The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proof-of-principle demonstration of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using polarization qubits
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A noncommon-path HOM interferometer can measure time shifts with resolutions on the order of a few femtoseconds.
“In the works mentioned above, a noncommon-path HOM interferometer is employed to measure time shifts with resolutions on the order of a few femto-seconds (micrometers), where the time shifts are obtained by assessing the shift of the HOM dip.”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
The Results and Discussions section reports scanning the relative pulse delay and recording a HOM dip, which supports the time-shift measurement aspect. It gives a dip width of 2.40 ns, but does not describe a noncommon-path HOM interferometer or report resolution of a few femtoseconds. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/341 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1738173 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2007.75 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075003 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045010 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.283.5410.2050 · DOI
- D. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325
- 10.1080/09500340410001730986 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022313 · DOI
- B. Qi, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 073
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042333 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1367-2630/11/6/065003 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.19.023590 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms1348 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.170404 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3597221 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.032320 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.20.018911 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/OE.16.001867 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045015 · DOI
- 10.1002/mop.26256 · DOI
- T. Ferreira da Silva, 2012, Research in Optical Sciences
- 10.1109/JLT.2013.2274615 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012326 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052305 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.012320 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2432296 · DOI
- 10.1088/1464-4266/7/7/007 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052304 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber
Yin, H.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Liu, H., You, L.-X., Zhou, Y.-H., Chen, S.-J., Mao, Y., Huang, M.-Q., Zhang, W.-J., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190501 · Cited by 836
High-rate measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Ottaviani, C., Spedalieri, G., Weedbrook, C., Braunstein, S. L., Lloyd, S., Gehring, T., Jacobsen, C. S., & Andersen, U. L. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.83 · Cited by 476
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferreira da Silva, T., Vitoreti, D., Xavier, G. B., do Amaral, G. C., Temporão, G. P., & von der Weid, J. P.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-11-07
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review