also observed when the frequency difference between the two interfering photons is beyond the spectral bandwidth of the individual coherent photons. We carry out further experiments to verify the robustness of the source preparation regardless of the separation distance between the two independent photon sources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/prj.393246

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A noncommon-path HOM interferometer can measure time shifts with resolutions on the order of a few femtoseconds.

    “In the works mentioned above, a noncommon-path HOM interferometer is employed to measure time shifts with resolutions on the order of a few femto-seconds (micrometers), where the time shifts are obtained by assessing the shift of the HOM dip.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Carnal, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 2689, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2689 · DOI
  2. Tonomura, 1989, Am. J. Phys., 57, 117, 10.1119/1.16104 · DOI
  3. Zeilinger, 1988, Rev. Mod. Phys., 60, 1067, 10.1103/RevModPhys.60.1067 · DOI
  4. Arndt, 1999, Nature, 401, 680, 10.1038/44348 · DOI
  5. Grangier, 1986, Europhys. Lett., 1, 173, 10.1209/0295-5075/1/4/004 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dirac, 1958, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 9
  7. Magyar, 1963, Nature, 198, 255, 10.1038/198255a0 · DOI
  8. Lipsett, 1963, Nature, 199, 553, 10.1038/199553a0 · DOI
  9. Fano, 1961, Am. J. Phys., 29, 539, 10.1119/1.1937827 · DOI
  10. Mandel, 1964, Phys. Rev., 134, A10, 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A10 · DOI
  11. Jordan, 1964, Phys. Rev. Lett., 12, 607, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.607 · DOI
  12. Javan, 1962, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 52, 96, 10.1364/JOSA.52.000096 · DOI
  13. Neugebauer, 1962, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 52, 470, 10.1364/JOSA.52.000470 · DOI
  14. Mandel, 1962, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 52, 1407, 10.1364/JOSA.52.001407 · DOI
  15. Pfleegor, 1967, Phys. Rev., 159, 1084, 10.1103/PhysRev.159.1084 · DOI
  16. Pfleegor, 1967, Phys. Lett. A, 24, 766, 10.1016/0375-9601(67)90259-9 · DOI
  17. Pfleegor, 1968, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 58, 946, 10.1364/JOSA.58.000946 · DOI
  18. Glauber, 1995, Am. J. Phys., 63, 12, 10.1119/1.17790 · DOI
  19. Brown, 1956, Nature, 178, 1046, 10.1038/1781046a0 · DOI
  20. Mandel, 1999, Rev. Mod. Phys., 71, S274, 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S274 · DOI
  21. Yuan, 2010, Phys. Rep., 497, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.004 · DOI
  22. de Riedmatten, 2003, Phys. Rev. A, 67, 022301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.022301 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kaltenbaek, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 240502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.240502 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Qian, 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 013602, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.013602 · DOI
  25. Jung, 2017, Optica, 4, 1167, 10.1364/OPTICA.4.001167 · DOI
  26. Bouwmeester, 1997, Nature, 390, 575, 10.1038/37539 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Pan, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 3891, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3891 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ou, 1989, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 6, 100, 10.1364/JOSAB.6.000100 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Miyamoto, 1993, Opt. Lett., 18, 900, 10.1364/OL.18.000900 · DOI
  30. Liu, 2014, Europhys. Lett., 105, 64007, 10.1209/0295-5075/105/64007 · DOI
  31. Liu, 2015, Opt. Express, 23, 11868, 10.1364/OE.23.011868 · DOI
  32. Liu, 2015, Opt. Commun., 350, 196, 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.04.018 · DOI
  33. Liu, 2016, Chin. Phys. B, 25, 034203, 10.1088/1674-1056/25/3/034203 · DOI
  34. Lo, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 130503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 · DOI
  35. Yuan, 2014, Phys. Rev. Appl., 2, 064006, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.064006 · DOI
  36. Agnesi, 2019, Opt. Lett., 44, 271, 10.1364/OL.44.000271 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Semenenko, 2019, Opt. Lett., 44, 275, 10.1364/OL.44.000275 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Ferreira da Silva, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 88, 052303, 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052303 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Moschandreou, 2018, J. Lightwave Technol., 36, 3752, 10.1109/JLT.50 · DOI
  40. Ferreira da Silva, 2013, J. Lightwave Technol., 31, 2881, 10.1109/JLT.2013.2274615 · DOI
  41. da Silva, 2015, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 32, 545, 10.1364/JOSAB.32.000545 · DOI
  42. Amaral, 2016, Opt. Lett., 41, 1502, 10.1364/OL.41.001502 · DOI
  43. Legero, 2003, Appl. Phys. B, 77, 797, 10.1007/s00340-003-1337-x · DOI
  44. Legero, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 070503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.070503 · DOI
  45. Kim, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 3611, 10.1364/OE.22.003611 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, H., Kim, D., Park, J., & Moon, H. S.
ORCID
Park, Jiho
Venue
Photonics Research
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2020-08-21
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
1491
ISSN
2327-9125
DOI
10.1364/prj.393246
Cited by
20
References
6
Language
en
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2018R1A2A1A19019181)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review