Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proof-of-principle demonstration of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using polarization qubits

Ferreira da Silva, T., Vitoreti, D., Xavier, G. B., do Amaral, G. C., Temporão, G. P., von der Weid, J. P.·2013·Physical Review A

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.88.052303

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A noncommon-path HOM interferometer can measure time shifts with resolutions on the order of a few femtoseconds.

    “In the works mentioned above, a noncommon-path HOM interferometer is employed to measure time shifts with resolutions on the order of a few femto-seconds (micrometers), where the time shifts are obtained by assessing the shift of the HOM dip.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Results and Discussions section reports scanning the relative pulse delay and recording a HOM dip, which supports the time-shift measurement aspect. It gives a dip width of 2.40 ns, but does not describe a noncommon-path HOM interferometer or report resolution of a few femtoseconds. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/341 · DOI
  2. 10.1063/1.1738173 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.75 · DOI
  4. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075003 · DOI
  5. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045010 · DOI
  6. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.283.5410.2050 · DOI
  8. D. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325
  9. 10.1080/09500340410001730986 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022313 · DOI
  11. B. Qi, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 073
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042333 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/6/065003 · DOI
  14. 10.1364/OE.19.023590 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/ncomms1348 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.170404 · DOI
  18. 10.1063/1.3597221 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.032320 · DOI
  20. 10.1364/OE.20.018911 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130502 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130501 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130502 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1364/OE.16.001867 · DOI
  27. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045015 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/mop.26256 · DOI
  29. T. Ferreira da Silva, 2012, Research in Optical Sciences
  30. 10.1109/JLT.2013.2274615 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012326 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052305 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.012320 · DOI
  37. 10.1063/1.2432296 · DOI
  38. 10.1088/1464-4266/7/7/007 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052304 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferreira da Silva, T., Vitoreti, D., Xavier, G. B., do Amaral, G. C., Temporão, G. P., & von der Weid, J. P.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2013-11-07
Volume
88
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
Cited by
227
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review